Comparative Efficacy & Safety Study of D961H Versus Placebo for the Prevention of Gastric and Duodenal Ulcers With Low-dose Aspirin

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
AstraZeneca
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01069939
First received: February 16, 2010
Last updated: October 24, 2012
Last verified: October 2012

February 16, 2010
October 24, 2012
February 2010
November 2011   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Time From Randomization to Occurrence of Gastric and/or Duodenal Ulcers up to Data Cut-off Date for Interim Analysis. [ Time Frame: From randomisation to up to 48 weeks (Maximum follow-up period at the interim analysis) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Assessments for occurrence of gastric and/or duodenal ulcers were performed every 12 weeks after randomisation. The numbers of participants with recurrence of gastric and/or duodeal ulcers were analysed every 12 weeks up to 48 weeks.
Time from randomization to occurrence of gastric and/or duodenal ulcers [ Time Frame: Up to 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 and 72 weeks after randomisation ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01069939 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Change in Degree of Gastric Mucosal Lesion by Modified Lanza Scale From Baseline to Last Measurement up to Week 48 [ Time Frame: Up to 48 weeks (Baseline to last measurement) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Modified Lanza scale attributes the degree of gastric mucosal lesion, graded on a 5 point scale (0=No hemorrhage, no erosion, 1=One hemorrhage or one erosions, 2=2-10 hemorrhages or erosions, 3=11-25 hemorrhages or erosions, 4=More than 25 hemorrhages or erosions, or ulcer). Higher scores indicate greater severity of gastric mucosal lesion.
  • Number of Participants With Reflux Esophagitis Evaluated by the LA Classification up to Week 48. [ Time Frame: 12, 24, 36 and 48 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Endoscopy was conducted at 12, 24, 36 and 48 weeks after randomisation. At the endoscopy, participants was evaluated whether they have reflux esophagitis or not.
  • Change in the Severity of Epigastric Pain From Baseline to Last Measurement up to Week 48 [ Time Frame: Up to 48 weeks (Baseline to last measurement) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    The severity of epigastric pain at baseline and the last measurement up to 48 weeks was obtained (None, Mild, Moderate, Severe). If the value at the last was better in a participant, the participant was categorized into "Improved". If the value was same, categorised into "Unchanged". If the value was worsened, categorise into "Worsened".
  • Change in the Severity of Heartburn From Baseline to Last Measurement up to Week 48. [ Time Frame: Up to 48 weeks (Baseline to last measurement) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    The severity of heartburn at baseline and the last measurement up to 48 weeks was obtained (None, Mild, Moderate, Severe). If the value at the last was better in a participant, the participant was categorized into "Improved". If the value was same, categorised into "Unchanged". If the value was worsened, categorise into "Worsened".
  • Change in the Severity of Anorexia From Baseline to Last Measurement up to Week 48 [ Time Frame: Up to 48 weeks (Baseline to last measurement) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    The severity of anorexia at baseline and the last measurement up to 48 weeks was obtained (None, Mild, Moderate, Severe). If the value at the last was better in a participant, the participant was categorized into "Improved". If the value was same, categorised into "Unchanged". If the value was worsened, categorise into "Worsened".
  • Change in the Severity of Abdomen Enlarged Feeling From Baseline to Last Measurement up to Week [ Time Frame: Up to 48 weeks (Baseline to last measurement) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    The severity of abdomen enlarged feeling at baseline and the last measurement up to 48 weeks was obtained (None, Mild, Moderate, Severe). If the value at the last was better in a participant, the participant was categorized into "Improved". If the value was same, categorised into "Unchanged". If the value was worsened, categorise into "Worsened".
  • Change in the Severity of Nausea and/or Vomiting From Baseline to Last Measurement up to Week 48 [ Time Frame: Up to 48 weeks (Baseline to last measurement) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    The severity of Nausea and/or Vomiting at baseline and the last measurement up to 48 weeks was obtained (None, Mild, Moderate, Severe). If the value at the last was better in a participant, the participant was categorized into "Improved". If the value was same, categorised into "Unchanged". If the value was worsened, categorise into "Worsened".
  • Change in the Severity of Discomfort in the Stomach From Baseline to Last Measurement up to Week 48 [ Time Frame: Up to 48 weeks (Baseline to last measurement) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    The severity of Discomfort in the stomach at baseline and the last measurement up to 48 weeks was obtained (None, Mild, Moderate, Severe). If the value at the last was better in a participant, the participant was categorized into "Improved". If the value was same, categorised into "Unchanged". If the value was worsened, categorise into "Worsened".
  • Number of Participants With Adverse Events [ Time Frame: Up to 70 weeks at the longest ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
    Participants who had at least adverse events (AE) which occurred after receiving study drug were counted.
  • Degree of gastric mucosal lesion by modified LANZA score. Presence/absence and severity of RE evaluated by the LA classification [ Time Frame: Up to 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 and 72 weeks after randomisation ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Presence/absence and severity of gastrointestinal symptoms assessed by the investigator(s) at each visit [ Time Frame: Every 4 weeks up to 72 weeks after dandomization ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Adverse events, Clinical laboratory values, Vital signs [ Time Frame: Every 4 weeks up to 72 weeks after dandomization ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Comparative Efficacy & Safety Study of D961H Versus Placebo for the Prevention of Gastric and Duodenal Ulcers With Low-dose Aspirin
A Phase III Multinational, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Comparative Efficacy and Safety Study of D961H (20 mg Once Daily) Versus Placebo for Prevention of Gastric and/or Duodenal Ulcers Associated With Continuous Low-dose Aspirin (LDA) Use

To assess the efficacy of D961H 20 mg once daily (q.d.) versus placebo in continuous treatment involving patients with a history of gastric and/or duodenal ulcers receiving daily Low-dose aspirin therapy by evaluating time from randomisation to occurrence of gastric and/or duodenal ulcers.

Not Provided
Interventional
Phase 3
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Prevention
Prevention
  • Drug: Esomeprazole
    20mg, capsule, 72 weeks
  • Drug: Placebo
    Placebo, capsule, 72 weeks
  • Experimental: Esomeprazole 20mg
    Esomeprazole 20mg once daily oral
    Intervention: Drug: Esomeprazole
  • Placebo Comparator: Placebo
    Placebo once daily oral
    Intervention: Drug: Placebo
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
427
November 2011
November 2011   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Provision of written informed consent before starting the study-related procedures and examinations
  • Patients who have the history of gastric and/or duodenal ulcer.
  • A diagnosis of a chronic condition (angina pectoris, myocardial infarction and ischemic cerebrovascular disorder, etc., requiring prevention of thrombosis or embolism) which requires taking the prescribed LDA during the study treatment period.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having gastric or duodenal ulcer (except for ulcer scar).
  • History of esophageal, gastric or duodenal surgery, except for simple closure of perforation.
Both
20 Years and older
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Japan,   Korea, Republic of,   Taiwan
 
NCT01069939
D961PC00001
Yes
AstraZeneca
AstraZeneca
Not Provided
Principal Investigator: Kentaro Sugano, MD, PhD Jichi Medical University
AstraZeneca
October 2012

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP