Ritonavir-boosted Lopinavir Monotherapy
| Tracking Information | |
|---|---|
| First Received Date ICMJE | October 27, 2009 |
| Last Updated Date | November 10, 2011 |
| Start Date ICMJE | April 2007 |
| Primary Completion Date | February 2011 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
To assess 48-week treatment responses of ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r) monotherapy as salvage regimen. [ Time Frame: 48 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] |
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current |
| Change History | Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01002898 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site |
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided |
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided |
| Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided |
| Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided |
| Descriptive Information | |
| Brief Title ICMJE | Ritonavir-boosted Lopinavir Monotherapy |
| Official Title ICMJE | Treatment Outcomes and Plasma Level of Ritonavir-boosted Lopinavir Monotherapy Among HIV-infected Patients Who Had Non-nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor (NRTI) and NNRTI Failure: A Pilot Study |
| Brief Summary | To assess 48-week treatment responses, tolerability, and steady-state minimum plasma concentrations of ritonavir-boosted lopinavir monotherapy for salvage therapy in HIV-1 infected patients who failed antiretroviral regimens containing NRTI and NNRTI. |
| Detailed Description | Currently, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is widely prescribed as an initial therapy for treatment naïve HIV-infected patients, particularly in many resource-constrained countries. However, in patients who have delayed detection of treatment failure in this setting, the virus is often resistant to most existing nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and NNRTIs even failing from the first regimen. As a consequence, constructing the potent salvage regimens that combined 2 or 3 fully active drugs from existing drug classes is often impossible in many resource-constrained countries where new agents, such as integrase inhibitor and chemokine receptor antagonist, are neither available nor affordable. Nevertheless, the goal of attaining undetectable plasma HIV-1 RNA is remain mandatory. To date, several clinical studies derived from the western countries that included 2 or more active drugs clearly demonstrate effective therapeutic strategies for antiretroviral (ARV)-experienced HIV-1 infected patients. Hence, using ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor in a salvage therapy was considered to be an option in the resource-constrained countries and the limitations of remaining active NRTIs usually lead to ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor monotherapy as a salvage regimen. Among several previous reports using ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor, ritonavir-boosted lopinavir monotherapy has been extensively studied so far. Different strategies of ritonavir-boosted lopinavir monotherapy have been explored; however, most related clinical trials studied this regimen as either a treatment simplification strategy or induction therapy in treatment-naïve patients. A strategy to use ritonavir-boosted lopinavir monotherapy as a salvage regimen is not available. On the other hand, previous studies showed that continuation of lamivudine after emerging of the M184V mutation had somewhat benefit on immunological response and clinical progression in patients who had limited options of salvage regimens. Moreover, there is neither additional any other mutation nor increase resistance to other antiretroviral drugs. Thus, this is the reason why we added lamivudine to decrease viral fitness in the study regimen. The objective of this study was to assess 48-week treatment responses, tolerability, and steady-state minimum plasma concentrations of ritonavir-boosted lopinavir monotherapy for salvage therapy in HIV-1 infected patients who failed antiretroviral regimens containing NRTI and NNRTI. |
| Study Type ICMJE | Interventional |
| Study Phase | Phase 3 |
| Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Non-Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Condition ICMJE | HIV |
| Intervention ICMJE | Drug: lopinavir/ritonavir soft gel capsule
Ritonavir-boosted lopinavir in soft gel formulation at 400/100 mg and lamivudine at 150 mg were given twice daily.
Other Name: Kaletra |
| Study Arm (s) | Experimental: lopinavir/ritonavir
Intervention: Drug: lopinavir/ritonavir soft gel capsule |
| Publications * | Not Provided |
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|
| Recruitment Information | |
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Completed |
| Enrollment ICMJE | 40 |
| Completion Date | February 2011 |
| Primary Completion Date | February 2011 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
| Gender | Both |
| Ages | 18 Years and older |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No |
| Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects |
| Location Countries ICMJE | Thailand |
| Administrative Information | |
| NCT Number ICMJE | NCT01002898 |
| Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | 4/2551 |
| Has Data Monitoring Committee | Yes |
| Responsible Party | Bamrasnaradura Infectious Diseases Institute |
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | Bamrasnaradura Infectious Diseases Institute |
| Collaborators ICMJE | Not Provided |
| Investigators ICMJE | Not Provided |
| Information Provided By | Bamrasnaradura Infectious Diseases Institute |
| Verification Date | October 2009 |
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|