Influence of Prior Chemotherapy on Clinical Benefit With Erlotinib in Patients With Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With or Without EGFR Gene Mutation
Recruitment status was Recruiting
| Tracking Information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Received Date ICMJE | September 16, 2010 | ||||
| Last Updated Date | March 8, 2012 | ||||
| Start Date ICMJE | January 2010 | ||||
| Estimated Primary Completion Date | July 2012 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Response rate to erlotinib with Docetaxel/cisplatin or Pemetrexed/cisplatin [ Time Frame: 2-3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] Eligible patients will be randomized to receive 1st line chemotherapy with either Docetaxel (60mg/m2)/Cisplatin (75mg/m2) or Pemetrexed (500mg/m2)/Cisplatin (75mg/m2) for 4-6 cycles. Patients will be followed up without any maintenance treatment after 4-6 cycles of chemotherapy. Once patients are found tumor relapse or in progression, all the patients will be prescribed Erlotinib 150 mg/day until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or death. Patients will be followed up every 2-3 months for their responsive rate. |
||||
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
| Change History | Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01204307 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site | ||||
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Progression-free survival and overall survival after erlotinib treatment with 1st line Docetaxel/cisplatin or Pemetrexed/cisplatin. [ Time Frame: 12-24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ] Erlotinib 150 mg daily will be given to patients who are in progression after 1st line cisplatin-base doublet chemotherapy. Treatment will continue until documented disease progression, or patient refusal to continue. The progression-free survival encompasses the time from the start date of the Erlotinib treatment to documented progression, or death from any cause. The Overall survival from each arm of treatment is calculated from the start date of the treatment to death or to the last follow-up visit. |
||||
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
| Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Descriptive Information | |||||
| Brief Title ICMJE | Influence of Prior Chemotherapy on Clinical Benefit With Erlotinib in Patients With Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With or Without EGFR Gene Mutation | ||||
| Official Title ICMJE | A Phase III Study to Investigate the Differential Influence of Prior Chemotherapy on the Efficacy of Erlotinib in Patients With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (IIIB, IV) With or Without EGFR Gene Mutation | ||||
| Brief Summary | To compare the differential influence of 1st line doublet chemotherapy containing Docetaxel versus Pemetrexed on clinical efficacy of Erlotinib as a second line therapy in patients with relapsed or progressed non-squamous NSCLC. |
||||
| Detailed Description | The clinical management of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains challenging. Initial therapies for advanced NSCLC with platinum-based regimens have shown consistent overall response rates of 30% to 40% with progression-free intervals of 4-5 months and 1-year survival rates of 35% to 40% [1-3]. First line doublet chemotherapy commonly used in daily practice includes Gemcitabine, vinorelbine, paclitaxel and docetaxel those have proven efficacy with platinum against best supportive care, prolonging survival for approximately 3 months. Recently, pemetrexed, a multi-target antifolate agent, has been introduced into the 1st line doublet chemotherapy with platinum-based regimen to have similar efficacy and a better safety profile compared to docetaxel or gemcitabine [4]. Although those agents seem to have equivalent efficacy, tolerability tends to be a concern for docetoxel. Myelosuppression with the standard docetaxel schedule of 75 mg/m2 administered once every 3 weeks is extremely frequent and severe; neutropenia occurs in 54% to 67% of patients and febrile neutropenia occurs in 1.8% to 8.0% of patients [5, 6]. Moreover, non-hematologic toxicities, such as grade 3-4 asthenia (12% to 18%), and nausea and vomiting (1% to 3.6%), are not uncommon [5, 6]. To increase tolerability of docetaxel, alternative schedules have been extensively studied. Accumulating evidence suggests that a weekly schedule of docetaxel (35 mg/m2) reduces severe and febrile neutropenia without decreasing antitumor activity [7-10]. Nevertheless, no significant differences were observed for anemia, thrombocytopenia, and non-hematologic toxicity [7]. For the same reason, a lower dose of docetaxel (60 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) has been recommended in Japan [11, 12]. However, recent large scale trials with such a dose of docetaxel still revealed high incidences of grade 3 and 4 neutropenia (up to 82.9%) [12-14]. Different schedules of low dose docetaxel have not been studied, nor has a comparison been made between low dose docetaxel and the less toxic agent, pemetrexed. Currently, the investigators have been following a schedule of weekly low dose docetaxel (30 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks; 60 mg/m2 accumulated dose for each cycle) at our hospital in an effort to achieve better tolerability (in press-chemotherapy 2010). The investigators therefore perform an exploratory study, by prospective analysis, to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of such a low dose docetaxel schedule compared to that of pemetrexed in patients with NSCLC who are chemotherapy naive. Erlotinib, an orally-available epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI), significantly prolongs survival and produces significant symptom and quality-of-life benefits compared with best supportive care in unselected patients with relapsed non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [15, 16]. In a large, phase III, placebo-controlled study (BR.21), erlotinib produced a survival benefit across all patient sub-groups studied [15]. |
||||
| Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||
| Study Phase | Phase 3 | ||||
| Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
||||
| Condition ICMJE | Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | ||||
| Intervention ICMJE |
|
||||
| Study Arm (s) |
|
||||
| Publications * | Feng PH, Lee KY, Chang YL, Chan YF, Kuo LW, Lin TY, Chung FT, Kuo CS, Yu CT, Lin SM, Wang CH, Chou CL, Huang CD, Kuo HP. CD14(+)S100A9(+) monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells and their clinical relevance in non-small cell lung cancer. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 Nov 15;186(10):1025-36. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201204-0636OC. Epub 2012 Sep 6. | ||||
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||
| Recruitment Information | |||||
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Recruiting | ||||
| Estimated Enrollment ICMJE | 250 | ||||
| Estimated Completion Date | December 2012 | ||||
| Estimated Primary Completion Date | July 2012 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||
| Gender | Both | ||||
| Ages | 18 Years to 75 Years | ||||
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No | ||||
| Contacts ICMJE |
|
||||
| Location Countries ICMJE | Taiwan | ||||
| Administrative Information | |||||
| NCT Number ICMJE | NCT01204307 | ||||
| Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | 99-1896C | ||||
| Has Data Monitoring Committee | Yes | ||||
| Responsible Party | Chung Fu-Tsai, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital | ||||
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | Chang Gung Memorial Hospital | ||||
| Collaborators ICMJE | Taiwan Chest Disease Association | ||||
| Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||
| Information Provided By | Chang Gung Memorial Hospital | ||||
| Verification Date | September 2010 | ||||
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|||||