Comparison of a PEG Membrane and a Collagen Membrane for the Treatment of Bone Dehiscence Defects at Bone Level Implants

This study is ongoing, but not recruiting participants.
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Institut Straumann AG
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01012921
First received: November 11, 2009
Last updated: June 6, 2012
Last verified: June 2012

November 11, 2009
June 6, 2012
September 2009
October 2011   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
non-inferiority of Straumann® MembraGel compared to a standard collagen membrane (Bio-Gide®)used for GBR in defects around Straumann implants. The bone fill will be assessed at baseline compared to 6 months after regenerative therapy. [ Time Frame: baseline to 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01012921 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • • Change of crestal bone level [ Time Frame: 6 months to 42 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • • Soft tissue parameters [ Time Frame: 6 months to 42 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
• Change of crestal bone level • Soft tissue parameters [ Time Frame: 6 months to 42 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Comparison of a PEG Membrane and a Collagen Membrane for the Treatment of Bone Dehiscence Defects at Bone Level Implants
Straumann® MembraGel Comparison of a PEG Membrane and a Collagen Membrane for the Treatment of Bone Dehiscence Defects at Bone Level Implants

The aim of the study is to test in a randomised comparative study the performance of Straumann® MembraGel (PEG Membrane) to act as a barrier for guided bone regeneration compared to that of a standard collagen membrane (BioGide®) in the bone regeneration around Straumann® SLActive bone level titanium implants.

Not Provided
Interventional
Not Provided
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Bone Dehiscence Defects
Device: Implant surgery
The in situ forming gel serves as a barrier membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR).
  • Active Comparator: Bio-Gide® membrane
    This is a biodegradable bilayer membrane for bone and tissue regeneration. It has a natural collagen structure and is of porcine origin.
    Intervention: Device: Implant surgery
  • Experimental: MembraGel
    The Straumann membrane is a synthetic degradable barrier membrane.
    Intervention: Device: Implant surgery
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Active, not recruiting
117
October 2014
October 2011   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects must have voluntarily signed the informed consent form before any study related action
  • Males and females must be at least 18 years of age and not more than 80 year old.
  • Have at least one missing tooth in the posterior mandible or maxilla in quadrant 1, 2, 3, 4 (FDI positions 4-7), requiring one or more dental implants.
  • Partially edentulous patients and patients in need of a fixed dental prosthesis
  • The tooth at the implant site(s) must have been extracted or lost at least 6 weeks before the date of implantation.
  • Bone defect(s) must be present with a vertical dimension greater than or equal to 3 mm at the foreseen GBR site measured after dental implant placement.
  • Full mouth bleeding on Probing (FMBoP) and full mouth plaque score (FMPI) are both lower or equal than 25%
  • Patients must be committed to the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of conditions requiring chronic routine prophylactic use of antibiotics (e.g., history of rheumatic heart disease, bacterial endocarditis, cardiac valvular anomalies, prosthetic joint replacements)
  • Major systemic diseases
  • Medical conditions requiring prolonged use of steroids
  • Use of Bisphosphonate intravenously
  • Current pregnancy or breastfeeding women
  • Physical or mental handicaps that would interfere with the ability to perform adequate oral hygiene
  • Alcoholism or chronically drug abuse
  • Immunocompromised patients
  • Patients who smoke more than 10 cigarettes per day or cigar equivalents, or who chew tobacco
  • Conditions or circumstances, in the opinion of the investigator, which would prevent completion of study participation or interfere with analysis of study results, such as history of non-compliance, or unreliability.

Local exclusion criteria

  • Local inflammation, including untreated periodontitis
  • Regenerative treatment necessary adjacent to the planned study site of interest
  • Mucosal diseases or oral lesions
  • History of local irradiation therapy
  • Severe bruxing or clenching habits
  • Persistent intraoral infection
  • Patients with inadequate oral hygiene or unmotivated for adequate home care
  • Previous GBR or GTR treatment at the implant site
  • Lack of primary stability of the dental implant at site of interest. In this instance the patient must be withdrawn and the patient treated accordingly (exclusion criteria at surgery)
Both
18 Years to 80 Years
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Belgium,   Germany,   Hungary,   Italy,   Spain,   Sweden,   Switzerland
 
NCT01012921
CR 07/07
No
Institut Straumann AG
Institut Straumann AG
Not Provided
Principal Investigator: Christoph Haemmerle, Prof. Dr. Medical University Zürich, Switzerland
Institut Straumann AG
June 2012

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP