Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) Versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Shawn St. Peter, Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00981604
First received: September 21, 2009
Last updated: December 12, 2011
Last verified: December 2011

September 21, 2009
December 12, 2011
August 2009
August 2011   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Operative Time [ Time Frame: 1 day ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00981604 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Operative complications [ Time Frame: 2 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • length of hospitalization [ Time Frame: 1 week ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • doses of analgesics [ Time Frame: 1 week ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • hospital/operation charges [ Time Frame: 1 week ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • surgeon perception of difficulty [ Time Frame: 1 day ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • cosmetic scores [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) Versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Single Incision Versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Prospective randomized trial of single incision versus standard 4 port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Hypothesis is that the operative time will be longer with single incision.

This will be a prospective, randomized clinical trial involving patients who present to the hospital with an indication for cholecystectomy. We will offer enrollment to several institutions provided they receive institutional approval.

This will be a definitive trial design. Based on our operative times with SILS compared with our recent experience in standard laparoscopy, a sample size of 60 patients will give us a power of 0.8 with an α of 0.05.

After the procedure, both groups will be managed in the same manner per routine care. They will be discharged when tolerating a regular diet and their pain is well-controlled on oral pain medication.

Interventional
Not Provided
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Cholelithiasis
  • Biliary Dyskinesia
  • Procedure: SILS
    Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
    Other Name: SILS
  • Procedure: Standard Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
    4 port technique
    Other Name: Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
  • Active Comparator: SILS Cholecystectomy
    Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
    Intervention: Procedure: SILS
  • Active Comparator: Standard Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
    4 port laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Intervention: Procedure: Standard Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
60
August 2011
August 2011   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Need for cholecystectomy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Need for cholangiogram
Both
1 Year to 18 Years
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United States
 
NCT00981604
09 07 132
No
Shawn St. Peter, Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City
Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City
Not Provided
Principal Investigator: Daniel J Ostlie, MD Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City
Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City
December 2011

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP