Safety and Efficacy of the SL PLUS and the SL PLUS MIA Hip Stem (SL-PLUS)

This study is ongoing, but not recruiting participants.
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Smith & Nephew Orthopaedics AG
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01435850
First received: September 13, 2011
Last updated: October 19, 2012
Last verified: September 2011

September 13, 2011
October 19, 2012
April 2009
October 2012   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Stability of primary total hip arthroplasty [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Study compares the stability of two types of hip stems using the Femoral Component Analysis (FCA-EBRA)method. 4 images of a-p pelvic view will be collected over a 2-year period: at 6 weeks, 6, 12 and 24 months.
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01435850 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Oxford Hip Score [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

    According to Delaunay C, Cross-cultural adaptations of the Oxford-12 HIP score to the French speaking population, Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009 Apr;95(2):89-99. Epub 2009 Apr 3.

    Oxford Hip Score will be measured pre-operatively, after 6 weeks, 6, 12 and 24 months.

  • Harris Hip Score [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Harris Hip Score will be measured pre-operatively, after 6, 12 and 24 months. No measurement after 6 weeks.
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Safety and Efficacy of the SL PLUS and the SL PLUS MIA Hip Stem
"Enfoncement de la Tige SL-PLUS et de la Tige SL-PLUS MIA:Etude Comparative"

Randomized controlled trial using two types of hip stems, SL PLUS MIA (control group) and SL PLUS (study group).

We compare primary and secondary stability of both hip stems for radiographic outcome using EBRA (Ein-Bild-Roentgen-Analyse) after a two year follow-up period.

Further, we compare all differences in clinical outcome using Harris Hip Score, Oxford hip score and radiographic findings.

This study is a monocentric study, randomized and controlled including two types of hip stems: SL PLUS MIA (control group) and SL PLUS (study group).

Each group will include 45 patients where a number of 5 patients for each group calculated extra in case of loss.

Patients will be followed after

  • 6 weeks
  • 6 months
  • 12 months
  • 24 months. Radiographs are taken in a-p and lateral view using a standard protocol. Primary and secondary stability of both hip stems will be analyzed using the EBRA software (Ein-Bild-Roentgen-Analyse, University of Innsbruck, Austria) after the completion of the two year follow-up.

Further, we compare all differences in clinical outcome using Harris Hip Score, Oxford hip score and radiographic findings such as radiolucent lines.

Interventional
Phase 4
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: Single Blind (Subject)
Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Joint Replacement
  • Hip
Procedure: primary total hip arthroplasty
All patients eligible to the study criteria will be included. A total hip arthroplasty unilateral will be performed.
Other Name: SL-PLUS, SL-PLUS MIA, Lateralized hip stem
  • Sham Comparator: HIP STEM SL PLUS
    study group
    Intervention: Procedure: primary total hip arthroplasty
  • Active Comparator: HIP STEM SL PLUS MIA
    control group
    Intervention: Procedure: primary total hip arthroplasty
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Active, not recruiting
80
September 2014
October 2012   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient needs primary total hip arthroplasty with SL-PLUS (standard or lateralized depending on bone morphology)
  • Age at surgery : 18-80 years old
  • Patient has social security number
  • Patient gives Informed Consent (IC) by signing the IC form and patient is willing to attend the follow-up control

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient's BMI is over 35
  • Patient has bone tumors that can affect implant stability
  • Patient needs cortical steroid treatment
  • Patient needs hip revision arthroplasty
  • Patient has general inflammation that could affect bone quality
  • Patients classified Charnley C
Both
18 Years to 80 Years
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
France
 
NCT01435850
D10056-2-F
Not Provided
Smith & Nephew Orthopaedics AG
Smith & Nephew Orthopaedics AG
Not Provided
Principal Investigator: Henri Migaud, MD, Pr. University Hospital
Smith & Nephew Orthopaedics AG
September 2011

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP