Comparing Robotics and Laparoscopy With Laparotomy/Open Surgery for Endometrial Cancer (GOC2)

This study is not yet open for participant recruitment.
Verified November 2011 by University Health Network, Toronto
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
University Health Network, Toronto
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01480999
First received: October 19, 2011
Last updated: November 24, 2011
Last verified: November 2011

October 19, 2011
November 24, 2011
December 2011
May 2014   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
  • Surgical Outcomes [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Intraoperative complications as well as perioperative (time to discharge from hospital), early postoperative (<4 weeks) and long-term morbidity (4 weeks to 6 months)
  • Quality of Life Outcomes [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Validated quality of life questionnaires to assess the time it takes a patient to return to normal activity or work, the effect of surgery on their day-to-day living, pain, body image, sexuality, social life as well as about the costs associated with their surgery.
  • Cost-effectiveness [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Compare cost-effectiveness between MIS (minimally invasive surgery) and open surgery for early stage endometrial cancer, by evaluating lengths of hospital stay, in hospital costs and out of hospital costs
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01480999 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
Evolution of MIS rates [ Time Frame: Prior to recruitment of the first patient and every 6 months for the duration of the study ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Determine the evolution of MIS rates at each centre participating in this study, including the number of surgeons offering MIS, and the number of patients offered MIS. Evaluate whether the introduction of robotic surgery increases the proportion of patients undergoing MIS. Compare the characteristics of patients undergoing robotic-assisted, laparoscopic or open surgery.
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Comparing Robotics and Laparoscopy With Laparotomy/Open Surgery for Endometrial Cancer
A Prospective Study Evaluating Surgical and Quality of Life Outcomes in Robotics and Laparoscopy Compared to Laparotomy in Early Stage Endometrial Cancer

The use of robotic surgery in the management of gynecologic cancers has increased exponentially in the United States since the implementation of technology in 2005. In Canada, access to the system is limited because of a lack of government funding. The government has been reluctant to fund this technology because robust data, on the true impact to patient care, is lacking.

This project will prospectively examine outcomes of women, with early stage endometrial cancer, treated surgically. Open surgery will be compared to minimally invasive surgery (MIS) which will include conventional laparoscopy and robotic surgery. The data collected will include detailed assessment of surgical data, peri-operative events, quality of life analysis, health economic evaluation and evaluation of MIS rates.

Not Provided
Observational
Observational Model: Cohort
Time Perspective: Prospective
Not Provided
Not Provided
Non-Probability Sample

New patients in the gynecologic oncology clinic will be offered the surgery that is deemed appropriate by their individual surgeon based on the patient's medical and surgical histories, type of malignancy, and the surgeon's expertise in open surgery, laparoscopy and/or robotic surgery.

Cancer of the Endometrium
Not Provided
  • Laparotomy (open surgery)
  • Laparoscopic surgery
  • Robotic assisted surgery
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Not yet recruiting
1000
May 2014
May 2014   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Any type of histologically confirmed early stage (stage 1 or 2) cancer of the endometrium
  • Adequate bone marrow, renal and hepatic function (Aust - WBC >3.0 x 109 cells/L, Platelets >100x109 cells/L, Creatinine <180 µmmol/L, Bilirubin <1.5 x normal, AST <3 x normal)
  • ECOG Performance status of 0-1
  • Suitable candidate for surgery
  • Signed approved informed consent
  • Female, 18 years of age or older
  • Pre-operative health is graded as ASA I-III
  • Patients able to complete baseline questions either on their own or with assistance
  • Patient willing to comply with scheduled visits

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Major abdominal surgery, chemotherapy or radiation within 3 months before the baseline visit
  • Evidence of diffuse peritoneal carcinomatosis by imaging or clinical exam
  • Unfit for surgery: concomitant disorders incompatible with the study or surgery (at the discretion of the investigator)
  • Patients who are breastfeeding or become pregnant during the study
Female
18 Years and older
No
Contact: Marcus Q Bernardini, MD MSc FRCSC 416 946 4501 ext 2668 marcus.bernardini@uhn.ca
United States,   Canada
 
NCT01480999
11-0447-CE
Yes
University Health Network, Toronto
University Health Network, Toronto
Not Provided
Principal Investigator: Marcus Q Bernardini, MD MSc FRCSC Princess Margaret Hospital - University Health Network
University Health Network, Toronto
November 2011

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP