Traumatic Optic Neuropathy Treatment Trial (TONTT)
| Tracking Information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Received Date ICMJE | February 1, 2013 | ||||
| Last Updated Date | May 20, 2013 | ||||
| Start Date ICMJE | February 2011 | ||||
| Estimated Primary Completion Date | February 2016 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Visual function [ Time Frame: change from baseline until 3 months after treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] Visual Acuity, Relative Afferent Pupillary Defect, and Color vision 1,2,3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks and 1,3 months after treatment |
||||
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
| Change History | Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01783847 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site | ||||
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Visual Field [ Time Frame: Change from baseline 3 months after treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] Since visual acuity might be too low to allow testing visual field, it will be performed if the visual acuity is good enough for such a test. |
||||
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
| Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Descriptive Information | |||||
| Brief Title ICMJE | Traumatic Optic Neuropathy Treatment Trial (TONTT) | ||||
| Official Title ICMJE | Study of Visual Recovery After Erythropoietin (EPO) Injection, Steroid Injection or Observation in Patients With Traumatic Optic Neuropathy (TON) | ||||
| Brief Summary | The pathophysiology of Traumatic Optic Neuropathy (TON) is thought to be multifactorial, and some researchers have also postulated a primary and secondary mechanism of injury.TON is categorized as direct or indirect.In indirect TON cases, the injury to the axons is thought to be induced by shearing forces that are transmitted to the fibers or to the vascular supply of the nerve. Studies have shown that forces applied to the frontal bone and malar eminences are transferred and concentrated in the area near the optic canal. The tight adherence of the optic nerve's dural sheath to the periosteum within the optic canal is also thought to contribute to this segment of the nerve being extremely susceptible to the deformative stresses of the skull bones. Such injury leads to ischemic injury to the axons of the retinal ganglion cells within the optic canal. At present, no studies validate a particular approach to the management of TON. There are three management lines for these patients that include 1)observation only;2)medical treatment with high or megadoses of methylprednisolone; and 3)surgical intervention. Generally no line precedes the others and additionally, medical or surgical interventions may result in serious side effects or complications. In 2005, the results of the Corticosteroid Randomization after Significant Head Injury (CRASH) trial raised concerns regarding the use of mega dose steroids in traumatic brain injury. This study was the largest randomized study that evaluated steroids in patients with traumatic brain injury and was stopped early due to the significantly increased risk of death in patients that received mega dose steroids at their 6-month follow-up when compared with the placebo group (25.7% vs 22.3%; Relative Risk 1.15 Confidence Interval 1.07 to 1.24; p=0.0001). Although the etiology of the increased risk of death was not determined, the findings of this study should be taken into consideration when managing cases of TON with concurrent traumatic brain injury. Very recently it has been shown the cytokine hormone erythropoietin (EPO) that had been long known and used as a valuable agent to promote hematopoiesis has been protective in experimental models of mechanical trauma, neuroinflammation, cerebral and retinal ischemia, and even in a human stroke trial, and most notably in optic nerve transection. A double blind placebo-controlled multicenter trial on EPO add-on treatment in chronic schizophrenic men was performed. Treatment over 12 weeks with high-dose weekly (40,000 IU intravenously) EPO led to significant improvement of cognitive performance compared to placebo controls. Different studies have been performed on the effect of EPO on neuropathy in different studies. The investigators recently published our results on treating patients with TON with EPO and found it safe and effective. Patients were compared with a historical control group of patients who received no treatment for TON. A better visual recovery was found. 20 The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of EPO with steroid and observation in TON in a Multi- center randomized clinical trial. |
||||
| Detailed Description | Not Provided | ||||
| Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||
| Study Phase | Phase 2 | ||||
| Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
||||
| Condition ICMJE | Traumatic Optic Neuropathy | ||||
| Intervention ICMJE |
|
||||
| Study Arm (s) |
|
||||
| Publications * | Not Provided | ||||
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||
| Recruitment Information | |||||
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Recruiting | ||||
| Estimated Enrollment ICMJE | 100 | ||||
| Estimated Completion Date | April 2016 | ||||
| Estimated Primary Completion Date | February 2016 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||
| Gender | Both | ||||
| Ages | 6 Years to 90 Years | ||||
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No | ||||
| Contacts ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Location Countries ICMJE | Iran, Islamic Republic of | ||||
| Administrative Information | |||||
| NCT Number ICMJE | NCT01783847 | ||||
| Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | 90-01-124-12972 | ||||
| Has Data Monitoring Committee | Yes | ||||
| Responsible Party | Tehran University of Medical Sciences | ||||
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | Tehran University of Medical Sciences | ||||
| Collaborators ICMJE |
|
||||
| Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||
| Information Provided By | Tehran University of Medical Sciences | ||||
| Verification Date | May 2013 | ||||
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|||||