A Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of a New Influenza Candidate Vaccine MVA-NP+M1 In Healthy Adults
| Tracking Information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Received Date ICMJE | October 8, 2009 | ||||
| Last Updated Date | August 10, 2011 | ||||
| Start Date ICMJE | June 2009 | ||||
| Primary Completion Date | March 2010 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Safety of a new Influenza vaccine, MVA-NP+M1, when administered to healthy volunteers [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ] | ||||
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
| Change History | Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00993083 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site | ||||
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Cellular immune response generated by a new influenza vaccine MVA- NP+M1 when administered as a single dose to healthy adults. [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] | ||||
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
| Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Descriptive Information | |||||
| Brief Title ICMJE | A Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of a New Influenza Candidate Vaccine MVA-NP+M1 In Healthy Adults | ||||
| Official Title ICMJE | A Phase IIA Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of a New Influenza Candidate Vaccine MVA-NP+M1 In Healthy Adults | ||||
| Brief Summary | This is a Phase IIa open label, non placebo controlled, non-randomised controlled challenge study. The primary objective of this study is to assess the safety of a new influenza vaccine, MVA-NP+M1, when administered as a single dose to healthy volunteers. Initially two volunteers will be vaccinated and challenged with Influenza, followed by vaccination of a further 12 volunteers and an Influenza challenge of those 12 along with 12 non-vaccinated controls. |
||||
| Detailed Description | Antibodies against the external proteins of influenza can prevent the virus from infecting cells and either prevent infection or limit the spread of infection. However the surface proteins are highly variable and there is little antibody cross-reactivity between variants. Once a cell has been infected with the virus, it is then vulnerable to T cell attack resulting in the destruction of infected cells so that no more virus can be produced and the infection is controlled. There is evidence from clinical trials of influenza challenge, and animal models that T cell responses can protect in the absence of antibodies. Additionally, since T cells can recognise the highly conserved internal proteins of influenza, cross-subtype protection can be achieved. Seasonal influenza infection results in a T cell response to the virus which can protect against subsequent infection. However over the course of a few years these responses decline below protective levels. The new vaccine being tested in this study is designed to boost these T cell responses back to protective levels. Even responses that may be too low to be reliably quantified by currently available assays may still be boosted to high levels by a single dose of recombinant MVA. Since the internal proteins vary little between influenza subtypes, this could result in a 'universal' vaccine against influenza A. If the need to continually reformulate the vaccine in response to mutations in the viral coat proteins can be removed, the universal vaccine could be produced in large amounts and used more widely than the existing seasonal 'flu vaccines, thus protecting the population against currently circulating viruses and new virus types that are at present only found in avian species. There is very little polymorphism of NP and M1 between influenza A isolates. NP is 92% identical between H3N2 and H1N1 strains, and 91% identical between H3N2 and H5N1 strains. M1 is 95% identical between H3N2 and H1N1 strains, and 93% identical between H3N2 and H5N1 strains. This low level of variation appears to allow strong T cell cross-reactivity. MVA is a highly attenuated strain of vaccinia virus that is unable to replicate efficiently in human cell lines and most mammalian cells. Viral replication is blocked at a late stage of virion assembly, so, importantly, viral and recombinant protein synthesis is unimpaired. This means that MVA is an efficient single round expression vector, incapable of causing infection in mammals. Replication-deficient recombinant MVA has been seen as an exceptionally safe viral vector. This safety in man is consistent with the avirulence of MVA in animal models, where recombinant MVAs have also been shown to be protectively immunogenic as vaccines against viral diseases and cancer. Importantly for a vaccine which may eventually be used in a large proportion of the population, recombinant MVAs expressing HIV antigens have been shown to be safe and immunogenic in HIV-infected subjects. |
||||
| Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||
| Study Phase | Phase 2 | ||||
| Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Non-Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Prevention |
||||
| Condition ICMJE | Influenza | ||||
| Intervention ICMJE | Biological: MVA-NP+M1
Intramuscular injection at 1.5 x 10^8 pfu/ml at day 0 |
||||
| Study Arm (s) |
|
||||
| Publications * | Lillie PJ, Berthoud TK, Powell TJ, Lambe T, Mullarkey C, Spencer AJ, Hamill M, Peng Y, Blais ME, Duncan CJ, Sheehy SH, Havelock T, Faust SN, Williams RL, Gilbert A, Oxford J, Dong T, Hill AV, Gilbert SC. Preliminary assessment of the efficacy of a T-cell-based influenza vaccine, MVA-NP+M1, in humans. Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Jul;55(1):19-25. Epub 2012 Mar 22. | ||||
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||
| Recruitment Information | |||||
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Completed | ||||
| Enrollment ICMJE | 27 | ||||
| Completion Date | March 2010 | ||||
| Primary Completion Date | March 2010 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||
| Gender | Both | ||||
| Ages | 18 Years to 45 Years | ||||
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers | Yes | ||||
| Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||||
| Location Countries ICMJE | United Kingdom | ||||
| Administrative Information | |||||
| NCT Number ICMJE | NCT00993083 | ||||
| Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | Flu002 | ||||
| Has Data Monitoring Committee | Yes | ||||
| Responsible Party | Professor Adrian Hill, University of Oxford | ||||
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | University of Oxford | ||||
| Collaborators ICMJE | Wellcome Trust | ||||
| Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||
| Information Provided By | University of Oxford | ||||
| Verification Date | January 2011 | ||||
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|||||