Clinical Variations and Pain Assessment in Newborns Submitted to Intratracheal Aspiration With Open and Closed System
| Tracking Information | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Received Date ICMJE | January 11, 2011 | ||||||||||||
| Last Updated Date | January 12, 2011 | ||||||||||||
| Start Date ICMJE | January 2010 | ||||||||||||
| Primary Completion Date | July 2010 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||||||||
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Pain response to tracheal suction [ Time Frame: 48 hours ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ] There were no statistically significant influences regarding the use of open (OS) or close system (CS) to intratracheal suction in this dependent variable. With OS the average score was 7,9±4,4 and 6,5±3,8 with CS, demonstrating presence of mild to moderate pain. |
||||||||||||
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||||||||
| Change History | Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01276873 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site | ||||||||||||
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||||||||
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||||||||
| Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||||||||
| Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||||||||
| Descriptive Information | |||||||||||||
| Brief Title ICMJE | Clinical Variations and Pain Assessment in Newborns Submitted to Intratracheal Aspiration With Open and Closed System | ||||||||||||
| Official Title ICMJE | Clinical Variations and Pain Assessment in Newborns Submitted to Intratracheal Aspiration With Open and Closed System. | ||||||||||||
| Brief Summary | To compare clinical effects identified in infants undergoing intratracheal aspiration with open and closed systems and verify the presence and intensity of pain in newborns during intratracheal suction, according to the system applied.Clinical, randomized, controlled, and crossover study, performed at two neonatal intensive care units after approval by the ethics committee. The sample consisted of infants from zero to seven days of age, 26 weeks of gestational age, and the exclusion criteria were use of mechanical ventilation with high-frequency oscillatory, in use of inhaled nitric oxide, in the acute phase of circulatory failure, central nervous system disorders, without reactivity to stimulus, severe asphyxia, Apgar score less than three in the fifth minute, as well as, presence of chromosomal abnormalities and congenital malformations. After obtaining the informed consent from the responsible, children were randomly allocated into the experimental (CS) and control (OS) groups. The dependent variables of this study respiratory rate (RR), peripheral oxygen saturation (SatpO2), heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP) and pain, as well as, of the complementary variables, were collected through observation, the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) scale application and medical records consultation. During the data collection the period of variables observation were: T1 (immediately before suctioning), T2 (during suctioning), T3 (immediately after) and T4 (10 minutes after). To the statistical analysis were applied Fisher exact test, McNemar, Binomial, Student t test, Wilcoxon and Mann Whitney, settling at 0.05 level of significance. |
||||||||||||
| Detailed Description | Background: Patients who underwent tracheal intubation require intratracheal tube secretions sucking, and open system (OS) or closed system (CS) can be used, in order to preserve the tracheal tube permeability and an adequate ventilation and blood oxygenation. Respiratory and hemodynamic complications, as well as, presence of pain can be possibly experienced in newborns submitted to such procedure. Objectives: To compare clinical effects identified in infants undergoing intratracheal aspiration with OS or CS and verify the presence and intensity of pain in newborns during intratracheal suction, according to the system applied. Methods: Clinical, randomized, controlled, and crossover study, performed at two neonatal intensive care units after approval by the ethics committee. The sample consisted of infants from zero to seven days of age, 26 weeks of gestational age, and the exclusion criteria were use of mechanical ventilation with high-frequency oscillatory, in use of inhaled nitric oxide, in the acute phase of circulatory failure, central nervous system disorders, without reactivity to stimulus, severe asphyxia, Apgar score less than three in the fifth minute, as well as, presence of chromosomal abnormalities and congenital malformations. After obtaining the informed consent from the responsible, children were randomly allocated into the experimental (CS) and control (OS) gruops. The dependent variables of this study respiratory rate (RR), peripheral oxygen saturation (SatpO2), heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP) and pain, as well as, of the complementary variables, were collected through observation, the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) scale application and medical records consultation. During the data collection the period of variables observation were: T1 (immediately before suctioning), T2 (during suctioning), T3 (immediately after) and T4 (10 minutes after). To the statistical analysis were applied Fisher exact test, McNemar, Binomial, Student t test, Wilcoxon and Mann Whitney, settling at 0.05 level of significance. Results: The studied groups did not show significant differences concerning the complementary variables. There were no statistically significant influences regarding the use of OS and CS of intratracheal suction in any of the dependent variables studied. Clinical consequences were observed with the use of both systems. It was demonstrated that immediately after intratracheal aspiration, the newborns had higher RR average in OS (58,4±9,6) group when compared to CS (56,2±5,9). Average values of SatpO2 were lower in OS (90,5±4,8) group compared to CS (91,6±4,6). Bradycardia was not verified in any group, however, there was a trend toward higher mean values of HR immediately after intratracheal aspiration, especially with OS (149,5±17,4) compared with the values identified before the procedure (143,2±18,1). There was low variation in the mean BP value in the two groups during the period of assessment, using both techniques. Regarding pain it was found that, with OS the average score was 7,9±4,4 and 6,5±3,8 with CS, demonstrating presence of mild to moderate pain. During the use of OS intratracheal aspiration higher pain scores (p=0,038) where verified in newborn females compared to males, this result was not observed when using CS. Conclusion: There was no statistically significant difference regarding the clinical implications, the presence and intensity of pain observed in ventilated newborns, according to the use of OS or CS to intratracheal aspiration. |
||||||||||||
| Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||||||||||
| Study Phase | Not Provided | ||||||||||||
| Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
||||||||||||
| Condition ICMJE | Adverse Reaction to Systemic Agents | ||||||||||||
| Intervention ICMJE | Device: Tracheal aspiration close system
use of closed system in comparision to open system to tracheal aspiration of nweborns, analyzing pain and climical variations associated.
Other Names:
|
||||||||||||
| Study Arm (s) | Experimental: Closed System
Application of Tracheal aspiration closed system, controlled by the use of Open system to tracheal aspiraiton.
Intervention: Device: Tracheal aspiration close system |
||||||||||||
| Publications * | Not Provided | ||||||||||||
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||||||||||
| Recruitment Information | |||||||||||||
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Completed | ||||||||||||
| Enrollment ICMJE | 13 | ||||||||||||
| Completion Date | July 2010 | ||||||||||||
| Primary Completion Date | July 2010 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||||||||
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||||||||||
| Gender | Both | ||||||||||||
| Ages | up to 28 Days | ||||||||||||
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No | ||||||||||||
| Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||||||||||||
| Location Countries ICMJE | Brazil | ||||||||||||
| Administrative Information | |||||||||||||
| NCT Number ICMJE | NCT01276873 | ||||||||||||
| Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | 1094/09 | ||||||||||||
| Has Data Monitoring Committee | Yes | ||||||||||||
| Responsible Party | Mavilde da Luz Gonçalves Pedreira, Associated professor | ||||||||||||
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | Federal University of São Paulo | ||||||||||||
| Collaborators ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||||||||
| Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||||||||||
| Information Provided By | Federal University of São Paulo | ||||||||||||
| Verification Date | December 2010 | ||||||||||||
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|||||||||||||