Stenting in the Treatment of Aneurysm Trial (STAT)

This study is currently recruiting participants.
Verified February 2013 by Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
Sponsor:
Collaborator:
Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01340612
First received: April 20, 2011
Last updated: February 26, 2013
Last verified: February 2013

April 20, 2011
February 26, 2013
April 2011
April 2015   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Recurrence rate of target aneurysm [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01340612 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Rate of Procedural complications defined as number of subjects with reported peri-procedural Adverse Events [ Time Frame: 30 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
    Periprocedural Adverse Events is any type of complication or Adverse Event reported during or in the 30 days following the intervention
  • Rate of mortality and morbidity defined as the number of subjects with a disabling neurological events as measured by a modified Rankin Score greater than 2 during the follow-up period [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
    A morbid event is defined as any Adverse Event of any severity being possibly or probably related to the disease or the treatment
  • Overall morbidity and mortality defined as a change in modified Rankin Score relative to baseline [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • Incidence of in-stent stenosis defined as the number of subjects with a reduction in the luminal diameter of greater than 50% [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
    luminal diameter will be evaluated by an independant Core Lab
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Stenting in the Treatment of Aneurysm Trial
Stenting in the Treatment of Large, Wide-necked or Recurring Intracranial Aneurysms

The STAT trial aims at comparing coiling versus coiling plus stenting in patients with aneurysms prone to recurrence, that is large aneurysms or recurring aneurysms after previous coiling or wide-necked aneurysms. The primary hypothesis is that the use of stenting in addition to coiling decreases the recurrence rate from 33% to 20% at 12 months as compared to coiling alone.

Not Provided
Interventional
Phase 4
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Intracranial Aneurysm
  • Device: endovascular coiling with any type of currently approved coil (first or second generation)
    Standard procedure for endovascular coiling.Coils may be bare Platinum coils or any so-called second genration coils such as but not restricted to Hydrocoil or Cerecyte
  • Device: endovascular stenting with or without coiling. The stent may be any of the currently approved stents for intracranial aneurysms.
    Standard procedure for stenting. Addition of coils to the stent is left to the judgment of the treating physician
  • Active Comparator: coiling
    Intervention: Device: endovascular coiling with any type of currently approved coil (first or second generation)
  • Active Comparator: coiling plus stenting
    Interventions:
    • Device: endovascular coiling with any type of currently approved coil (first or second generation)
    • Device: endovascular stenting with or without coiling. The stent may be any of the currently approved stents for intracranial aneurysms.
Darsaut TE, Raymond J; STAT Collaborative Group. The design of the STenting in Aneurysm Treatments (STAT) trial. J Neurointerv Surg. 2012 May 1;4(3):178-81. Epub 2011 Jun 23.

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Recruiting
600
April 2016
April 2015   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients presenting at least one aneurysm candidate for coiling, with large (≥10mm), wide-necked (>4mm), or recurrent lesions after coiling (but not stenting) and judged by the neurovascular team to require elective treatment provided that this single lesion, and no other aneurysm, will be treated during the endovascular session to be the object of the trial
  • The anatomy of the lesion is such that endovascular treatment is judged possible with or without stenting
  • The endovascular physician is a priori content to use either type of technique
  • The patient has not previously been randomized into the trial
  • Treatment is elective
  • Patient is 18 or older
  • Life expectancy is more than 2 years
  • Patient has given fully informed consent and has signed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other aneurysms requiring treatment during the same session
  • Patients with associated cerebral arteriovenous malformations
  • Patients with recently ruptured aneurysms
  • When parent vessel occlusion is the primary intent of the procedure
  • Any absolute contraindication to endovascular treatment, angiography, or anesthesia such as severe allergies to contrast or medications, including ASA and Clopidogrel
  • Patients with recurring, previously stented aneurysms
Both
18 Years and older
No
Contact: Ruby Klink, PhD 1-514-890-8000 ext 25245 ruby.klink@crchum.qc.ca
Canada
 
NCT01340612
CE10.111
Yes
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal
Principal Investigator: Jean Raymond, MD Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal - Hôpital Notre Dame
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
February 2013

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP