A New Strategy Regarding Discontinuation of Dual Antiplatelet

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Yonsei University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01145079
First received: June 14, 2010
Last updated: March 4, 2013
Last verified: March 2013

June 14, 2010
March 4, 2013
May 2009
January 2012   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Primary Outcome The composite of cardio-vascular death, MI, stent thrombosis, TVR and bleeding (minor or major) following randomly assigned DES implantation [ Time Frame: 12 months after stent implantation ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01145079 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
A New Strategy Regarding Discontinuation of Dual Antiplatelet
A New Strategy Regarding Discontinuation of Dual Antiplatelet; Real Safety and Efficacy of a 3-month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Following Zotarolimus-eluting Stents Implantation (RESET Trial)

Drug-eluting stents (DES), markedly reducing the neointimal hyperplasia after stent implantation compared with bare-metal stents (BMS), have improved angiographic and clinical outcomes in the complex lesions and patients with high risks. However, currently, the fatal events related with stent thrombosis still occur and are the major limitation of the use of DES. Especially, late or very late thrombosis after DES implantation is an uncommon but life-threatening fatal complication presented with sudden death or myocardial infarction (MI) causing heart failure. The most powerful predictor for stent thrombosis is the discontinuation of clopidogrel. In consideration of current data regarding stent thrombosis and clinical situation of discontinuation of antiplatelet, zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) [Endeavor®, Medtronic Vascular, Santa Rosa, CA] might be anticipated to be safer than other DES during the long-term follow-up owing to healthy endothelialization. Endeavor® stent was consists of zotarolimus, thin-strut, cobalt-chromium alloy stent platform (DriverTM stent; Medtronic Vascular, Santa Rosa, CA), and phosphorylcholine coating. The ENDEAVOR II study demonstrated clinically and statistically significant improvement in all of study endpoints, including a 47 percent reduction in the primary endpoint of target vessel failure (TVF). In addition, the ENDEAVOR II trial showed a 0.5 percent rate of stent thrombosis at 30 days - with no late thrombosis beyond 30 days and no late stent malapposition. Because reendothelialization after ZES implantation may occur within 3 months, 3-month dual antiplatelet therapy is recommended in many clinical trials and real world practice. Shorter maintenance of dual antiplatelet therapy might minimize the risk for stent thrombosis in cases of discontinuation of antiplatelet and prevent waste medications and bleeding complications related with dual antiplatelet therapy. However, there have been no non-inferior or superior data of ZES considering all these circumstances. Therefore, the investigators hypothesize that ZES with 3-month dual antiplatelet therapy may be safe and beneficial in patients with coronary artery disease during follow-up than other DES, in spite of higher late lumen loss. To test this hypothesis, the investigators will perform a multi-center, randomized, prospective trial aimed at demonstrating the efficacy of the ZES versus other DES in patients with coronary artery disease in real world practice.

Not Provided
Interventional
Phase 4
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Coronary Artery Disease
  • Device: Zotarolimus-eluting stent
    Zotarolimus-eluting stent
  • Device: Zotarolimus-eluting stent for ACS and DM
    Zotarolimus-eluting stent for ACS and DM
  • Device: Everolimus-eluting stent for long lesion
    Everolimus-eluting stent for long lesion
  • Device: Sirolimus-eluting stent for short lesion
    Sirolimus-eluting stent for short lesion
  • Experimental: Endeavor arm
    Intervention: Device: Zotarolimus-eluting stent
  • Active Comparator: Endeavor resolute arm
    Intervention: Device: Zotarolimus-eluting stent for ACS and DM
  • Active Comparator: Xience arm
    Intervention: Device: Everolimus-eluting stent for long lesion
  • Active Comparator: Cypher arm
    Intervention: Device: Sirolimus-eluting stent for short lesion
Kim JS, Kang TS, Mintz GS, Park BE, Shin DH, Kim BK, Ko YG, Choi D, Jang Y, Hong MK. Randomized comparison of clinical outcomes between intravascular ultrasound and angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation for long coronary artery stenoses. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Apr;6(4):369-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.11.009. Epub 2013 Mar 20.

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
982
January 2012
January 2012   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Coronary artery disease including stable angina, unstable angina, acute non-ST elevation myocardial infarction and acute ST elevation myocardial infarction
  • Age 20 years of older
  • Patients with typical chest pain or evidences of myocardial ischemia (e.g., stable, unstable angina, silent ischemia and positive functional study or reversible changes in the electrocardiogram (ECG) consistent with ischemia
  • Patients with signed informed consent
  • Lesion and stent length for ACS and DM subgroup : Length of single lesion < 24 mm and, Summation of total length of all inserted DES in 3 vessel < 60 mm
  • Lesion and stent length for ACS and DM subgroup : Length of single lesion < 24 mm and, Summation of total length of all inserted DES in 3 vessel < 60 mm
  • Lesion and stent length for long lesion subgroup : Length of single stent per single lesion > 28 mm and, Summation of total length of all inserted DES in 3 vessel ≤ 90 mm, Possible overlapping stent
  • Lesion and stent length for short lesion subgroup : Length of single lesion < 24 mm and, Summation of total length of all inserted DES in 3 vessel < 60 mm
  • Significant coronary artery stenosis (>50% by visual estimate) considered for coronary revascularization with stent implantation
  • Reference vessel diameter of 2.5 to 4.0 mm by operator assessment
  • Lesion success (30% or less residual stenosis by visual assessment over the entire stent length, with TIMI-3 flow and no more than an NHLBI type B peri-stent dissection

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindication to anti-platelet agents & bleeding history within prior 3 months
  • Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to any of the following medications: Heparin, Aspirin, Clopidogrel, limus related drug
  • Prior history of the following presentations : Cerebral vascular accident (not including transient ischemic attack, Peripheral artery occlusive diseases, Thromboembolic disease, Stent thrombosis
  • Severe hepatic dysfunction (3 times normal reference values)
  • Significant renal dysfunction (Serum creatinine > 2.0 mg/dl)
  • Significant leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, or known bleeding diathesis
  • Cardiogenic shock
  • LVEF < 40%
  • Pregnant women or women with potential childbearing
  • Life expectancy 3 year
  • Overlapped DESs(only long lesion subgroup is possible overlapping)
  • Left main disease requiring PCI
  • Bifurcation lesion with 2-stent technique
  • Target lesions with in-stent restenosis at the stented segment of DES or BMS
  • Lesions with chronic total occlusion
  • History of PCI with DES
  • In-stent restenosis lesion
Both
20 Years to 85 Years
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Korea, Republic of
 
NCT01145079
4-2009-0115
Yes
Yonsei University
Yonsei University
Not Provided
Principal Investigator: Myeong Ki Hong, MD, PhD Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine
Yonsei University
March 2013

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP