|
Home
Search
Study Topics
Glossary
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Study Type: | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study Design: | Randomized, Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Active Control, Parallel Assignment |
| Condition: |
Osteoporosis |
| Interventions: |
Drug: Teriparatide Drug: Alendronate Sodium Drug: Placebo |
Participant Flow
| Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
|---|
| No text entered. |
| Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
|---|
| No text entered. |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Teriparatide | Teriparatide 20 micrograms/day injection plus oral placebo, 36 months |
| Alendronate | Alendronate 10 mg/day oral plus injection placebo, 36 months |
| Teriparatide | Alendronate | |
|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 214 | 214 |
| COMPLETED | 123 | 118 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 91 | 96 |
| Adverse Event | 30 | 18 |
| Withdrawal by Subject | 29 | 42 |
| Death | 9 | 15 |
| Lost to Follow-up | 4 | 13 |
| Protocol Violation | 3 | 4 |
| Protocol Entry Criteria Unmet | 1 | 2 |
| Sponsor Decision | 6 | 1 |
| Unspecified | 2 | 1 |
| Significant Lab Value | 2 | 0 |
| Physician Decision | 5 | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Teriparatide | Teriparatide 20 micrograms/day injection plus oral placebo, 36 months |
| Alendronate | Alendronate 10 mg/day oral plus injection placebo, 36 months |
| Teriparatide | Alendronate | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants [units: participants] |
214 | 214 | 428 |
|
Age, Customized [units: participants] |
|||
| Age < 35 years | 13 | 19 | 32 |
| 35 <= Age < 50 years | 55 | 35 | 90 |
| 50 <= Age < 65 years | 86 | 93 | 179 |
| Age >= 65 years | 60 | 67 | 127 |
|
Gender [units: participants] |
|||
| Female | 172 | 173 | 345 |
| Male | 42 | 41 | 83 |
|
Region of Enrollment [units: participants] |
|||
| United States | 62 | 64 | 126 |
| Belgium | 8 | 8 | 16 |
| Denmark | 4 | 3 | 7 |
| Austria | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Norway | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Argentina | 23 | 20 | 43 |
| Brazil | 72 | 73 | 145 |
| Colombia | 10 | 9 | 19 |
| Venezuela | 4 | 3 | 7 |
| Mexico | 14 | 15 | 29 |
| Finland | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Germany | 14 | 14 | 28 |
|
Origin [units: participants] |
|||
| Caucasian | 153 | 148 | 301 |
| Non-Caucasian | 61 | 66 | 127 |
|
Prior Bisphosphonate User [units: participants] |
|||
| Yes | 20 | 20 | 40 |
| No | 194 | 194 | 388 |
|
Baseline Biochemical Markers of Bone Metabolism [units: ug/L] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
|||
| Serum N-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen | 46.161 ± 35.471 | 47.235 ± 29.606 | 46.704 ± 32.562 |
| Procollagen I carboxy-terminal propeptide | 166.402 ± 99.625 | 152.109 ± 56.637 | 158.845 ± 79.910 |
| Bone-specific alkaline phosphatase | 9.465 ± 4.522 | 9.711 ± 4.527 | 9.595 ± 4.513 |
| Osteocalcin | 17.130 ± 14.422 | 15.878 ± 10.286 | 16.492 ± 12.468 |
|
Baseline Bone Mineral Density [units: grams per square centimeters] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
|||
| Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density | 0.845 ± 0.131 | 0.844 ± 0.128 | 0.845 ± 0.129 |
| Total Hip Bone Mineral Density | 0.744 ± 0.113 | 0.757 ± 0.124 | 0.750 ± 0.119 |
| Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density | 0.682 ± 0.114 | 0.697 ± 0.119 | 0.689 ± 0.116 |
|
C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen [units: pmol/L] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
3790.483 ± 2478.189 | 4543.156 ± 4838.919 | 4185.328 ± 3907.204 |
Outcome Measures
| 1. Primary: | Change From Baseline at 18 Month Endpoint in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) [ 18 month endpoint ] |
| 2. Secondary: | Change From Baseline at 18 Month Endpoint in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Female Subset [ 18 month endpoint ] |
| 3. Secondary: | Time Course of Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Women and Men Combined [ 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36 months ] |
Hide Outcome Measure 3| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Time Course of Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Women and Men Combined |
| Measure Description | change from baseline in bone mineral density of the lumbar spine as assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) |
| Time Frame | 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36 months |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| The intention-to-treat analysis was performed using all randomized and treated patients. No missing data were imputed. |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Teriparatide | Teriparatide 20 micrograms/day injection plus oral placebo, 36 months |
| Alendronate | Alendronate 10 mg/day oral plus injection placebo, 36 months |
| Teriparatide | Alendronate | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
198 | 195 |
|
Time Course of Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Women and Men Combined
[units: grams per square centimeters] Least Squares Mean ± Standard Error |
||
| Change from baseline at Month 36 (N=123,N=112) | 0.090 ± 0.006 | 0.044 ± 0.007 |
| Change from baseline at Month 24 (N=136,N=131) | 0.081 ± 0.006 | 0.043 ± 0.006 |
| Change from baseline at Month 18 (N=156,N=148) | 0.066 ± 0.005 | 0.031 ± 0.005 |
| Change from baseline at Month 12 (N=170,N=159) | 0.054 ± 0.004 | 0.028 ± 0.004 |
| Change from baseline at Month 6 (N=178,N=173) | 0.034 ± 0.004 | 0.018 ± 0.004 |
| Change from baseline at Month 3 (N=183,N=184) | 0.019 ± 0.004 | 0.012 ± 0.004 |
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | Mixed Models Analysis |
| P Value [3] | 0.058 |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Mixed Model Repeated Measures: Change in BMD=treatment+region+prior bisphosphonate use+gender+baseline BMD+visit+treatment*visit. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| Least Squares Means obtained from the treatment*visit interaction term from the above mixed model repeated measures model. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| P-value for Month 3 |
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | Mixed Models Analysis |
| P Value [3] | <0.001 |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Mixed Model Repeated Measures: Change in BMD=treatment+region+prior bisphosphonate use+gender+baseline BMD+visit+treatment*visit. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| Least Squares Means obtained from the treatment*visit interaction term from the above mixed model repeated measures model. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| P-value for 6 months |
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | Mixed Models Analysis |
| P Value [3] | <0.001 |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Mixed Model Repeated Measures: Change in BMD=treatment+region+prior bisphosphonate use+gender+baseline BMD+visit+treatment*visit. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| Least Squares Means obtained from the treatment*visit interaction term from the above mixed model repeated measures model. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| P-value for 12 months |
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | Mixed Models Analysis |
| P Value [3] | <0.001 |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Mixed Model Repeated Measures: Change in BMD=treatment+region+prior bisphosphonate use+gender+baseline BMD+visit+treatment*visit. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| Least Squares Means obtained from the treatment*visit interaction term from the above mixed model repeated measures model. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| P-value for 18 months |
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | Mixed Models Analysis |
| P Value [3] | <0.001 |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Mixed Model Repeated Measures: Change in BMD=treatment+region+prior bisphosphonate use+gender+baseline BMD+visit+treatment*visit. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| Least Squares Means obtained from the treatment*visit interaction term from the above mixed model repeated measures model. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| P-value for 24 months |
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | Mixed Models Analysis |
| P Value [3] | <0.001 |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Mixed Model Repeated Measures: Change in BMD=treatment+region+prior bisphosphonate use+gender+baseline BMD+visit+treatment*visit. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| Least Squares Means obtained from the treatment*visit interaction term from the above mixed model repeated measures model. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| P-value for 36 months |
| 4. Secondary: | Time Course of Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Female Subset [ 3, 6, 12, and 18 months ] |
| 5. Secondary: | Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Women and Men Combined [ 24 and 36 months and Endpoint at 36 months ] |
| 6. Secondary: | Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Women and Men Combined [ 18, 24, 36 months, and 18 and 36 month endpoints ] |
| 7. Secondary: | Change From Baseline in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Women and Men Combined [ 18, 24, 36 months, and 18 and 36 month endpoints ] |
| 8. Secondary: | Time Course of Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Women and Men Combined [ 12, 18, 24, and 36 months ] |
| 9. Secondary: | Time Course of Change From Baseline in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Women and Men Combined [ 12, 18, 24, and 36 months ] |
| 10. Secondary: | Time Course of Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers in Subset of Patients - Serum N-terminal Propeptide of Type 1 Procollagen [ 1, 6, 18, and 36 months ] |
| 11. Secondary: | Time Course of Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers in Subset of Patients - Serum C-terminal Propeptide of Type 1 Procollagen [ 1, 6, 18, and 36 months ] |
| 12. Secondary: | Time Course of Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers in Subset of Patients - Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase [ 1, 6, 18, and 36 months ] |
| 13. Secondary: | Time Course of Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers in Subset of Patients - Serum Type 1 Collagen Degradation Fragments [ 1, 6, 18, and 36 months ] |
| 14. Secondary: | Time Course of Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers in Subset of Patients - Osteocalcin [ 1, 6, 18, and 36 months ] |
| 15. Secondary: | Any Fracture, Nonvertebral Fractures, Vertebral Fractures, Clinical Vertebral Fractures, and Severity Fractures [ 36 months ] |
More Information
| Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. | ||||||
| There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. | ||||||
The agreement is:
|
| Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data |
|---|
| No text entered. |
| Responsible Party: | Eli Lilly ( Chief Medical Officer ) |
| Study ID Numbers: | 6484, B3D-US-GHBZ |
| Study First Received: | January 13, 2003 |
| Results First Received: | January 14, 2009 |
| Last Updated: | February 13, 2009 |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00051558 History of Changes |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |