Clinical Trial of Solifenacin Versus Placebo Plus Pessary for Women With Vaginal Prolapse (PESSARY)
| Tracking Information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Received Date ICMJE | March 4, 2010 | ||||
| Last Updated Date | November 3, 2011 | ||||
| Start Date ICMJE | March 2010 | ||||
| Primary Completion Date | October 2011 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
The Effect of These Therapies on Over-Active Bladder Symptoms [ Time Frame: 14-Weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] Using the PFDI and PFIQ and a standardized medication response questionnaire to assess each subject's response to either the placebo or the solinefacin at Week 6 and Week 14, we will evaluate the effect of these therapies on subjects' bladder symptoms over the course of the study. |
||||
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
| Change History | Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01092624 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site | ||||
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Descriptive Information | |||||
| Brief Title ICMJE | Clinical Trial of Solifenacin Versus Placebo Plus Pessary for Women With Vaginal Prolapse | ||||
| Official Title ICMJE | A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Parallel-Design Trial of the Effect of Solifenacin Treatment for Overactive Bladder in Women With Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse Managed With a Pessary (the "PESSARY" Study) | ||||
| Brief Summary | This study will evaluate the effect of pessary therapy, with and without Solifenacin (Vesicare), on symptoms of over active bladder and bladder function in women with overactive bladder symptoms and pelvic organ prolapse. Study Hypotheses: Null hypothesis, HO: Reduction of anterior vaginal wall prolapse and treatment with solifenacin does not improve overactive bladder symptoms more than reduction of anterior vaginal wall prolapse and placebo. Alternate hypothesis, HA: Reduction of anterior vaginal wall prolapse and treatment with solifenacin does improve overactive bladder symptoms more than reduction of anterior vaginal wall prolapse and placebo. |
||||
| Detailed Description | Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) affects approximately half of all women over age 501. The most common type of POP is anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Symptoms associated with POP include: voiding dysfunction, defecatory dysfunction and vaginal bulge symptoms. Treatments for pelvic organ prolapse include among other options, vaginal pessary or surgery. Several studies have documented improved vaginal bulge symptoms in women treated with a pessary2,3,4; however, data are sparse regarding the effect of pessaries on lower urinary tract symptoms, specifically with regard to over active bladder symptoms. Overactive bladder, observed in approximately 40% of women 50 years of age or older, is very common in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Two retrospective studies have shown improvement in women with overactive bladder symptoms following treatment with a vaginal pessary. One study (using a non-validated questionnaire) found that, at two month follow-up, patients successfully fitted with a pessary experienced a reduction in slightly less than half of their urge incontinence symptoms.5 A second study (using the Sheffield pelvic organ prolapse symptom questionnaire), revealed that 4 months after insertion of a pessary, 38% of patients experienced reduced urinary urgency, and 29% experienced reduced urge urinary incontinence6. Despite these data, many women stop using a pessary secondary to complaints of increased urine incontinence. More information is needed on pessary therapy impact on bladder function. Specific Aim(s): This study will prospectively evaluate women with pelvic organ prolapse and overactive bladder symptoms treated with either
|
||||
| Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||
| Study Phase | Phase 4 | ||||
| Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
||||
| Condition ICMJE | Pelvic Organ Prolapse | ||||
| Intervention ICMJE |
|
||||
| Study Arm (s) |
|
||||
| Publications * | Not Provided | ||||
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||
| Recruitment Information | |||||
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Terminated | ||||
| Estimated Enrollment ICMJE | 94 | ||||
| Completion Date | October 2011 | ||||
| Primary Completion Date | October 2011 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||
| Gender | Female | ||||
| Ages | 18 Years and older | ||||
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No | ||||
| Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||||
| Location Countries ICMJE | United States | ||||
| Administrative Information | |||||
| NCT Number ICMJE | NCT01092624 | ||||
| Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | TULI003042, VESI-9I04 | ||||
| Has Data Monitoring Committee | No | ||||
| Responsible Party | Hartford Hospital | ||||
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | Hartford Hospital | ||||
| Collaborators ICMJE | Astellas Pharma Inc | ||||
| Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||
| Information Provided By | Hartford Hospital | ||||
| Verification Date | November 2011 | ||||
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|||||