Ultrasound Guided Needling Versus Ultrasound Guided Corticosteroid Injection Alone, a Randomized Controlled Trial. (BARB-01)

This study is currently recruiting participants.
Verified July 2012 by Medisch Spectrum Twente
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Eva Genbrugge, Medisch Spectrum Twente
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01538758
First received: November 30, 2011
Last updated: July 11, 2012
Last verified: July 2012

November 30, 2011
July 11, 2012
July 2012
July 2013   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
  • VAS score on long term [ Time Frame: 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Constant score on long term [ Time Frame: 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    The constant score is a validated scale, measuring the shoulder function. It is a objective measurement independent of the shoulder pain.
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01538758 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Constant score [ Time Frame: baseline,6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    To have a more insight over time the constant score will be measured at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months
  • VAS score [ Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

    To have a more insight over time the VAS score will be measured at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months.

    In practice patients seem to have a maximum pain shortly after the us guided needling. To measure this a VAS score will be taken after two weeks.

  • DASH score [ Time Frame: baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    This score measures the disability of the shoulder in daily life, work, sports and hobby over time.
  • Gärtner score of the shoulder calcifications on x-ray [ Time Frame: at baseline, directly post-interventional, at 6 weeks and one year. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Scoring system presented by Chiou et all. of the calcifications of the supraspinatus tendon on ultrasound [ Time Frame: at baseline, directly post-interventional, at 6 weeks and one year. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Ultrasound Guided Needling Versus Ultrasound Guided Corticosteroid Injection Alone, a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Treatment of Calcifying Tendinitis of the Shoulder: Ultrasound Guided Needling With Subacromial Corticosteroid Injection Versus Ultrasound Guided Subacromial Corticosteroid Injection Only, a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Ultrasound guided needling is becoming an accepted treatment for patients with shoulder pain due to calcifying tendinitis. However, evidence for this treatment is lacking. The investigators expect that patients treated with us guided needling with corticosteroid injection compared with patients treated with only corticosteroid injections in the subacromial bursa have better clinical outcome after one year follow-up.

Calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder is a common cause of shoulder pain with an incidence ranging from 2.7 % to 6.8 %. This disease of the rotator cuff tendons is characterised by calcifications in the tendons, most commonly in the supraspinatus tendon up to 82%. The aetiology remains unclear.

Calcifying tendinitis is regarded as a self-healing condition with usually spontaneous resolution of the calcifications. But some patients have chronic or recurrent pain and disability of the shoulder which requires treatment. The treatment should be minimally invasive and effective in short and long term. Symptomatic treatment is indicated first using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, therapeutic exercise and non ultrasound guided subacromial corticosteroids injection.

The role of corticosteroid injections is unknown due to the lack of good studies. Family doctors and orthopaedic surgeons inject corticosteroids in the shoulder without the guidance of ultrasound; with this method accurate needle placement in the subacromial bursa is not possible. When this treatment fails other therapeutical methods can be used. Ultrasound guided needling is a percutaneous technique of fragmentation or extraction of calcifications in the rotator cuff tendon.

Literature shows favourable results but only a few randomized controlled trials were executed. Randomised controlled trials are needed to give more insight in the effectiveness of us guided needling. Comparing two groups of patients treated with us guided corticosteroid injection and one group combined with us guided needling can provide information of the usefulness of us guided needling.

Interventional
Not Provided
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Calcific Tendinitis
  • Other: Us guided needling

    Us guided needling is a therapeutical technique treating calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder. Calcifications in the rotator cuff tendon are visualised with ultrasound. Under ultrasound guidance a 20 gauge needle is inserted in the calcification. Lidocaine 1% in a 1cc syringe is injected in the calcification and aspirated. The calcification is flushed until the fluid is clear. Sometimes it is not possible to flush the calcification. In this case the calcification will be fragmented.

    After flushing or fragmentation of the calcification, 20 mg triamcinolone with 1cc lidocaine 1% will be injected in de subacromial bursa under us guidance.

    Other Name: Barbotage
  • Other: corticosteroid injection
    Us guided subacromial bursa injection with 20 mg triamcinolone with 1cc lidocaine 1%.
  • Active Comparator: Us guided needling

    Us guided needling is a therapeutical technique treating calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder. Calcifications in the rotator cuff tendon are visualised with ultrasound. Under ultrasound guidance a 20 gauge needle is inserted in the calcification. Lidocaine 1% in a 1cc syringe is injected in the calcification and aspirated. The calcification is flushed until the fluid is clear. Sometimes it is not possible to flush the calcification. In this case the calcification will be fragmented.

    After flushing or fragmentation of the calcification, 20 mg triamcinolone with 1cc lidocaine 1% will be injected in de subacromial bursa under us guidance.

    Intervention: Other: Us guided needling
  • Active Comparator: corticosteroid injection
    Us guided subacromial bursa injection with 20 mg triamcinolone with 1cc lidocaine 1%.
    Intervention: Other: corticosteroid injection
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Recruiting
80
July 2014
July 2013   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Shoulder pain without improvement after 3 months despite conservative treatment
  • Calcification on x-ray (Gartner type I of II) and ultrasound in the supraspinatus tendon less than 6 weeks before the treatment
  • All patients are first seen and included by the orthopaedic surgeon

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous operation of the shoulder
  • Previous ultrasound guided needling of the shoulder
  • Frozen shoulder
  • Last corticosteroid injection less than 3 months ago
  • Comorbidities of the painful shoulder on x-ray or ultrasound ( ruptured tendon, fracture, bursitis,...)
  • No informed consent
  • Pregnancy
Both
18 Years and older
No
Contact: Eva Genbrugge, MD +31 53 4 87 20 00 eva_genbrugge@hotmail.com
Netherlands
 
NCT01538758
P12-03
Yes
Eva Genbrugge, Medisch Spectrum Twente
Medisch Spectrum Twente
Not Provided
Principal Investigator: Eva Genbrugge, MD MST
Medisch Spectrum Twente
July 2012

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP