The Effect of the Timing of Postoperative Mobilisation After Locking Plate Osteosynthesis of Fractures of the Surgical Neck of the Humerus

This study is currently recruiting participants.
Verified January 2012 by Helsinki University
Sponsor:
Collaborator:
National Institute for Health and Welfare, Finland
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Tuomas Lahdeoja, Helsinki University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01524965
First received: January 22, 2012
Last updated: January 31, 2012
Last verified: January 2012

January 22, 2012
January 31, 2012
May 2011
December 2013   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
  • Disablities of Arm, Hand and Shoulder [ Time Frame: 3 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Validated patient-reported upper extremity function scale
  • Disablities of Arm, Hand and Shoulder [ Time Frame: 6 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Validated patient-reported upper extremity function scale
  • Disablities of Arm, Hand and Shoulder [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Validated patient-reported upper extremity function scale
  • Disablities of Arm, Hand and Shoulder [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Validated patient-reported upper extremity function scale
  • Disablities of Arm, Hand and Shoulder [ Time Frame: 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Validated patient-reported upper extremity function scale
  • Disablities of Arm, Hand and Shoulder [ Time Frame: 2 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Validated patient-reported upper extremity function scale
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01524965 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Constant Score [ Time Frame: 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    subjective and objective shoulder score
  • Simple Shoulder Test (SST) [ Time Frame: 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    another shoulder score
  • Pain in rest and motion (2 different values) [ Time Frame: 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Numeric rating scale 0-10
  • Subjective satisfaction [ Time Frame: 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Patient reported, Numeric Rating Scale 0-10
  • Quality of Life [ Time Frame: 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Using the 15D instrument
  • Complications [ Time Frame: 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
    Complications of surgery and postoperative phase
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
The Effect of the Timing of Postoperative Mobilisation After Locking Plate Osteosynthesis of Fractures of the Surgical Neck of the Humerus
The Effect of the Timing of Postoperative Mobilisation After Locking Plate Osteosynthesis of Fractures of the Surgical Neck of the Humerus.

Open reduction and locking plate osteosynthesis is a commonly used and well-accepted treatment for displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. The shoulders tend to end stiff despite intensive rehabilitation, limiting the function of the upper extremity and decreasing the quality of life. The accepted postoperative mobilisation protocol includes passive exercises until six weeks postoperatively and active range of motion exercises after that. There is good evidence that conservatively treated fractures of the same site heal better and faster if mobilised immediately. The study compares "standard mobilisation" versus "immmediate mobilisation" in a prospective, randomized, controlled trial in order to find the optimal time-frame for physiotherapy to produce best possible results. Outcome measures are assessed at specific time points after the operation and comparisons between groups are made to follow the rate of recovery and end results.

Not Provided
Interventional
Phase 3
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Humeral Fracture
  • Procedure: Immediate mobilisation after locking-plate osteosynthesis

    Immediate passive range of motion exercises are begun postoperatively, after 3 weeks, active unloaded mobilisation begins after three weeks and active, loaded use is allowed 6 weeks postoperatively.

    Surgical procedure is open reduction of the fracture and internal fixation of the fracture using a locking plate using standard deltopectoral approach and AO principles in fracture management.

  • Procedure: Standard mobilisation after locking plate osteosynthesis

    Immediately postoperatively the arm is held in a sling, active mobilisation of healthy joints and pendel exercises are befun. Passive range of motion exercises of the shoulder are begun 3 weeks postoperatively. Active mobilisation begins after six weeks.

    Surgical procedure is open reduction of the fracture and internal fixation of the fracture using a locking plate using standard deltopectoral approach and AO principles in fracture management.

  • Device: Osteosynthesis with a locking plate (Philos)
    Standard open reduction and internal fixation using a deltopectoral approach. Fracture fixation is done using a locking plate (Philos, Synthes) following the AO principles of fracture management.
  • Experimental: Immediate mobilisation
    Interventions:
    • Procedure: Immediate mobilisation after locking-plate osteosynthesis
    • Device: Osteosynthesis with a locking plate (Philos)
  • Active Comparator: Standard mobilisation
    Interventions:
    • Procedure: Standard mobilisation after locking plate osteosynthesis
    • Device: Osteosynthesis with a locking plate (Philos)
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Recruiting
100
December 2015
December 2013   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Surgery can be performed within 10 days of injury
  • A dislocated (>1cm or 35 degrees) AO 11-A2, -A3, -B1 or -B2 fracture of the surgical neck of the proximal humerus with a possible fracture of the Tuberculum Majus

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Glenohumeral dislocation
  • Fracture of the Tuberculum Minus
  • Open fracture
  • Additional fractures in the shoulder region
  • Other injuries requiring surgical treatment
  • Clinically significant injury of the brachial plexus or vasculature
  • Pathological fracture associated with cancer
  • History of a fracture of the clavicle, scapula or humerus, or history of a very significant disease or trauma of the shoulder region (hemiparesis, tumour, osteomyelitis, grave arthrosis etc)
  • Rheumatoid Arthritis in the shoulder requiring active treatment
  • Reduced co-operation or incapability for independent living (dementia, mental illness, drug- or alcohol abuse etc)
  • Unwillingness to accept some of the treatment options.
Both
18 Years and older
No
Contact: Tuomas Lähdeoja, MD +35894711 tuomas.lahdeoja@hus.fi
Contact: Mika Paavola, MD, PhD +35894711
Finland
 
NCT01524965
HUS-272/13/03/02/2010
No
Tuomas Lahdeoja, Helsinki University
Helsinki University
National Institute for Health and Welfare, Finland
Principal Investigator: Tuomas Lähdeoja, MD Helsinki University Central Hospital
Study Director: Mika Paavola, MD, PhD Helsinki University Central Hospital
Study Director: Jarkko Pajarinen, MD, PhD Helsinki University Central Hospital
Study Chair: Vesa Savolainen, MD, PhD Helsinki University Central Hospital
Study Chair: Jan-Magnus Björkenheim, MD, PhD Helsinki University Central Hospital
Study Chair: Seppo Koskinen Helsinki University Central Hospital
Study Chair: Antti Malmivaara, MD, PhD National Institute for Health and Welfare, Finland
Study Chair: Reijo Dund, MD, PhD National Institute for Health and Welfare, Finland
Helsinki University
January 2012

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP