Orbital Fractures Measurement: Intraoperative Versus Computed Tomography (CT) Scan

This study is not yet open for participant recruitment.
Verified November 2011 by HaEmek Medical Center, Israel
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
HaEmek Medical Center, Israel
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01464541
First received: October 18, 2011
Last updated: November 2, 2011
Last verified: November 2011

October 18, 2011
November 2, 2011
December 2011
November 2013   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Patients with orbital fractures that require surgical repair will have their fracture"s" size measured intraoperatively by a ruler and/or a caliper in millimeters and compare it to the size measured by the CT scan. [ Time Frame: 2 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
Patients with orbital fractures that need to be operated. Their intraoperative fracture size will be measured by the orbital surgeon by a ruler or/and a caliper in millimeters. Size on CT scan is determined by counting the number of slides that show the fracture (for anteropsterior fracture we measure the number of coronal sections that show the fracture multiply X1-each section is 1millimeter thickness, and so on for mediolateral fractures we measure saggital sections number and for superoinferior fractures the axial sections that show the fracture.
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01464541 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Orbital Fractures Measurement: Intraoperative Versus Computed Tomography (CT) Scan
Not Provided

Purpose to compare the orbital fracture size measured by orbital CT scan and compare it to the actual orbital fracture size intraoperatively in patients who needed surgical intervention to correct the fracture.

Hypothesis: there is difference between the CT measure fracture size and the actual intraoperative size.

Not Provided
Interventional
Not Provided
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Orbital Fractures
  • Procedure: operative fracture size vs CT fracture size
    comparing actual intraoperative fracture size to the CT fracture size
  • Procedure: orbital fracture intraoperative measurement
    comparing intraoperative fracture size to the CT orbital fracture size
Experimental: orbital fractures size
patients who undergo surgical repair of orbital fracture with measuring the fracture size intraoperatively and had available orbital Ct scan preoperatively.
Interventions:
  • Procedure: operative fracture size vs CT fracture size
  • Procedure: orbital fracture intraoperative measurement
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Not yet recruiting
20
Not Provided
November 2013   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • With orbital fracture (trauma) proved by CT scan and need operative repair.
  • Agree to participate.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients that refuse to be included in the study.
  • Under the age of 18 years.
  • CT not performed or not available.
  • Not qualified to sign the consent form.
Both
18 Years and older
No
Contact: Daniel Briscoe, MD 972504439421 daniel_br@clalit.org.il
Israel
 
NCT01464541
EMC-0046-11
No
HaEmek Medical Center, Israel
HaEmek Medical Center, Israel
Not Provided
Principal Investigator: Daniel Briscoe, MD Chairperson, dept. of ophthalmology, haemek medical center, afula 18101, Israel
Study Director: Wasseem Hilo, MD Resident, ophthalmology dept, Haemek Medical Center, Afula 18101, Israel
HaEmek Medical Center, Israel
November 2011

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP