Feasibility of a Lateral Flow Urine LAM Test for Diagnosis of Tuberculosis in South Africa

The recruitment status of this study is unknown because the information has not been verified recently.
Verified September 2012 by Tuberculosis Clinical Diagnostics Research Consortium.
Recruitment status was  Active, not recruiting
Sponsor:
Collaborator:
University of Cape Town
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Tuberculosis Clinical Diagnostics Research Consortium
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01693224
First received: September 23, 2012
Last updated: NA
Last verified: September 2012
History: No changes posted

September 23, 2012
September 23, 2012
April 2011
February 2013   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
  • Sensitivity of the lateral-flow urine LAM assay (LF-LAM) [ Time Frame: One year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    • Conventional TB tests (mycobacterial blood & sputum culture) will be the reference standard used to calculate sensitivity of the LF-LAM test
    • Sensitivity is defined as TP/(TP+FN), or the number of true positives over (the number of true positives + the number of false negatives)
    • "true positive" = a positive LF-LAM result in a patient also having ≥1 culture positive for M. tuberculosis
    • "false negative" = a negative LF-LAM result in a patient also having ≥1 culture positive for M. tuberculosis
  • Failure rate of the lateral-flow urine LAM assay [ Time Frame: One year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Failure rate expressed as the proportion of lateral flow urine LAM tests that require repeating due to an unevaluable initial result
  • Inter-reader variability of the lateral-flow urine LAM assay [ Time Frame: One year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Expressed as the percent agreement
  • Specificity of the lateral-flow urine LAM assay (LF-LAM) [ Time Frame: One year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    • Conventional TB tests (blood & sputum culture) will be the reference standard used to calculate specificity (Sp) of the LF-LAM
    • Sp=TN/(TN+FP), or #true negatives / (#true negatives + #false positives)
    • "true negative" = negative LF-LAM in "Not TB" patient
    • "false positive" = positive LF-LAM in "Not TB" patient
    • "Not TB" = meets all criteria below

      • no sputum/blood culture positive for MTB
      • no smear microscopy positive for acid-fast bacilli
      • no granulomas/caseous necrosis on histopathology
      • no clinical response to TB treatment
      • a plausible alternative diagnosis
Same as current
No Changes Posted
  • Sensitivity of the ELISA-based urine LAM test [ Time Frame: One year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    • Conventional TB tests (mycobacterial blood & sputum culture) will be the reference standard used to calculate sensitivity of the ELISA LAM test
    • Sensitivity is defined as TP/(TP+FN), or the number of true positives over (the number of true positives + the number of false negatives)
    • "true positive" = a positive ELISA LAM result in a patient also having ≥1 culture positive for M. tuberculosis
    • "false negative" = a negative ELISA LAM result in a patient also having ≥1 culture positive for M. tuberculosis
  • Diagnostic yield (expressed as number of TB cases detected) of various diagnostic strategies (see description) [ Time Frame: One year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Diagnostic yield will be measured for strategies including a) lateral flow urine LAM testing plus sputum smear microscopy; b) ELISA urine LAM testing plus sputum smear microscopy; c) sputum smear microscopy plus sputum culture; d) sputum culture plus mycobacterial blood culture.
  • Time to diagnosis (expressed in days) of various diagnostic strategies (see description) [ Time Frame: One year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Time to diagnosis will be measured for strategies including a) lateral flow urine LAM testing plus sputum smear microscopy; b) ELISA urine LAM testing plus sputum smear microscopy; c) sputum smear microscopy plus sputum culture; d) sputum culture plus mycobacterial blood culture.
  • Accuracy, efficiency, costs, and cost-effectiveness of various combinations of TB diagnostic tests [ Time Frame: One year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    TB diagnostic tests to be included in this analysis: sputum smear microscopy, sputum culture, mycobacterial blood culture, chest X-ray, lateral-flow urine LAM testing, ELISA urine LAM testing, and Xpert MTB/Rif.
  • Satisfaction of lateral-flow urine LAM test operators [ Time Frame: One year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Based on questionnaire assessment
  • Specificity (Sp) of the ELISA-based urine LAM test [ Time Frame: One year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    • Conventional TB tests (blood & sputum culture) will be the reference standard used to calculate Sp of ELISA LAM
    • Sp=TN/(TN+FP), or #true negatives / (#true negatives + #false positives)
    • "true negative" = negative ELISA LAM in "Not TB" patient
    • "false positive" = positive ELISA LAM in "Not TB" patient
    • "Not TB" = meets all criteria below

      • no sputum/blood culture positive for MTB
      • no smear microscopy positive for acid-fast bacilli
      • no granulomas/caseous necrosis on histopathology
      • no clinical response to TB treatment
      • a plausible alternative diagnosis
  • Sensitivity of the Xpert MTB/Rif test to detect MTB in blood [ Time Frame: One year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

    Conventional mycobacterial blood culture will be the reference standard used to calculate sensitivity of Xpert MTB/Rif in blood

    • Sensitivity is defined as TP/(TP+FN), or the number of true positives over (the number of true positives + the number of false negatives)
    • "true positive" = a positive Xpert MTB/Rif result in a patient also having ≥1 mycobacterial blood culture positive for M. tuberculosis
    • "false negative" = a negative Xpert MTB/Rif result in a patient also having ≥1 mycobacterial blood culture positive for M. tuberculosis
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Feasibility of a Lateral Flow Urine LAM Test for Diagnosis of Tuberculosis in South Africa
Feasibility of Using the Inverness Lateral Flow Urine LAM Test for Diagnosis of Tuberculosis in HIV-Positive TB Suspects in Cape Town, South Africa

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy, diagnostic yield, operational performance, and time to diagnosis of a novel lateral-flow urine LAM test in detecting tuberculosis in HIV-infected adults.

A secondary study objective is to evaluate the accuracy and diagnostic yield of the Cepheid Xpert MTB/Rif test in detecting tuberculosis in the blood of HIV-infected adults.

Background: Tuberculosis (TB) incidence and mortality have increased dramatically as a result of the HIV epidemic. In parts of sub-Saharan Africa, TB is the leading cause of death among HIV-infected patients and approximately 50% of TB patients are HIV co-infected. Early treatment of TB is hindered by the lack of rapid, accurate diagnostic modalities that can be applied in resource-constrained settings. Mycobacterial culture is the laboratory standard for diagnosis of active TB, but it is costly, requires access to specialized laboratories, and takes weeks to provide results. Sputum smear microscopy detects less than half of HIV-infected TB cases in many settings. The Global Plan to Stop TB has prioritized the development of simple, accurate, inexpensive tests for TB case detection in HIV-positive individuals.

LAM: As a strategy for rapid TB diagnosis, the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigens has been explored over several decades. Lipoarabinomannan (LAM), a glycolipid component of the outer cell wall of mycobacteria, is an attractive diagnostic target for several reasons: it is heat-stable; cleared by the kidney; detectable in urine; and as a bacterial product, has the theoretical potential to discriminate active TB from latent TB infection independent of human immune responses. A urine test could facilitate TB diagnosis in patients in whom sputum is uninformative or not obtainable, and lacks the infection-control risks associated with sputum production or blood collection. Urine LAM detection may be amenable to simple, rapid, inexpensive point-of-care platforms.

This is a prospective study to evaluate the accuracy, diagnostic yield, operational performance, and time to diagnosis of a novel lateral-flow urine LAM test in detecting tuberculosis in HIV-infected adults. HIV-positive adults suspected to have TB will be enrolled after providing informed consent. Urine will be obtained for testing using the novel lateral flow urine LAM assay and an existing ELISA-based urine LAM assay. Conventional microbiological tests for TB and chest x-rays will also be performed. These tests will be performed on all participants enrolled (target sample size = 500).

A secondary study objective is to determine the accuracy and diagnostic yield of the Cepheid Xpert MTB/Rif test in detecting tuberculosis in the blood of HIV-infected adults (the same set of participants on whom the LAM testing is done; approximate sample size = 500).

Interventional
Not Provided
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Tuberculosis
  • Tuberculosis, Pulmonary
  • Tuberculosis, Miliary
  • Device: Alere "Determine" lateral-flow urine lipoarabinomannan assay

    lateral-flow (point-of-care) urine test to detect the lipoarabinomannan (LAM) component of the M. tuberculosis antigen in the urine of TB suspects, in vitro.

    Manufacturer: Alere

    Other Name: Determine lateral-flow urine LAM TB test
  • Device: Alere "Clearview" ELISA urine LAM assay

    ELISA-based urine test to detect the lipoarabinomannan component of the M. tuberculosis antigen in the urine of TB suspects, in vitro.

    Manufacturer: Alere.

    Other Name: Clearview ELISA urine LAM TB test
  • Device: Cepheid Xpert MTB/Rif assay
    Other Name: Cepheid Xpert MTB/Rif test
Not Provided
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Active, not recruiting
512
February 2013
February 2013   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria (Individuals must meet all of the following inclusion criteria in order to be eligible to participate):

  • Informed consent
  • Suspected active tuberculosis
  • Willingness and ability to comply with study procedures
  • Any one or more of the following:

    • Current cough
    • Fever at any time within the preceding 4 weeks
    • Night sweats at any time within the preceding 4 weeks
    • Weight loss within the preceding 4 weeks
  • HIV-positive based on any one or more of the following:

    • written results of a positive HIV antibody test, and/or
    • written results of a positive HIV viral load, and/or
    • documentation in the medical record of positive HIV status by a treating clinician.

Exclusion Criteria (Any subjects meeting any of the following exclusion criteria at baseline will be excluded from study participation):

  • Multidrug tuberculosis treatment for greater than two days within the previous 60 days
  • Unwillingness or inability to provide a urine sample
  • Known chronic pulmonary condition, e.g. asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, emphysema
  • Respiratory distress, defined as respiratory rate of >30 or oxygen saturation <90%
  • Any specific condition that in the judgment of the investigator precludes participation because it could affect a subject's safety.
Both
18 Years and older
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
South Africa
 
NCT01693224
DMID 10-0051, NA_00043138
No
Tuberculosis Clinical Diagnostics Research Consortium
Tuberculosis Clinical Diagnostics Research Consortium
University of Cape Town
Study Chair: Susan Dorman, MD Johns Hopkins University
Principal Investigator: Mark Nicol, MBChB, PhD University of Cape Town, Faculty of Health Sciences, Dept. of Medical Microbiology, Cape Town, South Africa
Principal Investigator: Mischka Moodley, MBChB, DTM&H, FCPath(Micro)SA University of Cape Town, Faculty of Health Sciences, Dept. of Medical Microbiology, Cape Town, South Africa
Tuberculosis Clinical Diagnostics Research Consortium
September 2012

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP