Real-life Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Qvar Versus FP and BDP in the Management of COPD (QvarCOPD)
| Tracking Information | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Received Date ICMJE | June 9, 2010 | ||||||||
| Last Updated Date | March 7, 2011 | ||||||||
| Start Date ICMJE | January 2001 | ||||||||
| Primary Completion Date | June 2007 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||||
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||||||
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||||
| Change History | Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01141452 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site | ||||||||
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||||||
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||||
| Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||||
| Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||||
| Descriptive Information | |||||||||
| Brief Title ICMJE | Real-life Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Qvar Versus FP and BDP in the Management of COPD | ||||||||
| Official Title ICMJE | Retrospective, Real-life Evaluation of the Effectiveness, Cost-effectiveness and Direct Healthcare Costs of Qvar Pressurised Metered-dose Inhaler (pMDI) Compared With Beclometasone Dipropionate pMDI and Fluticasone pMDI in the Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in a Representative UK Primary Care Patient Population | ||||||||
| Brief Summary | The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and direct healthcare costs of managing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in primary care patients with evidence of COPD who either initiate inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy, or have an increase in their ICS dose, as hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) beclometasone dipropionate (BDP) (hereafter Qvar®), CFC-BDP (hereafter BDP) and fluticasone propionate (FP) via pressurised metered-dose inhalers. |
||||||||
| Detailed Description | Current asthma guidelines in the UK are underpinned by evidence derived from randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Although RCT data are considered the gold standard, patients recruited to asthma RCTs are estimated to represent less than 10% of the UK's asthma population. The poor representation of the asthma population is due to a number of factors, such as tightly-controlled inclusion criteria for RCTs. There is, therefore, a need for more representative RCTs and real-life observational studies to inform existing guidelines and help optimise asthma outcomes. Short randomised trials have shown that Qvar is at least as effective as FP pMDI and as BDP pMDI at half the prescribed dose in patients with asthma. There is also evidence to suggest that, in adults, HFA formulation as used by Qvar (featuring BDP in solution rather than suspension) may achieve 10-fold higher deposition compared with CFC-BDP.4 Furthermore, deposition in the peripheral regions is higher compared with CFC-BDP and the fine-particle formulation also offers greater tolerance of poor co-ordination of breathing and inhaler actuation, resulting in lower oro-pharyngeal deposition compared with CFC-BDP. Evidence of the efficacy of ICS monotherapy in COPD remains mixed at this time. While Qvar and ICS monotherapy use in the treatment of COPD is currently off-label, it occurs in clinical practice in two common scenarios:
The study hypothesis, therefore, is that Qvar treatment in COPD may be associated with improved disease management and control (as assessed by effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and direct healthcare costs of managing COPD) compared with other commonly used ICS therapies, namely BPD and FP, by virtue of its improved deposition throughout the lungs and the small airways. |
||||||||
| Study Type ICMJE | Observational | ||||||||
| Study Design ICMJE | Observational Model: Cohort Time Perspective: Retrospective |
||||||||
| Target Follow-Up Duration | Not Provided | ||||||||
| Biospecimen | Not Provided | ||||||||
| Sampling Method | Non-Probability Sample | ||||||||
| Study Population | Primary care COPD patients who at an index prescription date either initiated ICS therapy as extrafine HFA-BDP, CFC-BDP or FP via MDI or had an increase in baseline BDP-equivalent ICS dose the index data as extrafine HFA-BDP, CFC-BDP or FP via MDI |
||||||||
| Condition ICMJE | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease | ||||||||
| Intervention ICMJE |
|
||||||||
| Study Group/Cohort (s) |
|
||||||||
| Publications * |
|
||||||||
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||||||
| Recruitment Information | |||||||||
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Completed | ||||||||
| Enrollment ICMJE | 815377 | ||||||||
| Completion Date | July 2007 | ||||||||
| Primary Completion Date | June 2007 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||||
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: - A diagnostic read code for any other chronic respiratory disease (except asthma) |
||||||||
| Gender | Both | ||||||||
| Ages | 40 Years to 80 Years | ||||||||
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No | ||||||||
| Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||||||||
| Location Countries ICMJE | United Kingdom | ||||||||
| Administrative Information | |||||||||
| NCT Number ICMJE | NCT01141452 | ||||||||
| Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | BA5 | ||||||||
| Has Data Monitoring Committee | Yes | ||||||||
| Responsible Party | Professor David Price, Research in Real Life Limited | ||||||||
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | Research in Real-Life Ltd | ||||||||
| Collaborators ICMJE | Teva Pharmaceutical Industries | ||||||||
| Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||||||
| Information Provided By | Research in Real-Life Ltd | ||||||||
| Verification Date | March 2011 | ||||||||
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|||||||||