| July 28, 2009 |
| September 15, 2011 |
| August 2009 |
| March 2010 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
- Clinical Success at Test of Cure (TOC) for the intent-to-treat (ITT) population [ Time Frame: 7 to 14 days after the last dose of study drug ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Meets the following definition for clinical success: continued complete resolution of the signs and symptoms of the ABSSI and no additional systemic antibacterial therapy is required
- Clinical Success at Test of Cure (TOC) for the clinically evaluable (CE) population [ Time Frame: 7 to 14 days after the last dose of study drug ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Meets the following definition for clinical success: continued complete resolution of the signs and symptoms of the ABSSI and no additional systemic antibacterial therapy is required
|
| Clinical Success rates in the clinically evaluable (CE) and Intent-to-Treat (ITT) patient populations at the test of cure (TOC) visit. [ Time Frame: 16 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] |
| Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00948142 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site |
- Clinical Success at end of treatment (EOT) for the intent-to-treat (ITT) population [ Time Frame: 10-14 days of study drug ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Meets the following definition for clinical success: Complete resolution of the signs and symptoms of the ABSSI and no further study drug therapy is required.
- Clinical Success at the test of cure (TOC) in the microbiological intent-to-treat (MITT) and population [ Time Frame: 7 to 14 days after the last dose of study drug ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Meets the following definition for clinical success: Complete resolution of the signs and symptoms of the ABSSI and no additional systemic antibacterial therapy is required.
- Clinical Success at the end of treatment (EOT) for the Clinically evaluable (CE) population [ Time Frame: 10-14 days of study drug ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Meets the following definition for clinical success: complete resolution of the signs and symptoms of the ABSSI and no further study drug therapy is required.
- Clinical success at the end of treatment (EOT) for the microbiological intent-to-treat (MITT) population [ Time Frame: 10-14 days of study drug ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Meets the following definition for clinical success at the end of treatment: complete resolutoin of the signs and symptoms of the ABSSI and no additional systemic antibacterial therapy is required
- Clinical Success at end of treatment (EOT) for the microbiologically evaluable (ME) population [ Time Frame: 10-14 days of study drug ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Meets the following definition for clinical success: complete resolution of signs and symptoms of the ABSSI and no additional systemic antibacterial therapy is required.
- Clinical Success at test of cure (TOC) for the microbiologically evaluable (ME) population [ Time Frame: 7-14 days after the last dose of study drug ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Meets the following definition of clinical success: continued complete resolution of the signs and symptoms of the ABSSI and no additional systemic antibacterial therapy is required.
- Clinical success at the test of cure (TOC) by baseline pathogen for the microbiological intent-to-treat (MITT) population [ Time Frame: 7-14 days after the last dose of study drug ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Meets the following definition for clinical success: continued complete resolution of the signs and symptoms of the ABSSI and no additonal systemic antibacterial therapy is required
- Clinical success at test of cure (TOC) by baseline pathogen for the microbiologically evaluable (ME) population [ Time Frame: 7 to 14 days after the last dose of study drug ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Meets the following definition for clinical success: continued complete resolution of the signs and symptoms of the ABSSI and no additional systemic antibacterial therapy is required
- By-pathogen microbiological success at test of cure (TOC) for the microbiological intent-to-treat (MITT) population [ Time Frame: 7-14 days after the last dose of study drug ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Successful responses included:
eradication: the basline causative pathogen was absent from the culture(s) presumed eradication: the patient's clincial response was success, and no culture available.
- By-pathogen microbiological success at test of cure (TOC) for the microbiologically evaluable (ME) population [ Time Frame: 7-14 days after the last dose of study drug ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Successful responses included:
eradication: the basline causative pathogen was absent from the culture(s) presumed eradication: the patient's clincial response was success, and no culture available.
- By-patient microbiological success at test of cure (TOC) for the microbiological intent-to-treat (MITT) population [ Time Frame: 7-14 days after the last dose of study drug ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Successful responses included:
eradication: the baseline causative organisms have a response of eradication. presumed eradication: all baseline causative organism(s) have a response of presumed eradication combined eradication/presumed eradication: in cases where baseline causative organisms were from a blood and an ABSSI culture
- By-patient microbiological success at test of cure (TOC) for the microbiologically evaluable (ME) population [ Time Frame: 7-14 days after the last dose of study drug ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Successful responses included:
eradication: the baseline causative organisms have a response of eradication. presumed eradication: all baseline causative organism(s) have a response of presumed eradication combined eradication/presumed eradication: in cases where baseline causative organisms were from a blood and an ABSSI culture
|
- Clinical Response in the Microbiological ITT (MITT), CE, and Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) populations at end of treatment (EOT) [ Time Frame: 16 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Clinical Response in the MITT and ME populations at TOC [ Time Frame: 16 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- By patient and by pathogen Microbiological Response in the MITT and ME populations at EOT and TOC [ Time Frame: 16 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
|
| Not Provided |
| Not Provided |
| |
| Safety and Efficacy of CEM-102 Compared to Linezolid in Acute Bacterial Skin Infections |
| A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of CEM-102 Compared to Linezolid in the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin Structure Infections |
The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of CEM-102 compared to Linezolid in the treatment of acute bacterial skin structure infections (ABSSIs). |
ABSSIs are common and affect all age groups. In recent years, ABSSIs caused by multi-drug resistant pathogens, especially methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) have become more common. There is an urgent need for additional antibacterial drugs with modes of action different from those currently available. CEM-102 is one such agent with excellent activity against S. aureus, including MRSA. |
| Interventional |
| Phase 2 |
Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Skin Diseases, Bacterial |
|
|
- Active Comparator: Linezolid
600 mg BID
Intervention: Drug: Linezolid
- Experimental: CEM-102 Regimen A
Intervention: Drug: CEM-102
- Experimental: CEM-102 Regimen B
Intervention: Drug: CEM-102
|
| Craft JC, Moriarty SR, Clark K, Scott D, Degenhardt TP, Still JG, Corey GR, Das A, Fernandes P. A randomized, double-blind phase 2 study comparing the efficacy and safety of an oral fusidic acid loading-dose regimen to oral linezolid for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Jun;52 Suppl 7:S520-6. |
| |
| Completed |
| 198 |
| March 2010 |
| March 2010 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of acute bacterial skin-structure infection (ABSSI) of no more than 7 days duration which was suspected or proven to be caused, at least in part, by a gram-positive pathogen.
- Eligible infections included cellulitis measuring at least 10 cm length and width or 100 cm squared, with or without a focal abscess, and surgical or traumatic wound infections
- Infection which in the opinion of the investigator will require 10-14 days of antibacterial therapy.
- Have at least 3 of the following local and/or systemic symptoms and/or signs of infection: purulent or seropurulent drainage/discharge, erythema, fluctuance, heat/localized warmth, pain/tenderness to palpation, swelling/induration, regional lymph node swelling or tenderness, temperature >=100.4 degree F, increased white blood cell count, or bandemia.
- Must not have received treatment with another systemic antibiotic for the current ABSSI.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Superficial skin structure infections such as folliculitis, carbuncles, furunculosis, cutaneous abscesses, and simple cellulitis.
- Infections involving burns, human or animal bites, or chronic diabetic foot ulcers.
- Suspected polymicrobial infection involving Pseudomonas aeruginosa
- Anticipated need for >14 days of antibiotic therapy.
- Infections complicated by the presence of prosthetic materials that will not be removed, such as permanent cardiac pacemaker battery packs, mesh, or joint replacement prosthesis.
- Known significant renal, hepatic, or hematologic impairment.
- Received prior potentially effective antimicrobial therapy for the acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection, unless they were failing therapy after 48 hours or had a gram-positive pathogen non-susceptible to prior therapy identified as a causative pathogen.
|
| Both |
| 18 Years and older |
| No |
| Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects |
| United States |
| |
| NCT00948142 |
| CE06-300 |
| No |
| Cempra Pharmaceuticals |
| Cempra Pharmaceuticals |
| Not Provided
| Not Provided
| Cempra Pharmaceuticals |
| September 2011 |