Hypothermia and Circulatory Arrest During Surgery on the Ascending Aorta: A Comparison Between Two Cooling Methods
| Tracking Information | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Received Date ICMJE | January 7, 2011 | ||||||||
| Last Updated Date | March 20, 2012 | ||||||||
| Start Date ICMJE | March 2011 | ||||||||
| Estimated Primary Completion Date | September 2012 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||||
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Duration of cooling [ Time Frame: intraoperatively ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] | ||||||||
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||||
| Change History | Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01306734 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site | ||||||||
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||||||
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||||
| Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||||
| Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||||
| Descriptive Information | |||||||||
| Brief Title ICMJE | Hypothermia and Circulatory Arrest During Surgery on the Ascending Aorta: A Comparison Between Two Cooling Methods | ||||||||
| Official Title ICMJE | Hypothermia and Circulatory Arrest During Surgery on the Ascending Aorta: A Comparison Between Two Cooling Methods | ||||||||
| Brief Summary | PURPOSE: To compare crash cooling versus gradient cooling methods for patients undergoing planned surgery on the ascending aorta in deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. To investigate the impact of hypothermia and circulatory arrest on the coagulation, stress-response, and cerebral outcome. BACKGROUND: Cooling to 18 °C using extracorporeal circulation allows for circulatory arrest during surgery on the ascending aorta. Two different methods are used either lowering the temperature of the blood by 10 °C at a time, gradient cooling, or as cold as possible, crash cooling. The distribution of hypothermia is expected to be different for the two methods, the latter predominantly cooling the body core. The influence on the physiological response is expected to vary with the two methods. The surgical procedure and the cooling greatly elicit a stress response and the coagulation is profoundly influenced. There can be adverse effects on the neurological outcome due to the procedure. The two methods are considered equal, but have never been subjected to comparison. The surgery and circulatory changes can have a negative influence on the cerebral outcome . METHODS: Twenty patients between 18 and 80 yrs randomized either to crash cooling or gradient cooling, ten patients in each group.. Patients with severe comorbidities or known coagulopathy are excluded. Anesthesia and operation as performed routinely in the department. The primary endpoint is duration of cooling, secondary endpoints include coagulation parameters (thromboelastography, clot stability), stress response parameters (adhesion molecule expression on endothelial cells, oxidative stress analysis, inflammatory markers), neuropsychological tests, MRI of the cerebrum, markers of cerebral ischemia, and ultrasound imaging of the great vessels for detection of air bubbles. Baseline values are obtained for all parameters. |
||||||||
| Detailed Description | Not Provided | ||||||||
| Study Type ICMJE | Observational | ||||||||
| Study Design ICMJE | Observational Model: Cohort Time Perspective: Prospective |
||||||||
| Target Follow-Up Duration | Not Provided | ||||||||
| Biospecimen | Retention: Samples With DNA Description: Bloodsamples serum plasma |
||||||||
| Sampling Method | Probability Sample | ||||||||
| Study Population | Tertiary care clinic. Patients eligible for planned ascending aorta aneurism repair under deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. |
||||||||
| Condition ICMJE | Ascending Aorta Aneurism | ||||||||
| Intervention ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||||
| Study Group/Cohort (s) |
|
||||||||
| Publications * | Not Provided | ||||||||
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||||||
| Recruitment Information | |||||||||
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Recruiting | ||||||||
| Estimated Enrollment ICMJE | 20 | ||||||||
| Estimated Completion Date | December 2012 | ||||||||
| Estimated Primary Completion Date | September 2012 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||||
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||||||
| Gender | Both | ||||||||
| Ages | 18 Years to 80 Years | ||||||||
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No | ||||||||
| Contacts ICMJE |
|
||||||||
| Location Countries ICMJE | Denmark | ||||||||
| Administrative Information | |||||||||
| NCT Number ICMJE | NCT01306734 | ||||||||
| Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | HYPO-SKS-2011 | ||||||||
| Has Data Monitoring Committee | No | ||||||||
| Responsible Party | University of Aarhus | ||||||||
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | University of Aarhus | ||||||||
| Collaborators ICMJE | Aarhus University Hospital | ||||||||
| Investigators ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||||
| Information Provided By | University of Aarhus | ||||||||
| Verification Date | March 2012 | ||||||||
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|||||||||