Study of Acid Reflux in Asthma
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Collaborators:
American Lung Association Asthma Clinical Research Centers
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Robert Wise, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00069823
First received: October 1, 2003
Last updated: December 17, 2012
Last verified: December 2012
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Results First Received: May 14, 2010
| Study Type: | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized; Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor); Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Conditions: |
Asthma Lung Diseases Lung Diseases, Obstructive |
| Interventions: |
Drug: Esomeprazole Drug: Placebo proton pump inhibitor |
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details
| Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
|---|
| The planned enrollment was for 400 participants, 403 participants actually were enrolled and randomized in the trial. It is not uncommon for clinical trials not to exactly meet the sample size stated in the protocol. |
Pre-Assignment Details
| Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Placebo | 40 mg of placebo twice daily |
| Esomeprazole | 40 mg of esomeprazole twice daily |
Participant Flow: Overall Study
| Placebo | Esomeprazole | |
|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 199 [1] | 203 [1] |
| COMPLETED | 193 | 200 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 6 | 3 |
| Did not have follow-up diary cards | 6 | 3 |
| [1] | The design was for 200 participants per group, the study did not exactly meet the design. |
|---|
Baseline Characteristics
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Placebo | 40 mg of placebo twice daily |
| Esomeprazole | 40 mg of esomeprazole twice daily |
| Total | Total of all reporting groups |
Baseline Measures
| Placebo | Esomeprazole | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants
[units: participants] |
199 | 203 | 402 |
|
Age
[units: years] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
42 ± 13 | 42 ± 13 | 42 ± 13 |
|
Gender
[units: participants] |
|||
| Female | 143 | 130 | 273 |
| Male | 56 | 73 | 129 |
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
[1] [units: participants] |
|||
| White | 103 | 102 | 205 |
| Black | 73 | 79 | 152 |
| Hispanic | 17 | 18 | 35 |
| Other | 6 | 4 | 10 |
|
Asthma medication use
[units: participants] |
|||
| Inhaled corticosteroids | 50 | 44 | 94 |
| Combination of fluticasone and salmeterol | 149 | 159 | 308 |
|
Body-mass index >=30
[2] [units: participants] |
|||
| BMI >=30 | 107 | 102 | 209 |
| BMI <30 | 92 | 101 | 193 |
|
Conditions other than asthma
[3] [units: participants] |
|||
| Gastroesophageal reflux disease | 38 | 21 | 59 |
| No GER reported | 161 | 182 | 343 |
|
Former smoker
[units: participants] |
|||
| Former Smoker | 40 | 31 | 71 |
| Never smoked | 159 | 172 | 331 |
|
Health Care Visits
[4] [units: participants] |
|||
| Health care visit for asthma exacerbation | 126 | 109 | 235 |
| No visit | 73 | 94 | 167 |
|
Pulmonary function
[units: participants] |
|||
| Participants with 20% post-diluent measurement | 92 | 83 | 175 |
| 20% from post-diluent contraindicated | 102 | 117 | 219 |
| Missing | 5 | 3 | 8 |
|
potential Hydrogen (pH) monitoring
[5] [units: participants] |
|||
| Positive result | 62 | 61 | 123 |
| Negative result | 89 | 92 | 181 |
| Missing result | 48 | 50 | 98 |
|
%Predicted amount of air expired in the first second during a forced expiration pre broncho-dilator
[6] [units: Percent] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
78 ± 15 | 76 ± 16 | 77 ± 16 |
|
Age of onset of asthma
[units: years] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
17 ± 17 | 17 ± 16 | 17 ± 16 |
|
Age of participants
[units: years] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
|||
| at randomization | 42 ± 13 | 42 ± 13 | 42 ± 13 |
| at onset of asthma | 17 ± 17 | 17 ± 16 | 17 ± 16 |
|
Asthma scores
[7] [units: score] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
|||
| ACQ | 1.9 ± 0.8 | 1.8 ± 0.8 | 1.8 ± 0.8 |
| ASUI | 0.74 ± 0.18 | 0.76 ± 0.15 | 0.75 ± 0.15 |
| mini asthma quality of life questionnaire | 4.7 ± 1.2 | 4.7 ± 1.2 | 4.7 ± 1.2 |
|
Percent change in FEV1 after bronchodilator
[8] [units: Percent change] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
10 ± 10 | 11 ± 16 | 11 ± 13 |
| [1] | Race or ethnic group was self-reported. |
|---|---|
| [2] | The body-mass index is the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters. |
| [3] | These conditions were self-reported. |
| [4] | Unscheduled health care visit for asthma in previous year |
| [5] | Results of ambulatory measure of esophageal potential Hydrogen (pH) for 16 to 24 hours. Test were considered positive if pH was less than 4 for more than 5.8% of the total tiem, 8.2% of upright time, or 3.5% of supine time. |
| [6] | Percent of the predicted value for the amount of air expired in the first second during a forced expiratory maneuver (FEV1) based on gender, age and ethnicity that the measured value is. |
| [7] | Asthma Control Score (ACS)ranges from 0 to 6, lower scores indicating better asthma control and 0.5 as the minimal clinically important difference; Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) score ranges from 0 to 1, higher scores indicating less severe asthma; Mini-Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (mini-AQLQ) score range from 1 to 7, higher scores indicating better quality of life and 0.5 as the minimal clinically important difference. |
| [8] | The percent difference in FEV1 before and after using a bronchodilator (albuterol) divided by the value before bronchodilation. |
Outcome Measures
| 1. Primary: | Episodes of Poor Asthma Control (EPAC) From Diary Cards, According to Definition That Did Not Include Use of Beta-agonists as a Criterion [ Time Frame: Baseline to 24 Weeks ] |
| 2. Secondary: | Exacerbation Components: >=30% Drop in Peak Expiratory Flow on 2 Consecutive Days [ Time Frame: Baseline to 24 Weeks ] |
| 3. Secondary: | Exacerbation Components: Urgent Care Visit [ Time Frame: Measured at Month 6 ] |
| 4. Secondary: | Exacerbation Components: New Use of Oral Corticosteroids [ Time Frame: Baseline to 24 Weeks ] |
| 5. Secondary: | Asthma Episodes, According to Definition That Included Increased Use of Beta-agonists [ Time Frame: Baseline to 24 Weeks ] |
| 6. Secondary: | Use of Rescue Medications [ Time Frame: Baseline to 24 Weeks ] |
| 7. Secondary: | Night Awakening [ Time Frame: Baseline to 24 Weeks ] |
| 8. Secondary: | Pulmonary Function: Change in Prebronchodilator FEV1 [ Time Frame: Baseline to 24 Weeks ] |
| 9. Secondary: | Pulmonary Function: Change in Prebronchodilator Forced Vital Capacity [ Time Frame: Baseline to 24 Weeks ] |
| 10. Secondary: | Pulmonary Function: Change in Peak Flow Rate [ Time Frame: Baseline to 24 Weeks ] |
| 11. Secondary: | Pulmonary Function: Change in PC20 [ Time Frame: Baseline to 24 Weeks ] |
| 12. Secondary: | Change in Juniper Asthma Control Score(JACQ) [ Time Frame: Baseline to 24 Weeks ] |
| 13. Secondary: | Change in Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) [ Time Frame: Baseline to 24 Weeks ] |
| 14. Secondary: | Change in the Mini-Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (Mini-AQLQ) [ Time Frame: Baseline to 24 Weeks ] |
Hide Outcome Measure 14| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change in the Mini-Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (Mini-AQLQ) |
| Measure Description | Mean change. Scores on the Mini-Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (mini-AQLQ)range from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating better quality of life and 0.5 as the minimal clinically important difference. |
| Time Frame | Baseline to 24 Weeks |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Placebo | 40 mg of placebo twice daily |
| Esomeprazole | 40 mg of esomeprazole twice daily |
Measured Values
| Placebo | Esomeprazole | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
191 | 201 |
|
Change in the Mini-Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (Mini-AQLQ)
[units: score] Mean ( 95% Confidence Interval ) |
0.3
( 0.2 to 0.4 ) |
0.3
( 0.2 to 0.4 ) |
Statistical Analysis 1 for Change in the Mini-Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (Mini-AQLQ)
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | Regression, Linear |
| P Value [3] | 0.33 |
| Mean Difference (Net) [4] | -0.1 |
| Standard Error of the mean | ± 0.1 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -0.2 to 0.1 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| No text entered. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| Treatment effect is the difference in mean change in the esomeprazole group minus the mean change in the placebo group |
| 15. Secondary: | Change in Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 Score Quality of Life Score: Physical Component [ Time Frame: Baseline to 24 Weeks ] |
| 16. Secondary: | Change in Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 Quality of Life Score: Mental Component [ Time Frame: Baseline to 24 Weeks ] |
| 17. Secondary: | Change in Gastric Symptoms: Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptom Assessment Scale Score [ Time Frame: Baseline to 24 Weeks ] |
| 18. Secondary: | Change in Number of Gastric Symptoms: No. of Symptoms [ Time Frame: Baseline to 24 Weeks ] |
More Information
Certain Agreements:
Limitations and Caveats
Results Point of Contact:
No publications provided by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Publications automatically indexed to this study:
| Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. |
| There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. |
Limitations and Caveats
| Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Results Point of Contact:
Name/Title: Ellen Brown
Organization: Johns Hopkins University
phone: 443-287-3170
e-mail: ala-acrc@jhsph.edu
Organization: Johns Hopkins University
phone: 443-287-3170
e-mail: ala-acrc@jhsph.edu
No publications provided by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Publications automatically indexed to this study:
| Responsible Party: | Robert Wise, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00069823 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 157, U01 HL72968 |
| Study First Received: | October 1, 2003 |
| Results First Received: | May 14, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | December 17, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Federal Government |