Text Size

An Algorithm for Intra-operative Goal-directed Haemodynamic Management in Non-cardiac Surgery (ERAS_feasi)

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Claudia Spies, Charite University, Berlin, Germany
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01384097
First received: June 27, 2011
Last updated: September 7, 2011
Last verified: September 2011
History of Changes

June 27, 2011
September 7, 2011
September 2007
February 2011   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
hospital length of stay [ Time Frame: a period of 60 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
The perioperative hospital length of stay is assessed.
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01384097 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • need for ventilator therapy [ Time Frame: a period of 60 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    The perioperative need for ventilator therapy is assessed.
  • monetary reimbursement for prolonged hospital stay [ Time Frame: a period of 60 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    The monetary reimbursement for prolonged hospital stay is assessed to evaluate the impact on financial consequences.
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
An Algorithm for Intra-operative Goal-directed Haemodynamic Management in Non-cardiac Surgery
An Algorithm for Intra-operative Goal-directed Haemodynamic Management in Non-cardiac Surgery - a Feasibility Study

A systematic literature search a goal-directed haemodynamic algorithm was created. The hypothesis of this study was that the goal-directed haemodynamic algorithm is feasible and can improve clinical outcome.

After a systematic literature search a goal-directed haemodynamic algorithm was created. The algorithm was adapted to international standards and consensus was reached through a modified Delphi method at international meetings. The feasibility of using the algorithm for intraoperative haemodynamic management was tested and the resultant clinical data analyzed retrospectively for several types of surgery with the hypothesis that the goal-directed haemodynamic algorithm is feasible in the clinical setting and can improve clinical outcome.
Observational
Observational Model: Cohort
Time Perspective: Retrospective
Not Provided
Not Provided
Probability Sample

Patients undergoing a surgical repair of hip fractures, open right hemicolectomy and extended hemicolectomy, radical tumor debulking in primary ovarian cancer or a pylorus-preserving pancreatic head resection.
  • Fracture of Surgical Neck of Humerus
  • Colonic Tumor
  • Stage IIIB Ovarian Carcinoma
  • Neoplasm of Head of Pancreas
Not Provided
  • Conventional care
    patients treated by conventional haemodynamic care intraoperatively
  • Haemodynamic algorithm
    patients treated within a goal-directed haemodynamic algorithm intraoperatively
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
774
June 2011
February 2011   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing a surgical repair of hip fractures, open right hemicolectomy and extended hemicolectomy, radical tumor debulking in primary ovarian cancer or a pylorus-preserving pancreatic head resection at the Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Campus Virchow Clinic
  • 18 years and older

Exclusion Criteria:

  • emergency procedures
Both
18 Years and older
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Germany
 
NCT01384097
ERAS_feasibility
No
Claudia Spies, Charite University, Berlin, Germany
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
Not Provided
Principal Investigator: Claudia Spies, MD Prof. Charite University, Berlin, Germany
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
September 2011

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP