Role of Radiotherapy Following Oesophageal Stenting in Cancer

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by:
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01179074
First received: May 25, 2010
Last updated: August 10, 2010
Last verified: February 2010

May 25, 2010
August 10, 2010
April 2007
March 2009   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
  • Relief of dysphagia [ Time Frame: 1 week after intervention ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

    Relief of dysphagia will be assessed by stratifying the ability to swallow into the following grades.

    Grade 1: Difficulty in swallowing solid food Grade 2: Difficulty in swallowing semisolid food Grade 3: Difficulty in swallowing liquids Grade 4: Difficulty in swallowing even saliva The dysphagia scores will be assessed 1 week after intervention (stenting and radiotherapy)in the two groups

  • Relief of dysphagia [ Time Frame: 3 months following intervention ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Dysphagia grades at 3 months will be assessed in the two groups
  • Relief of dysphagia [ Time Frame: 5 months after intervention ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Dysphagia grades at 5 months will be assessed in the two groups
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01179074 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
Survival [ Time Frame: From the date of diagnosis till death ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Patients will be followed up at baseline, 1 week after oesophageal stenting, 1 week after completion of radiotherapy and 2 monthly thereafter till their death
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Role of Radiotherapy Following Oesophageal Stenting in Cancer
Palliative Stenting With or Without Radiotherapy for Inoperable Oesophageal Carcinoma: a Randomised Trial

To assess the benefits of oesophageal stenting and external beam radiotherapy over oesophageal stenting alone in patients with inoperable oesophageal cancer

A majority of patients with oesophageal cancer present with inoperable disease and require rapid and long lasting palliation of dysphagia.

STUDY AIM: To compare dysphagia relief in patients treated with oesophageal stenting and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), versus oesophageal stenting alone and to assess overall survival, treatment related complications, and quality of life in the two groups.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with inoperable oesophageal cancer with high grade dysphagia to be randomised to receive oesophageal stenting alone (Group I), versus a combination of stenting followed by EBRT (Group II). Dysphagia relief, treatment related complications, overall survival, and quality of life to be assessed in the two groups.

Interventional
Not Provided
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
Oesophageal Cancer
  • Procedure: oesophageal stenting with self expandable metal stent
    oesophageal stent placement for high grade dysphagia in inoperable oesophageal cancer
    Other Name: Ultraflex stent, Microvasive, Boston Scientific
  • Procedure: Oesophageal stent followed by external beam radiotherapy
    30 Gy in 10 fractions over 2 weeks administered in the stent followed by EBRT group
    Other Name: External beam radiotherapy
  • Active Comparator: Oesophageal stent alone
    Patients of inoperable oesophageal cancer in this arm underwent oesophageal stenting with self expandable metal stents
    Intervention: Procedure: oesophageal stenting with self expandable metal stent
  • Active Comparator: Oesophageal stent followed by EBRT
    Patients in this arm underwent oesophageal stenting with self expandable metal stents followed by external beam radiotherapy (30Gy/10#/2weeks)
    Interventions:
    • Procedure: oesophageal stenting with self expandable metal stent
    • Procedure: Oesophageal stent followed by external beam radiotherapy
Schmid EU, Alberts AS, Greeff F, Terblanche AP, Schoeman L, Burger W, Shiels RA, Friediger D, Van der Hoven A, Falkson G. The value of radiotherapy or chemotherapy after intubation for advanced esophageal carcinoma--a prospective randomized trial. Radiother Oncol. 1993 Jul;28(1):27-30.

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
84
March 2009
March 2009   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Oesophageal cancer patients with locally advanced unresectable cancer (such as invasion of tracheo-bronchial tree, aorta, pulmonary vascular structures, etc),
  • Metastatic disease, and co-morbid conditions precluding major surgical procedure (such as severe cardiopulmonary, hepatic and renal diseases) with grade 3 and 4 dysphagia, were included in the trial.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with carcinoma of the cervical oesophagus and those who had already received prior radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or any other modality of treatment were excluded
Both
Not Provided
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
India
 
NCT01179074
SEMSRT-1
No
Prof. T.K.Chattopadhyay, Department of G.I.Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi-110029
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
Not Provided
Study Director: Tushar K Chattopadhyay, MS Head, Dept. G.I Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
February 2010

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP