Full Text View
Tabular View
Study Results
Related Studies
Comparison of Teriparatide With Alendronate for Treating Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis
This study has been completed.
Study NCT00051558   Information provided by Eli Lilly and Company
First Received: January 13, 2003   Last Updated: February 13, 2009   History of Changes
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Randomized, Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Active Control, Parallel Assignment
Condition: Osteoporosis
Interventions: Drug: Teriparatide
Drug: Alendronate Sodium
Drug: Placebo

  Participant Flow
  Hide Participant Flow

Recruitment Details
Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations
No text entered.

Pre-Assignment Details
Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment
No text entered.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Teriparatide Teriparatide 20 micrograms/day injection plus oral placebo, 36 months
Alendronate Alendronate 10 mg/day oral plus injection placebo, 36 months

Participant Flow:   Overall Study
  Teriparatide Alendronate
STARTED   214     214  
COMPLETED   123     118  
NOT COMPLETED   91     96  
      Adverse Event               30                 18  
      Withdrawal by Subject               29                 42  
      Death               9                 15  
      Lost to Follow-up               4                 13  
      Protocol Violation               3                 4  
      Protocol Entry Criteria Unmet               1                 2  
      Sponsor Decision               6                 1  
      Unspecified               2                 1  
      Significant Lab Value               2                 0  
      Physician Decision               5                 0  



  Baseline Characteristics
  Hide Baseline Characteristics

Reporting Groups
  Description
Teriparatide Teriparatide 20 micrograms/day injection plus oral placebo, 36 months
Alendronate Alendronate 10 mg/day oral plus injection placebo, 36 months

Baseline Measures
  Teriparatide Alendronate Total
Number of Participants  
[units: participants]
214 214 428
Age, Customized  
[units: participants]
     
Age < 35 years 13 19 32
35 <= Age < 50 years 55 35 90
50 <= Age < 65 years 86 93 179
Age >= 65 years 60 67 127
Gender  
[units: participants]
     
Female 172 173 345
Male 42 41 83
Region of Enrollment  
[units: participants]
     
United States 62 64 126
Belgium 8 8 16
Denmark 4 3 7
Austria 1 2 3
Norway 1 1 2
Argentina 23 20 43
Brazil 72 73 145
Colombia 10 9 19
Venezuela 4 3 7
Mexico 14 15 29
Finland 1 2 3
Germany 14 14 28
Origin  
[units: participants]
     
Caucasian 153 148 301
Non-Caucasian 61 66 127
Prior Bisphosphonate User  
[units: participants]
     
Yes 20 20 40
No 194 194 388
Baseline Biochemical Markers of Bone Metabolism  
[units: ug/L]
Mean ± Standard Deviation
     
Serum N-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen 46.161 ± 35.471 47.235 ± 29.606 46.704 ± 32.562
Procollagen I carboxy-terminal propeptide 166.402 ± 99.625 152.109 ± 56.637 158.845 ± 79.910
Bone-specific alkaline phosphatase 9.465 ± 4.522 9.711 ± 4.527 9.595 ± 4.513
Osteocalcin 17.130 ± 14.422 15.878 ± 10.286 16.492 ± 12.468
Baseline Bone Mineral Density  
[units: grams per square centimeters]
Mean ± Standard Deviation
     
Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density 0.845 ± 0.131 0.844 ± 0.128 0.845 ± 0.129
Total Hip Bone Mineral Density 0.744 ± 0.113 0.757 ± 0.124 0.750 ± 0.119
Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density 0.682 ± 0.114 0.697 ± 0.119 0.689 ± 0.116
C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen  
[units: pmol/L]
Mean ± Standard Deviation
3790.483 ± 2478.189 4543.156 ± 4838.919 4185.328 ± 3907.204



  Outcome Measures
  Show All Outcome Measures

1.  Primary:   Change From Baseline at 18 Month Endpoint in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD)   [ 18 month endpoint ]

2.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline at 18 Month Endpoint in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Female Subset   [ 18 month endpoint ]

3.  Secondary:   Time Course of Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Women and Men Combined   [ 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36 months ]
  Hide Outcome Measure 3

Measure Type Secondary
Measure Title Time Course of Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Women and Men Combined
Measure Description change from baseline in bone mineral density of the lumbar spine as assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)
Time Frame 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36 months  
Safety Issue No  

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
The intention-to-treat analysis was performed using all randomized and treated patients. No missing data were imputed.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Teriparatide Teriparatide 20 micrograms/day injection plus oral placebo, 36 months
Alendronate Alendronate 10 mg/day oral plus injection placebo, 36 months

Measured Values
  Teriparatide Alendronate
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants]
198 195
Time Course of Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Women and Men Combined
[units: grams per square centimeters]
Least Squares Mean ± Standard Error
   
Change from baseline at Month 36 (N=123,N=112) 0.090 ± 0.006 0.044 ± 0.007
Change from baseline at Month 24 (N=136,N=131) 0.081 ± 0.006 0.043 ± 0.006
Change from baseline at Month 18 (N=156,N=148) 0.066 ± 0.005 0.031 ± 0.005
Change from baseline at Month 12 (N=170,N=159) 0.054 ± 0.004 0.028 ± 0.004
Change from baseline at Month 6 (N=178,N=173) 0.034 ± 0.004 0.018 ± 0.004
Change from baseline at Month 3 (N=183,N=184) 0.019 ± 0.004 0.012 ± 0.004


Statistical Analysis 1 for Time Course of Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Women and Men Combined
Groups [1] All groups
Method [2] Mixed Models Analysis
P Value [3] 0.058
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  Mixed Model Repeated Measures: Change in BMD=treatment+region+prior bisphosphonate use+gender+baseline BMD+visit+treatment*visit.
[2] Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom:
  Least Squares Means obtained from the treatment*visit interaction term from the above mixed model repeated measures model.
[3] Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance:
  P-value for Month 3

Statistical Analysis 2 for Time Course of Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Women and Men Combined
Groups [1] All groups
Method [2] Mixed Models Analysis
P Value [3] <0.001
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  Mixed Model Repeated Measures: Change in BMD=treatment+region+prior bisphosphonate use+gender+baseline BMD+visit+treatment*visit.
[2] Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom:
  Least Squares Means obtained from the treatment*visit interaction term from the above mixed model repeated measures model.
[3] Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance:
  P-value for 6 months

Statistical Analysis 3 for Time Course of Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Women and Men Combined
Groups [1] All groups
Method [2] Mixed Models Analysis
P Value [3] <0.001
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  Mixed Model Repeated Measures: Change in BMD=treatment+region+prior bisphosphonate use+gender+baseline BMD+visit+treatment*visit.
[2] Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom:
  Least Squares Means obtained from the treatment*visit interaction term from the above mixed model repeated measures model.
[3] Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance:
  P-value for 12 months

Statistical Analysis 4 for Time Course of Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Women and Men Combined
Groups [1] All groups
Method [2] Mixed Models Analysis
P Value [3] <0.001
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  Mixed Model Repeated Measures: Change in BMD=treatment+region+prior bisphosphonate use+gender+baseline BMD+visit+treatment*visit.
[2] Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom:
  Least Squares Means obtained from the treatment*visit interaction term from the above mixed model repeated measures model.
[3] Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance:
  P-value for 18 months

Statistical Analysis 5 for Time Course of Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Women and Men Combined
Groups [1] All groups
Method [2] Mixed Models Analysis
P Value [3] <0.001
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  Mixed Model Repeated Measures: Change in BMD=treatment+region+prior bisphosphonate use+gender+baseline BMD+visit+treatment*visit.
[2] Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom:
  Least Squares Means obtained from the treatment*visit interaction term from the above mixed model repeated measures model.
[3] Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance:
  P-value for 24 months

Statistical Analysis 6 for Time Course of Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Women and Men Combined
Groups [1] All groups
Method [2] Mixed Models Analysis
P Value [3] <0.001
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  Mixed Model Repeated Measures: Change in BMD=treatment+region+prior bisphosphonate use+gender+baseline BMD+visit+treatment*visit.
[2] Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom:
  Least Squares Means obtained from the treatment*visit interaction term from the above mixed model repeated measures model.
[3] Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance:
  P-value for 36 months



4.  Secondary:   Time Course of Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Female Subset   [ 3, 6, 12, and 18 months ]

5.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Women and Men Combined   [ 24 and 36 months and Endpoint at 36 months ]

6.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Women and Men Combined   [ 18, 24, 36 months, and 18 and 36 month endpoints ]

7.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Women and Men Combined   [ 18, 24, 36 months, and 18 and 36 month endpoints ]

8.  Secondary:   Time Course of Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Women and Men Combined   [ 12, 18, 24, and 36 months ]

9.  Secondary:   Time Course of Change From Baseline in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Women and Men Combined   [ 12, 18, 24, and 36 months ]

10.  Secondary:   Time Course of Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers in Subset of Patients - Serum N-terminal Propeptide of Type 1 Procollagen   [ 1, 6, 18, and 36 months ]

11.  Secondary:   Time Course of Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers in Subset of Patients - Serum C-terminal Propeptide of Type 1 Procollagen   [ 1, 6, 18, and 36 months ]

12.  Secondary:   Time Course of Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers in Subset of Patients - Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase   [ 1, 6, 18, and 36 months ]

13.  Secondary:   Time Course of Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers in Subset of Patients - Serum Type 1 Collagen Degradation Fragments   [ 1, 6, 18, and 36 months ]

14.  Secondary:   Time Course of Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers in Subset of Patients - Osteocalcin   [ 1, 6, 18, and 36 months ]

15.  Secondary:   Any Fracture, Nonvertebral Fractures, Vertebral Fractures, Clinical Vertebral Fractures, and Severity Fractures   [ 36 months ]


  Serious Adverse Events
  Show Serious Adverse Events


  Other Adverse Events
  Show Other Adverse Events


  More Information
  Hide More Information

Certain Agreements:  
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
The agreement is:
unchecked The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is less than or equal to 60 days. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.
unchecked Other disclosure agreement that restricts the right of the PI to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.


Limitations and Caveats
Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data
No text entered.  


Results Point of Contact:  
Name/Title: Chief Medical Officer
Organization: Eli Lilly and Company
phone: 1-800-545-5979


No publications provided by Eli Lilly and Company

Publications automatically indexed to this study:

Responsible Party: Eli Lilly ( Chief Medical Officer )
Study ID Numbers: 6484, B3D-US-GHBZ
Study First Received: January 13, 2003
Results First Received: January 14, 2009
Last Updated: February 13, 2009
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00051558     History of Changes
Health Authority: United States: Food and Drug Administration