Now Available for Public Comment: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) for FDAAA 801 and NIH Draft Reporting Policy for NIH-Funded Trials

A Prospective Trial of Ultrasound Versus Landmark Guided Central Venous Access in the Pediatric Population

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Stanford University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01680666
First received: August 28, 2012
Last updated: September 4, 2012
Last verified: September 2012

August 28, 2012
September 4, 2012
May 2009
December 2011   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Success of central venous cannulation at first attempt. [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01680666 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Total number of venous cannulation attempts [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • Access time in seconds [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • Number of arterial punctures [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • Number of complications [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
A Prospective Trial of Ultrasound Versus Landmark Guided Central Venous Access in the Pediatric Population
A Prospective Randomized Trial of Ultrasound Versus Landmark Guided Central Venous Access in Children

The investigators hypothesized that, in children undergoing venous cannulation for central line placement by pediatric surgeons, ultrasound-guided cannulation leads to an increase in successful venous cannulation at first attempt compared to landmark guided cannulation.

Not Provided
Interventional
Not Provided
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Need for Central Venous Access
  • Procedure: central line placement
    central line placement
  • Device: Ultrasound
    Ultrasound guided central venous access
    Other Names:
    • Sonosite, Bothel, WA
    • Aloka, Wallingford, CT
  • Active Comparator: landmark guided
    central line placement
    Intervention: Procedure: central line placement
  • Active Comparator: ultrasound guided
    central line placement
    Interventions:
    • Procedure: central line placement
    • Device: Ultrasound
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
150
December 2011
December 2011   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients between the ages of 0 and 18 years undergoing tunneled central venous line placement under general anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Preoperative proof of non-patency of central veins
  • coagulopathy
  • access site surgeon
Both
up to 18 Years
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United States
 
NCT01680666
IRB-8943
No
Stanford University
Stanford University
Not Provided
Not Provided
Stanford University
September 2012

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP