Hypothermia and Circulatory Arrest During Surgery on the Ascending Aorta: A Comparison Between Two Cooling Methods

This study is currently recruiting participants.
Verified March 2012 by University of Aarhus
Sponsor:
Collaborator:
Aarhus University Hospital
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
University of Aarhus
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01306734
First received: January 7, 2011
Last updated: March 20, 2012
Last verified: March 2012

January 7, 2011
March 20, 2012
March 2011
September 2012   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Duration of cooling [ Time Frame: intraoperatively ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01306734 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • MRI of cerebrum [ Time Frame: Baseline prior to surgery and 4 to 5 days postoperatively ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Standard perfusion-weighed Magnetic Resonance imaging of the cerebrum. The same investigator describes all images. No use of contrast agents.
  • Markers of neurological injury [ Time Frame: baseline, postoperative ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    s-100b, Neuron specific enolase
  • neurological exam [ Time Frame: baseline, postoperative, after 4 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • cognitive test [ Time Frame: baseline, postoperative, after 4 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • markers of elevated inflammatory response [ Time Frame: perioperatively ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Markers of oxidative stress [ Time Frame: perioperatively ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Coagulation parameters [ Time Frame: perioperatively ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Hypothermia and Circulatory Arrest During Surgery on the Ascending Aorta: A Comparison Between Two Cooling Methods
Hypothermia and Circulatory Arrest During Surgery on the Ascending Aorta: A Comparison Between Two Cooling Methods

PURPOSE: To compare crash cooling versus gradient cooling methods for patients undergoing planned surgery on the ascending aorta in deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. To investigate the impact of hypothermia and circulatory arrest on the coagulation, stress-response, and cerebral outcome.

BACKGROUND: Cooling to 18 °C using extracorporeal circulation allows for circulatory arrest during surgery on the ascending aorta. Two different methods are used either lowering the temperature of the blood by 10 °C at a time, gradient cooling, or as cold as possible, crash cooling. The distribution of hypothermia is expected to be different for the two methods, the latter predominantly cooling the body core. The influence on the physiological response is expected to vary with the two methods. The surgical procedure and the cooling greatly elicit a stress response and the coagulation is profoundly influenced. There can be adverse effects on the neurological outcome due to the procedure. The two methods are considered equal, but have never been subjected to comparison. The surgery and circulatory changes can have a negative influence on the cerebral outcome
.

METHODS: Twenty patients between 18 and 80 yrs randomized either to crash cooling or gradient cooling, ten patients in each group.. Patients with severe comorbidities or known coagulopathy are excluded. Anesthesia and operation as performed routinely in the department. The primary endpoint is duration of cooling, secondary endpoints include coagulation parameters (thromboelastography, clot stability), stress response parameters (adhesion molecule expression on endothelial cells, oxidative stress analysis, inflammatory markers), neuropsychological tests, MRI of the cerebrum, markers of cerebral ischemia, and ultrasound imaging of the great vessels for detection of air bubbles. Baseline values are obtained for all parameters.

Not Provided
Observational
Observational Model: Cohort
Time Perspective: Prospective
Not Provided
Retention:   Samples With DNA
Description:

Bloodsamples serum plasma

Probability Sample

Tertiary care clinic. Patients eligible for planned ascending aorta aneurism repair under deep hypothermic circulatory arrest.

Ascending Aorta Aneurism
Not Provided
  • Gradient cooling group
    Study group receiving gradient cooling during the procedure using extracorporeal circulation (ECC). The procedure is used routinely in the department and is not an experimental procedure. A maximum of 10 degrees celsius is allowed between the measured nasopharyngeal body temperature and the heater-cooler unit of the ECC-machine, when cooling or rewarming.
  • Crash cooling group
    Study group receiving rapid cooling using extracorporeal circulation. The protocol for rapid cooling is using routinely in the department and is not an experimental procedure. When cooling, the investigators aim for maximal difference in temperature between the heater-cooler unit of the ECC-machine.
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Recruiting
20
December 2012
September 2012   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients scheduled for surgery on the ascending aorta
  • Need for deep hypothermic circulatory arrest during the procedure

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known coagulopathy
  • Ejection fraction less than 30 %
  • Severe psychiatric or neurological disease
  • Severe liver disease
  • Severely reduced lung function
  • Glomerular filtration rate less than 15 ml/min/1.73 m2
Both
18 Years to 80 Years
No
Contact: Hans Kirkegaard, MD, Ph.D. +4589498852 hans.kirkegaard@dadlnet.dk
Contact: Kristian K Andersen, MD +4521680494 kristian.kjaer.andersen@ki.au.dk
Denmark
 
NCT01306734
HYPO-SKS-2011
No
University of Aarhus
University of Aarhus
Aarhus University Hospital
Not Provided
University of Aarhus
March 2012

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP