Ultrasound Guided Ankle Block Versus Medial Forefoot Block for Forefoot Surgery (USGAB)

This study is currently recruiting participants.
Verified September 2011 by Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Dr. Andrew J Coe, Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01386320
First received: June 29, 2011
Last updated: September 30, 2011
Last verified: September 2011

June 29, 2011
September 30, 2011
February 2011
October 2014   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Time taken to carry out each local anaesthetic block [ Time Frame: Over forty five minutes from the start of the study. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Time taken between opening sterile packs and completion of local anaesthetic block is measured by a blind observer.
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01386320 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Onset of local anaesthesia [ Time Frame: Over thirty minutes from completion of the local anaesthetic block. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Following administration of the local block, development of anaesthesia will be measured looking at cold and pin-prick sensation by a blind observer.
  • Duration of pain relief following local anaesthetic block. [ Time Frame: Over 24 hours following surgery. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Pain relief will be assessed over 24 hours following surgery, to assess its duration and quality, by a blind observer.
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Ultrasound Guided Ankle Block Versus Medial Forefoot Block for Forefoot Surgery
A Randomised, Blinded Comparison of an Ultrasound Guided Ankle Block Compared to a Nerve Stimulator Guided Ankle Block for Pain Relief After Forefoot Surgery.

Forefoot surgery includes bunion surgery and similar reconstructive bone cutting surgery and is very painful. Local anaesthetic nerve blocks have been used for many years to help alleviate pain following this surgery. The present study aims to compare a new ultrasound guided nerve block to a well established nerve stimulator guided technique. Comparisons will include time taken to carry out the block, speed of onset of numbness and duration and quality of pain relief after surgery.

Not Provided
Interventional
Not Provided
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Pain Relief After Forefoot Surgery
  • Procedure: Ultrasound guided ankle block
    Under ultrasound guidance, block of the tibial nerve, superficial and deep branches of the common peroneal nerve and saphenous nerves will be carried out using 12 mls 0.5% levobupivacaine and 12 mls 0.75% levobupivacaine.
  • Procedure: Medial forefoot block
    Using peripheral nerve stimulator guidance, the tibial and common peroneal nerves will be blocked ( plus the saphenous nerve ), using a total of 12 mls 0.75% levobupivacaine and 12 mls 0.5% levobupivacaine.
  • Active Comparator: Ultrasound guided ankle block
    Subjects in this arm will be given an ultrasound guided ankle block prior to foot surgery.
    Intervention: Procedure: Ultrasound guided ankle block
  • Active Comparator: Medial forefoot block
    Subjects in this arm will be given a nerve-stimulator guided forefoot block prior to anaesthesia and forefoot surgery
    Intervention: Procedure: Medial forefoot block
Chin KJ, Chan V. Ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blockade. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2008 Oct;21(5):624-31. Review.

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Recruiting
60
October 2014
October 2014   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Fit adult patients requiring forefoot surgery with bone cutting.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Morbid obesity (BMI >40), known contraindications to regional anaesthesia
Both
18 Years to 85 Years
No
Not Provided
United Kingdom
 
NCT01386320
R0929 10/1304/1
No
Dr. Andrew J Coe, Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust
Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust
Not Provided
Principal Investigator: Andrew J Coe, FRCA Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust
Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust
September 2011

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP