Comparison Between Two Ultrasound Technologies for Ultrasound-guided Catheter Placement in Regional Anesthesia (eZono)
Recruitment status was Not yet recruiting
| Tracking Information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Received Date ICMJE | May 10, 2010 | ||||
| Last Updated Date | May 11, 2010 | ||||
| Start Date ICMJE | May 2010 | ||||
| Estimated Primary Completion Date | October 2010 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Reduction in time to perform the catheter placement in regional anesthesia [ Time Frame: first three days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] | ||||
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
| Change History | Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01122693 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site | ||||
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
| Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Descriptive Information | |||||
| Brief Title ICMJE | Comparison Between Two Ultrasound Technologies for Ultrasound-guided Catheter Placement in Regional Anesthesia | ||||
| Official Title ICMJE | A Prospective, Randomized Comparison Between Two Ultrasound Technologies for Ultrasound-guided Catheter Placement in Regional Anesthesia | ||||
| Brief Summary | The use of ultrasound imaging techniques in regional anaesthesia is rapidly becoming an area of increasing interest. It represents one of the largest changes that the field of regional anaesthesia has seen. For the first time, the operator is able to view an image of the target nerve directly, guide the needle under real-time observation, navigate away from sensitive anatomy, and monitor the spread of local anaesthetic (LA).The key to successful regional anaesthesia is deposition of LA accurately around the nerve structures. In the past, electrical stimulation which relied on surface landmark identification, was used for this. However, landmark techniques have limitations; variations in anatomy and nerve physiology , as well as equipment accuracy have had an effect on success rates and complications. However, alongside the enthusiasm of ultrasound guidance in regional anaesthesia, there should be a degree of informed scepticism. The widespread use of the various techniques of ultrasound-guided regional blocks without adequate training raises the danger of malpractice and subsequent impaired outcome. Adequate education in the use of regional block techniques under ultrasound guidance is essential. Recent technical developments have achieved higher ultrasound frequencies and better image resolution, as well as better post-processing and user-friendliness. The purpose of this study is to determine whether new technical features such as reference images, higher ultrasound frequencies, better image resolution and smaller size and weight of the ultrasound probes may improve outcome (clinical benefits) and may show an increased efficacy and safety. And if the new technology of ultrasound images improves the training quality of trainees and novices in the art of ultrasound-guided blocks. |
||||
| Detailed Description | Not Provided | ||||
| Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||
| Study Phase | Not Provided | ||||
| Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Diagnostic |
||||
| Condition ICMJE | Anesthesia | ||||
| Intervention ICMJE |
|
||||
| Study Arm (s) |
|
||||
| Publications * | Not Provided | ||||
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||
| Recruitment Information | |||||
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Not yet recruiting | ||||
| Estimated Enrollment ICMJE | 90 | ||||
| Estimated Completion Date | October 2010 | ||||
| Estimated Primary Completion Date | October 2010 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||
| Gender | Both | ||||
| Ages | 18 Years and older | ||||
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No | ||||
| Contacts ICMJE |
|
||||
| Location Countries ICMJE | Germany | ||||
| Administrative Information | |||||
| NCT Number ICMJE | NCT01122693 | ||||
| Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | EA 1/012/10 | ||||
| Has Data Monitoring Committee | Yes | ||||
| Responsible Party | Univ. Prof. Dr. med. Claudia Spies, Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine Campus Charité Mitte / Campus Virchow-Klinikum Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin | ||||
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | Charite University, Berlin, Germany | ||||
| Collaborators ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||
| Information Provided By | Charite University, Berlin, Germany | ||||
| Verification Date | May 2010 | ||||
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|||||