Cryoenergy Or Radiofrequency for Pulmonary Vein Isolation (COR)

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Collaborator:
Spanish Society of Cardiology
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Nicasio Perez Castellano, Hospital San Carlos, Madrid
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00969735
First received: August 28, 2009
Last updated: April 1, 2013
Last verified: April 2013

August 28, 2009
April 1, 2013
July 2009
May 2012   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Proportion of patients without AF recurrences longer than 2 minutes [ Time Frame: At the 12th month from ablation (using a blanking period of 3 months following ablation) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00969735 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Time to first AF recurrence longer than 2 minutes [ Time Frame: Within the first 12 months from ablation (using a blanking period of 3 months following ablation, and without the use of any blanking period) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Cumulative burden of AF (number of AF episodes longer than 2 minutes) [ Time Frame: At the 12th month from ablation (using a blanking period of 3 months following ablation) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Cumulative burden of AF (percentage of time in AF) [ Time Frame: At the 12th month from ablation (using a blanking period of 3 months following ablation) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Proportion of patients with episodes of regular atrial tachycardia or atrial flutter requiring treatment with drugs, electrical cardioversion or ablation. [ Time Frame: Within the first 12 months from ablation ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Quality of Life and symptom status [ Time Frame: At the 12th month from ablation ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Proportion of patients with procedure-related complications [ Time Frame: Within the first 12 months from ablation ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • Procedure time (minutes elapsed from the first puncture of the femoral vein to the removal of the last catheter) [ Time Frame: At the end of the ablation procedure ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Ablation time (minutes elapsed from the onset of the first energy delivery to the end of the last energy delivery). [ Time Frame: At the end of the ablation procedure ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Fluoroscopy time (minutes of fluoroscopy used during the entire ablation procedure) [ Time Frame: At the end of the ablation procedure ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Proportion of pulmonary veins remaining isolated [ Time Frame: At the end of the ablation procedure ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Cryoenergy Or Radiofrequency for Pulmonary Vein Isolation
Cryoenergy Or Radiofrequency for Pulmonary Vein Isolation (COR Trial)

This is a prospective single-center randomized trial comparing the efficacy and safety of PV cryoablation with the Arctic Front® catheter versus the standard PV isolation using radiofrequency irrigated tip catheters. The efficacy of both strategies will be evaluated from a clinical point of view and from the detection and quantification of AF episodes by means of the Reveal XT® implantable loop recorder.

Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation using a radiofrequency catheter is the most widespread technique for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. These procedures are difficult and time-consuming, because they require precise catheter manipulation and multiple radiofrequency applications. Thus, alternative techniques are being investigated to simplify the procedure. Recently, a cryoenergy balloon catheter has been developed for PV isolation (Arctic Front®, Cryocath Technologies). When this catheter is deployed at the PV antrum, it can create a circumferential lesion around the PV ostium by delivering a single cryoenergy application.

An implantable loop recorder for AF detection has been made available (Reveal XT®, Medtronic). It may help taking clinical decisions regarding anticoagulant and antiarrhythmic therapy and, at the same time, it may be a powerful tool to evaluate the efficacy of different therapeutic strategies.

This is a prospective single-center randomized trial comparing the efficacy and safety of PV cryoablation with the Arctic Front® catheter vs. the standard PV isolation using radiofrequency irrigated tip catheters. The efficacy of both strategies will be evaluated from a clinical point of view and from the detection and quantification of AF episodes by means of the Reveal XT® implantable loop recorder.

Interventional
Phase 4
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Atrial Fibrillation
  • Device: Pulmonary vein cryoablation
    A deflectable over-the-wire cryoablation balloon catheter (Arctic Front®) will be inflated and be positioned at each PV antrum. Then, cryoenergy will be delivered for 300 seconds. During cryoablation of the right PVs, the right phrenic nerve integrity will be monitored by the observation of right hemi-diaphragm contractions in response to right phrenic nerve pacing at the superior vena cava. Once the 4 PVs are cryoablated, the Arctic Front® catheter will be replaced by a decapolar PV mapping circular catheter (Lasso®, Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, California, EEUU) to evaluate PV conduction. A second cryoablation application may be delivered at each PV, if necessary. Crossover to RF ablation to complete PV isolation is discouraged.
    Other Name: Cryoenergy balloon catheter ablation
  • Device: Pulmonary vein radiofrequency ablation
    Ablation approach is ostial electrical isolation of all PVs with simultaneous use of the CARTO® electroanatomic mapping system (Biosense Webster, Tirat-Ha-Carmel, Israel). PV isolation will be performed by delivering RF energy at ostial sites with earliest PV potentials. Flow rate during the RF applications will be set at 15 mL/min (baseline 2 mL/min). Temperature and power limits will be set at 45ºC and 35 W. It will be allowed a 5 W reduction in power limit setting for small PVs (angiographic supero-inferior diameter > 12 mm), and a 5 W increase in areas located away from the esophagus, and for focal applications at sites resistant to ablation or recurrent gaps. The end-point of ablation will be to achieve bidirectional PV conduction block.
    Other Name: Pulmonary vein isolation
  • Active Comparator: Cryoablation
    Deflectable over-the-wire cryoablation balloon catheter (Arctic Front®, Cryocath Technologies)
    Intervention: Device: Pulmonary vein cryoablation
  • Active Comparator: Radiofrequency ablation
    Open irrigation ablation catheter (Navistar® Thermo-cool®, Biosense Webster Inc).
    Intervention: Device: Pulmonary vein radiofrequency ablation
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
50
May 2012
May 2012   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Symptomatic recurrent paroxysmal AF (>2 episodes in the last 6 months), and
  • Refractory to one or more class I or III antiarrhythmic drugs, and
  • PV anatomy consisting of 4 single PV, with the long diameter of the right superior PV ostium ≤ 20 mm.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age: < 18 or > 75 year-old
  • Prior AF ablation
  • Pregnancy
  • Concomitant acute illness
  • Hyperthyroidism
  • Moderate to severe valvular heart disease
  • Prior cardiac surgery
  • Left atrium > 50 mm (anteroposterior diameter, parasternal long-axis view)
  • Intracardiac thrombus
  • Contraindications for anticoagulant therapy
  • Inability to be followed in our center for at least 1 year
Both
18 Years to 75 Years
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Spain
 
NCT00969735
COR-1
No
Nicasio Perez Castellano, Hospital San Carlos, Madrid
Hospital San Carlos, Madrid
Spanish Society of Cardiology
Principal Investigator: Nicasio Pérez Castellano, MD, PhD Unidad de Arritmias, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
Hospital San Carlos, Madrid
April 2013

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP