Now Available for Public Comment: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) for FDAAA 801 and NIH Draft Reporting Policy for NIH-Funded Trials

Drawing the Line Between Medium Care and Intensive Care. A Prospective Observational Study Based on the Nursing Activities Score

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Greet Van den Berghe, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01633606
First received: July 2, 2012
Last updated: January 28, 2014
Last verified: January 2014

July 2, 2012
January 28, 2014
February 2013
September 2013   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
most discriminative NAS cut off for identifying medium care patient versus intensive care patient [ Time Frame: 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Not Provided
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01633606 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Drawing the Line Between Medium Care and Intensive Care. A Prospective Observational Study Based on the Nursing Activities Score
Drawing the Line Between Medium Care and Intensive Care. A Prospective Observational Study Based on the Nursing Activities Score

The aim of the study is to develop a screening instrument, based on the nursing activities score, by which we can distinguish medium care patients from the intensive care patients in terms of nurse staffing.

The main study question is: What is the most discriminative NAS cut off for medium care patient?

Each nursing shift the NAS and TISS 28 scores will be calculated for each patient who is admitted to the 8 participating units.

Nurses will be asked to answer 3 questions (see detailed description here under)at the end of their working shift concerning each patient appointed to them.

Each morning medical staff and head nurses will be asked 2 questions (see detailed description here under) for concerning patient admitted to there ward.

In order to determine the NAS cut off for medium care patient, all morning questionnaire scores will be compared to the NAS an TISS28 scores of that same morning.

Secondary study questions are:

  • Can NAS score based on one nursing shift predict the severity of care in the subsequent nursing shift?
  • Is there a difference in appreciation of severity of care between nurses, head nurses and medical staff?
  • Which variables influence the perception of severity of care?
  • How does NAS relate to TISS28, APACHE and NEMS?

Nursing questionnaire:

  1. How many beds were appointed to you?

    1. 1
    2. 2
    3. 3
    4. 4
    5. 5
    6. 6
  2. For how many of such patients you could care for maximally?

    1. 1
    2. 2
    3. 3
    4. 4
    5. >4
  3. This patients' burden of care corresponds to:

    1. An intensive care patient who requires more than standard intensive care
    2. An intensive care patient who requires standard intensive care
    3. A medium care patient

medical staff and head nurse questionaire:

  1. For how many of such patients you could care for maximally?

    1. 1
    2. 2
    3. 3
    4. 4
    5. >4
  2. This patients' burden of care corresponds to?

    1. An intensive care patient who requires more than standard intensive care
    2. An intensive care patient who requires standard intensive care
    3. A medium care patient
Observational
Observational Model: Cohort
Time Perspective: Prospective
Not Provided
Not Provided
Probability Sample

acute patients

Critical Illness
Not Provided
Acute patients
Patients admitted to the surgical and general ICU (including burn unit), to the coronary care unit, to the emergency department high care zone, to the medical ICU, to the medical medium care unit
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
1000
September 2013
September 2013   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • admission to one of the 9 critical area's
Both
Not Provided
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Not Provided
 
NCT01633606
NAS-ICU-2012
No
Greet Van den Berghe, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
Not Provided
Study Director: Greet Van den Berghe, MD PhD Catholic University Leuven
Principal Investigator: Karen Decock, RS Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
January 2014

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP