Cognitive Control Training for Depression

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Boston University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01454141
First received: October 13, 2011
Last updated: October 14, 2011
Last verified: October 2011

October 13, 2011
October 14, 2011
July 2010
June 2011   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Change in Beck Depression Inventory [ Time Frame: two weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Change score in BDI was assessed between CCT and PVT groups.
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01454141 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Change in Positive and Negative Affective Scale (PANAS) [ Time Frame: two weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    We looked at the change scores in positive and negative affectivity between CCT and PVT groups.
  • Emotional Response and Recovery Task [ Time Frame: two weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    We looked at the emotional responses to IAPS images between CCT and PVT groups.
  • Changes in Visual Analog Scales [ Time Frame: two weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    We looked at the change scores in visual analog scales (happy/sad) between CCT and PVT groups.
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Cognitive Control Training for Depression
Not Provided

Depression is frequently characterized by patterns of inflexible, maladaptive, and ruminative thinking styles; these patterns themselves are thought to result from a combination of decreased attentional control, decreased executive functioning, and increased negative affect. Specifically, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex has been hypothesized to play a central role in emotion regulation by recruiting resources necessary for executive control. Recent advances have been made in neurobehavioral training strategies as interventions for emotional disorders such as depression. Cognitive control training (CCT) uses computer-based exercises to recruit and activate prefrontal neural networks via repeated behavioral exercises, with the aim of strengthening cognitive and emotional functions. A previous study found that severely depressed participants who received CCT exhibited reduced negative affect and rumination as well as improved focus and concentration. The present study aimed to extend this line of research by employing a more stringent control group and testing the efficacy of three sessions of CCT over a two-week period in a community population with depressed mood. Forty-eight participants with high BDI-II scores were randomized to CCT or a comparison condition (Peripheral Vision Training; PVT). The investigators hypothesized that relative to a control condition (PVT), CCT would be associated with less self-reported negative mood and emotional reactivity.

Not Provided
Interventional
Not Provided
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Basic Science
Depression
  • Other: Cognitive Control Training
    Three sessions of CCT.
  • Other: Peripheral Vision Task
    Three sessions of PVT.
  • Experimental: Peripheral Vision Task
    During this task participants viewed a circular array of 15 discs and were asked to move their attention, but not their eyes, clockwise around the array while auditory tones were presented. Following the presentation of a distinct target tone, the discs changed color and participants reported the color of the disc by pressing a designated button on the keyboard. This task was developed to be a non-active control condition, targeting visual and occipital areas of the brain, and therefore allows us to discriminate between the effects of completing a computer-based task from interventions that specifically target the PFC.
    Intervention: Other: Peripheral Vision Task
  • Experimental: Cognitive Control Training
    Cognitive Control Training (CCT) A modified version of the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task (PASAT) and the Attention Control Intervention were used to train participants' attentional control in accordance with procedures used by Siegle and colleagues.
    Intervention: Other: Cognitive Control Training
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
56
June 2011
June 2011   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • BU students and local community members.
  • At least 18 years of age.
  • Familiarity with a computer keyboard.
  • BDI-II score ≥ 17

Exclusion Criteria:

  • BDI-II score < 17, or > 35
Both
18 Years to 65 Years
Yes
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United States
 
NCT01454141
BU-2182E
No
Boston University
Boston University
Not Provided
Not Provided
Boston University
October 2011

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP