Efficacy on Pain Following a Procedure for Injecting Sclerotherapeutic Foam Into the Great Saphenous Vein
| Tracking Information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Received Date ICMJE | April 13, 2011 | ||||
| Last Updated Date | September 13, 2011 | ||||
| Start Date ICMJE | November 2010 | ||||
| Primary Completion Date | May 2011 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
pain following a procedure for injecting sclerotherapeutic foam into the Great Saphenous vein under echography control [ Time Frame: 25 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] Pain evaluated from D1 to D21 by the patient at the end of the day using a vertical visual analog scale (VAS) on 10 cm not fixed, in the patient's book: "Indicate the maximum intensity of your pain along the route of the treated vein since this morning and before taking any analgesic. Draw a horizontal line on the vertical line below |
||||
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
| Change History | Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01368159 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site | ||||
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Descriptive Information | |||||
| Brief Title ICMJE | Efficacy on Pain Following a Procedure for Injecting Sclerotherapeutic Foam Into the Great Saphenous Vein | ||||
| Official Title ICMJE | Randomised, Comparative Trial in Parallel Groups and Blinded, to Compare Efficacy on Pain Following a Procedure for Injecting Sclerotherapeutic Foam Into the G.S V. Under Echography Control, Between Three Types of Medical Compression Hose | ||||
| Brief Summary | The trial objectives are to compare efficacy relative to pain, along the route of the vein following echoguided endovenous injection of sclerotherapeutic foam into the Great Saphenous vein, of class III microfibre compression (centred at 25 mm Hg) versus class I (10-15 mm Hg) versus class III cotton compression (20 to 36 mm Hg) over 21 days. The main contrast will be the comparison between the first two groups mentioned. All other contrasts will be secondary. The "Class I compression" versus "The two class III compressions" contrast will also be studied. Efficacy will be measured by totalling the VAS scores for maximum pain experienced since the morning and evaluated by the patient at the end of the day. Consumption of analgesics or the number of days of analgesic treatment necessary for the 3 compression types used will be compared. One of the trial objectives is also to show that regular use of a class III compression product leads to a reduction in complications following sclerosis (by reducing the number of non-serious/serious complications specific to sclerosis: matting, pigmentation, inflammation, development of sclerosis requiring drainage, DVT, pulmonary embolism, etc.). The trial also aims to compare the rate of successful sclerosis between the three devices, success being defined by complete or partial occlusion of the great saphenous vein, leading to the disappearance of reflux at the crural level. The other secondary objectives will be patient evaluation of comfort, ease of putting on and taking off the compression hose and a global appreciation of the procedure for echoguided endovenous injection of sclerotherapeutic foam into the great saphenous vein, followed by wearing compression hose. |
||||
| Detailed Description | Not desired |
||||
| Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||
| Study Phase | Phase 4 | ||||
| Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
||||
| Condition ICMJE | Venous Disease | ||||
| Intervention ICMJE | Device: Compression Stockings
The trial objectives are to compare efficacy relative to pain, along the route of the vein following echoguided endovenous injection of sclerotherapeutic foam into the Great Saphenous vein, of class III microfibre compression (centred at 25 mm Hg) versus class I (10-15 mm Hg) versus class III cotton compression (20 to 36 mm Hg) over 21 days. The main contrast will be the comparison between the first two groups mentioned. All other contrasts will be secondary. The "Class I compression" versus "The two class III compressions" contrast will also be studied.
Other Names:
|
||||
| Study Arm (s) |
|
||||
| Publications * | Not Provided | ||||
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||
| Recruitment Information | |||||
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Completed | ||||
| Enrollment ICMJE | 120 | ||||
| Completion Date | May 2011 | ||||
| Primary Completion Date | May 2011 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria: General:
Linked to the pathology:
Exclusion Criteria:
Linked to the pathology/product:
|
||||
| Gender | Female | ||||
| Ages | 18 Years and older | ||||
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No | ||||
| Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||||
| Location Countries ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Administrative Information | |||||
| NCT Number ICMJE | NCT01368159 | ||||
| Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | Classmousse1 | ||||
| Has Data Monitoring Committee | No | ||||
| Responsible Party | Le Club Mousse | ||||
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | Le Club Mousse | ||||
| Collaborators ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||
| Information Provided By | Le Club Mousse | ||||
| Verification Date | September 2011 | ||||
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|||||