Preservation of Joint Function Using Postoperative Continuous Passive Motion (CPM) A Pilot Study

This study is not yet open for participant recruitment.
Verified January 2013 by Mayo Clinic
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Shawn W. O'Driscoll, Mayo Clinic
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01420887
First received: July 13, 2011
Last updated: January 15, 2013
Last verified: January 2013

July 13, 2011
January 15, 2013
September 2013
July 2014   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Recurrence of elbow contracture [ Time Frame: 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
There will be an 80% statistical power to detect a difference of 2 points in the pre-surgery to post-surgery change in VAS pain between subjects in the two study arms. Similarly, there will be an 80% power to detect a difference of 16 degrees in the pre-surgery to post-surgery change in total arc of motion between the two study groups. There will be 80% power to detect a difference of at least 9 points on the pre-surgery to post-surgery difference in the DASH score.
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01420887 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
Subsequent injury or disease of the affected elbow [ Time Frame: 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
There will be an 80% statistical power to detect a difference of 2 points in the pre-surgery to post-surgery change in VAS pain between subjects in the two study arms. Similarly, there will be an 80% power to detect a difference of 16 degrees in the pre-surgery to post-surgery change in total arc of motion between the two study groups. There will be 80% power to detect a difference of at least 9 points on the pre-surgery to post-surgery difference in the DASH score.
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Preservation of Joint Function Using Postoperative Continuous Passive Motion (CPM) A Pilot Study
Preservation of Joint Function Using Postoperative Continuous Passive Motion (CPM) A Pilot Study

This pilot study is designed to determine if the rehabilitative benefits of continuous passive motion (CPM) will help preserve/restore the joint function and significantly improve the rate of recovery of patients after the surgical release of elbow contractures better than standard physiotherapy and static splinting.

Elbow stiffness and reduced motion commonly occur after elbow injury or surgery. With traumatic injuries to the elbow, contractures are a common complication. Indeed, they are expected in most cases. For patients with these injuries who are otherwise healthy, active and require the restoration of full function in order to return to their previous level of activity/work, this reduced motion can be especially problematic and even debilitating. In our hands the investigators have found and published that most patients treated with postoperative Continuous Passive Motion following surgical repair of their stiffness have been able to recover all or nearly all of their prior elbow mobility and function. Though CPM has been in clinical use for decades, a prospective randomized clinical trial has never been published proving its effectiveness. The investigators believe and intend to show in this study that the rehabilitative benefits of continuous passive motion (CPM) will help preserve/restore the joint function and significantly improve the rate of recovery of patients after stiffness is surgically repaired. Specific Aim 1: To demonstrate that postoperative use of CPM enhances tissue healing and hastens recovery following surgical release of elbow contracture. Specific Aim 2: To demonstrate that postoperative use of CPM improves ultimate function following surgical release of elbow contracture. Specific Aim 3: To demonstrate that CPM is a cost-efficient treatment following surgical release of elbow contracture. Study Design: 50 Patients will be organized according to whether they need open or arthroscopic contracture release, then randomly assigned to one of two postoperative treatment groups: Experimental - CPM and Control - Physical Therapy. The subjects of this study will be followed for 12 months postoperatively. Throughout this 12 month period the impact/effectiveness of CPM versus Physical Therapy will be evaluated by assessing functional status, pain, mobility, general health related quality of life, utility, and societal cost-effectiveness. In line with the mission of the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, this study will help anyone with elbow injuries that result in stiffness and loss of motion. Such a study has the advantage of being highly translational with the potential to have an immediate impact on patient treatment and care. The findings from this study will be able to help patients immediately and ensure that the principals of Evidence Based Medicine are applied to patients with these types of elbow injuries and that they receive the treatment they need for the best possible recovery based on hard evidence and scientific facts.

Interventional
Phase 3
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Elbow Injury
  • Procedure: Continuous Passive Motion
    Continuous passive motion.
  • Procedure: Physical Therapy
    Physical therapy.
  • Experimental: Continuous Passive Motion
    Subjects randomized to CPM therapy.
    Intervention: Procedure: Continuous Passive Motion
  • Active Comparator: Physical Therapy
    Subjects randomized to physical therapy.
    Intervention: Procedure: Physical Therapy
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Not yet recruiting
50
July 2015
July 2014   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

To be included, each patient must meet ALL of the following:

  1. Lack of elbow flexion and/or extension, with or without pain.
  2. The contracture must have been present for at least six months and failed to respond to non-surgical treatment.
  3. Surgery to be performed will be an open or arthroscopic capsulectomy or osteocapsular arthroplasty with removal of heterotopic ossification as necessary (participants will be stratified according to open or arthroscopic surgery).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Contraindication to use of CPM or regional brachial plexus block, such as bleeding diathesis, use of anticoagulants or severe restriction in shoulder range of movement.
  2. Preoperative neuropathy or neuritis, except for isolated intermittent ulnar neuritis.
  3. Neuromuscular disorder, including spasticity that might limit ability to completely participate in rehabilitation.
  4. Psychiatric disorder, including spasticity that might limit ability to cooperate with rehabilitation.
  5. Progressive inflammatory disease such as rheumatoid arthritis.
Both
13 Years and older
No
Contact: Tyson L. Scrabeck 507-538-1016 scrabeck.tyson@mayo.edu
United States
 
NCT01420887
11-000601
No
Shawn W. O'Driscoll, Mayo Clinic
Mayo Clinic
Not Provided
Principal Investigator: Shawn O Driscoll, MD, PhD Mayo Clinic
Mayo Clinic
January 2013

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP