Child Health Improvement Through Computer Automation (CHICA) Highlighting Study
| Tracking Information | |
|---|---|
| First Received Date ICMJE | April 18, 2012 |
| Last Updated Date | November 13, 2012 |
| Start Date ICMJE | April 2012 |
| Primary Completion Date | October 2012 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Increased prompt response [ Time Frame: 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] The main outcome of interest is whether or not a prompt was answered (discussed/not discussed). |
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current |
| Change History | Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01583101 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site |
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided |
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided |
| Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided |
| Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided |
| Descriptive Information | |
| Brief Title ICMJE | Child Health Improvement Through Computer Automation (CHICA) Highlighting Study |
| Official Title ICMJE | Increasing Prompt Response Rates in the CHICA System |
| Brief Summary | The investigators have developed a novel decision support system for implementing clinical guidelines in pediatric practice. CHICA (Child Health Improvement through Computer Automation) combines three elements: (1) pediatric guidelines encoded in Arden Syntax; (2) a dynamic, scannable paper user interface; and (3) an HL7-compliant interface to existing electronic medical record systems. The result is a system that both delivers "just-in-time" patient-relevant guidelines to physicians during the clinical encounter, and accurately captures structured data from all who interact with it. Preliminary work with CHICA has demonstrated the feasibility of using the system to implement and evaluate clinical guidelines. However, analyses have shown that physicians ignore a fair number of prompts. The investigators would like to experiment with changes to the system to see if they can increase physicians' response rates. This could include highlighting prompts, reordering them, or flagging them in other ways. The main outcome of interest in the rate at which physicians answer prompts. |
| Detailed Description | We have developed a novel decision support system for implementing clinical guidelines in pediatric practice. CHICA (Child Health Improvement through Computer Automation) combines three elements: (1) pediatric guidelines encoded in Arden Syntax; (2) a dynamic, scannable paper user interface; and (3) an HL7-compliant interface to existing electronic medical record systems. The result is a system that both delivers "just-in-time" patient-relevant guidelines to physicians during the clinical encounter, and accurately captures structured data from all who interact with it. Preliminary work with CHICA has demonstrated the feasibility of using the system to implement and evaluate clinical guidelines. However, analyses have shown that physicians ignore a fair number of prompts. We would like to experiment with changes to the system to see if we can increase physicians' response rates. This could include highlighting prompts, reordering them, or flagging them in other ways. The main outcome of interest is the rate at which physicians answer prompts. This will be a randomized, controlled trial of the CHICA system to see if we can improve prompt response rates. We will randomize physicians or clinics to receive some form of prompt change, including highlighting them, reordering them, or flagging them. No other changes will be made to care. We will extract data from the CHICA system for all patients seen in our study clinics. This data will include a the clinic location, whether or not a physician responded to a prompt, the prompt's position on the form, the patient's gender, the rule priority of the prompt, rule title, patient insurance category, the patient's age in days, and the name of the provider. The main outcome of interest is whether or not a prompt was answered (discussed/not discussed). |
| Study Type ICMJE | Interventional |
| Study Phase | Not Provided |
| Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Health Services Research |
| Condition ICMJE | Physician Behavior |
| Intervention ICMJE |
|
| Study Arm (s) |
|
| Publications * | Not Provided |
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|
| Recruitment Information | |
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Completed |
| Enrollment ICMJE | 2237 |
| Completion Date | October 2012 |
| Primary Completion Date | October 2012 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
| Gender | Both |
| Ages | Not Provided |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers | Yes |
| Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects |
| Location Countries ICMJE | United States |
| Administrative Information | |
| NCT Number ICMJE | NCT01583101 |
| Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | CHICA_Highlight_Study |
| Has Data Monitoring Committee | No |
| Responsible Party | Aaron Carroll, Indiana University |
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | Indiana University |
| Collaborators ICMJE | Not Provided |
| Investigators ICMJE | Not Provided |
| Information Provided By | Indiana University |
| Verification Date | November 2012 |
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|