The Effect of Time-Slot Scheduling on Flu Vaccination Rates

The recruitment status of this study is unknown because the information has not been verified recently.
Verified September 2010 by University of Pennsylvania.
Recruitment status was  Not yet recruiting
Sponsor:
Collaborators:
Harvard University
Yale University
Stanford University
Information provided by:
University of Pennsylvania
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01206686
First received: September 14, 2010
Last updated: September 20, 2010
Last verified: September 2010

September 14, 2010
September 20, 2010
September 2010
November 2010   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Receipt of seasonal influenza vaccination [ Time Frame: up to 30 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01206686 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
The Effect of Time-Slot Scheduling on Flu Vaccination Rates
Effect of Time-Slot Scheduling on Flu Vaccination Rates

The goal of this project is to see if encouraging an individual to privately choose in advance a narrow time window in which to obtain a flu vaccination shot affects the likelihood that he or she will become vaccinated.

Influenza causes 36,000 U.S. deaths per year, but influenza immunization rates average just 28%. Behavioral "nudges" may increase the effectiveness of immunization reminder mailers at little or no added cost. Past psychology research has demonstrated that prompting people to form an implementation plan of the form, "When situation x arises, I will implement response y," increases attainment of desired goals because the desired behavior is linked to a concrete future moment. We study whether adding a planning prompt to a vaccination reminder mailer increases immunization rates.

Interventional
Not Provided
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single Blind (Subject)
Seasonal Influenza
  • Behavioral: Planning Prompt
    Patients were prompted to write down a planned date (and in some cases time) for receiving a flu shot.
  • Behavioral: Default Appointment
    Patients were given a suggested date and time for receiving a flu shot.
  • Behavioral: Control
    Patients were provided with basic information (present in all conditions) about when and where they could receive a flu shot, but they were given no further treatment.
  • Experimental: 1 Hour Planning Prompt
    Intervention: Behavioral: Planning Prompt
  • Experimental: 2 Hour Planning Prompt
    Intervention: Behavioral: Planning Prompt
  • Experimental: 1 Day Planning Prompt
    Intervention: Behavioral: Planning Prompt
  • Experimental: Default Planning Prompt
    Intervention: Behavioral: Default Appointment
  • Active Comparator: Control
    Intervention: Behavioral: Control
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Not yet recruiting
50000
April 2011
November 2010   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • seasonal influenza vaccine indications according to the CDC
  • employees of partner corporations executing study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • none
Both
18 Years and older
No
Contact: Katherine L Milkman, Ph.D. 215-573-9646 kmilkman@wharton.upenn.edu
United States
 
NCT01206686
810589
No
Professor Katherine L. Milkman, University of Pennsylvania
University of Pennsylvania
  • Harvard University
  • Yale University
  • Stanford University
Principal Investigator: Katherine L Milkman, Ph.D. University of Pennsylvania
University of Pennsylvania
September 2010

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP