Music Pacing in Pediatric Exercise Testing

The recruitment status of this study is unknown because the information has not been verified recently.
Verified April 2012 by Sheba Medical Center.
Recruitment status was  Not yet recruiting
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Gal Raz-Dubnov MD, MSc, Sheba Medical Center
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01576913
First received: April 11, 2012
Last updated: NA
Last verified: April 2012
History: No changes posted

April 11, 2012
April 11, 2012
April 2012
May 2013   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
peak VO2 [ Time Frame: end of the exercise test, approx.10 minutes ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
peak Vo2 is the maximal oxygen consumption obtained during the exercise test, reflecting the level of aerobic fintess
Same as current
No Changes Posted
  • peak power [ Time Frame: exercise test duration, approx.10 minutes ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    maximal power obtained at the end of the exercise test
  • anaerobic threshold [ Time Frame: exercise test duration, approx.10 minutes ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    point of increase in anaerobic metabolism
  • rating of perceived exertion [ Time Frame: exercise test duration, approx.10 minutes ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    scale of perceived effort
  • mechanical efficiency [ Time Frame: exercise test duration, approx.10 minutes ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    oxygen consumption per work load
  • cadence [ Time Frame: exercise test duration, approx.10 minutes ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    pedaling rate
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Music Pacing in Pediatric Exercise Testing
Music Pacing in Pediatric Exercise Testing

Study hypothesis: Music pacing improves the quality of exercise testing in children.

Children tend to cycle in a non-constant pace during exercise testing, which might make the test less reliable.

20 boys will perform two exercise tests on a cycle ergometer. One test will be done with constant tempoed music, and the other without. Different parameters will be checked including pedaling cadence, aerobic fitness, level of work load obtained.

Not Provided
Interventional
Not Provided
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment
Masking: Single Blind (Investigator)
Exercise Testing With Music Pacing
Other: Music listening
Listening to tempo music while cycling in an exercise test
  • Active Comparator: Music pacing
    Exercise testing with music pacing
    Intervention: Other: Music listening
  • No Intervention: No music pacing
    Exercise testing without music pacing
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Not yet recruiting
20
May 2013
May 2013   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • male sex
  • currently and generally healthy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • presence of chronic disease/ medication use
  • BMI above 85%
  • trained/competitive cyclists
Male
8 Years to 12 Years
Yes
Contact: Gal Dubnov-Raz, MD, MSc 972-54-4570250 Gal-d@bezeqint.net
Israel
 
NCT01576913
SHEBA-12-9340-GDR-CTIL
No
Gal Raz-Dubnov MD, MSc, Sheba Medical Center
Sheba Medical Center
Not Provided
Principal Investigator: Gal Dubnov-Raz, MD, MSc Sheba Medical Center
Sheba Medical Center
April 2012

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP