The Effect of Liposomal Lidocaine on Perceived Pain in Children During Percutaneous Interosseous Pin Removal in the Outpatient Setting

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
University of Alberta
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01542125
First received: December 15, 2011
Last updated: February 29, 2012
Last verified: February 2012

December 15, 2011
February 29, 2012
September 2008
February 2011   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Pain [ Time Frame: Before the application of Liposomal Lidocaine and immediately after Pin Perc removal, approximately 30 minutes ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Pain was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (caregivers and technician) and the Oucher Scale (children).

The average time between the application of Liposomal Lidocaine and the removal of the pin perc was 30 minutes. Pain was assessed prior to the application of Liposomal lidocaine and immediately after the pinc perc removal.

Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01542125 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
The Effect of Liposomal Lidocaine on Perceived Pain in Children During Percutaneous Interosseous Pin Removal in the Outpatient Setting
The Effect of Liposomal Lidocaine on Perceived Pain in Children During Percutaneous Interosseous Pin Removal in the Outpatient Setting: A Triple Blinded, Randomized Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial

The removal of smooth, percutaneous pins (Perc Pins), which are used for fracture fixation, occurs once adequate bone healing has taken place. At the Stollery Children's Hospital (SCH), this frequently performed procedure is currently done without anesthetic, making it a painful and uncomfortable experience for the child and their caregiver(s). Liposomal Lidocaine is a relatively new effective and "needle-free" topical anesthetic. The investigators were interested in examining its effectiveness in pain reduction in children undergoing Perc Pin removal. Objective: To determine if Liposomal Lidocaine is effective in reducing pain in a pediatric population undergoing Perc Pin removal compared to a placebo. Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that Liposomal Lidocaine would significantly reduce pain during Perc Pin removal compared to a placebo. Research Design: This was a triple-blinded, randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial with 281 patients (140 patients each in the Maxilene and 141 in the Placebo groups). Pain measurements, using the Oucher Scale (children) and a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (parents and caregivers) were collected prior to randomization and immediately after Perc Pin removal. Data was analyzed using a Student's t-test and the Wilcoxon signed ranks test.

Not Provided
Interventional
Phase 4
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Pain
  • Drug: Liposomal Lidocaine
    4% Liposomal Lidocaine
    Other Name: Maxilene
  • Drug: Placebo
    Tubes were visually identical to the Liposomal Lidocaine tubes.
  • Experimental: Liposomal Lidocaine group
    Patients in this groups received 4% Liposomal Lidocaine that was applied to the area immediately surrounding the pin site(s) and was covered with an opaque Tegaderm dressing
    Intervention: Drug: Liposomal Lidocaine
  • Placebo Comparator: Placebo Group
    This group received a placebo that was applied to the area immediately surrounding the pin site(s) and was covered with an opaque Tegaderm dressing.
    Intervention: Drug: Placebo
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
281
February 2011
February 2011   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children between 3 and 16 years of age (i.e. up to but not including the 17th birthday) who present to the Pediatric Plaster Room at the SCH for Perc Pin removal were eligible for inclusion in this study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any patient with Perc Pins that are threaded (not smooth), as these pins require a more difficult removal process, oftentimes in the operating room instead of the orthopedic clinic.
  • Infection around the Perc Pins: This is considered a relative contraindication to the use of topical anesthetic as it is usually less effective in this situation.
  • Any parents/patients unable to exhibit understanding of the Oucher/VAS -- due to language barriers or developmental delay in the patient (e.g. severe cerebral palsy).
  • The presence of an open wound in the vicinity of the pins that could not be excluded from the area to which the topical anesthetic cream is to be applied.
  • Present use of analgesic or anxiolytic medications (within 24 hours prior to pin removal)
  • Known allergies or adverse reactions to Maxilene
Both
3 Years to 16 Years
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Not Provided
 
NCT01542125
RES0002737
No
University of Alberta
University of Alberta
Not Provided
Principal Investigator: Sukhdeep Dulai, FRCSC University of Alberta
University of Alberta
February 2012

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP