Safety and Efficacy of CEM-102 Compared to Linezolid in Acute Bacterial Skin Infections

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Cempra Pharmaceuticals
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00948142
First received: July 28, 2009
Last updated: September 15, 2011
Last verified: September 2011

July 28, 2009
September 15, 2011
August 2009
March 2010   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
  • Clinical Success at Test of Cure (TOC) for the intent-to-treat (ITT) population [ Time Frame: 7 to 14 days after the last dose of study drug ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Meets the following definition for clinical success: continued complete resolution of the signs and symptoms of the ABSSI and no additional systemic antibacterial therapy is required
  • Clinical Success at Test of Cure (TOC) for the clinically evaluable (CE) population [ Time Frame: 7 to 14 days after the last dose of study drug ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Meets the following definition for clinical success: continued complete resolution of the signs and symptoms of the ABSSI and no additional systemic antibacterial therapy is required
Clinical Success rates in the clinically evaluable (CE) and Intent-to-Treat (ITT) patient populations at the test of cure (TOC) visit. [ Time Frame: 16 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00948142 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Clinical Success at end of treatment (EOT) for the intent-to-treat (ITT) population [ Time Frame: 10-14 days of study drug ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Meets the following definition for clinical success: Complete resolution of the signs and symptoms of the ABSSI and no further study drug therapy is required.
  • Clinical Success at the test of cure (TOC) in the microbiological intent-to-treat (MITT) and population [ Time Frame: 7 to 14 days after the last dose of study drug ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Meets the following definition for clinical success: Complete resolution of the signs and symptoms of the ABSSI and no additional systemic antibacterial therapy is required.
  • Clinical Success at the end of treatment (EOT) for the Clinically evaluable (CE) population [ Time Frame: 10-14 days of study drug ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Meets the following definition for clinical success: complete resolution of the signs and symptoms of the ABSSI and no further study drug therapy is required.
  • Clinical success at the end of treatment (EOT) for the microbiological intent-to-treat (MITT) population [ Time Frame: 10-14 days of study drug ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Meets the following definition for clinical success at the end of treatment: complete resolutoin of the signs and symptoms of the ABSSI and no additional systemic antibacterial therapy is required
  • Clinical Success at end of treatment (EOT) for the microbiologically evaluable (ME) population [ Time Frame: 10-14 days of study drug ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Meets the following definition for clinical success: complete resolution of signs and symptoms of the ABSSI and no additional systemic antibacterial therapy is required.
  • Clinical Success at test of cure (TOC) for the microbiologically evaluable (ME) population [ Time Frame: 7-14 days after the last dose of study drug ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Meets the following definition of clinical success: continued complete resolution of the signs and symptoms of the ABSSI and no additional systemic antibacterial therapy is required.
  • Clinical success at the test of cure (TOC) by baseline pathogen for the microbiological intent-to-treat (MITT) population [ Time Frame: 7-14 days after the last dose of study drug ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Meets the following definition for clinical success: continued complete resolution of the signs and symptoms of the ABSSI and no additonal systemic antibacterial therapy is required
  • Clinical success at test of cure (TOC) by baseline pathogen for the microbiologically evaluable (ME) population [ Time Frame: 7 to 14 days after the last dose of study drug ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Meets the following definition for clinical success: continued complete resolution of the signs and symptoms of the ABSSI and no additional systemic antibacterial therapy is required
  • By-pathogen microbiological success at test of cure (TOC) for the microbiological intent-to-treat (MITT) population [ Time Frame: 7-14 days after the last dose of study drug ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

    Successful responses included:

    eradication: the basline causative pathogen was absent from the culture(s) presumed eradication: the patient's clincial response was success, and no culture available.

  • By-pathogen microbiological success at test of cure (TOC) for the microbiologically evaluable (ME) population [ Time Frame: 7-14 days after the last dose of study drug ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

    Successful responses included:

    eradication: the basline causative pathogen was absent from the culture(s) presumed eradication: the patient's clincial response was success, and no culture available.

  • By-patient microbiological success at test of cure (TOC) for the microbiological intent-to-treat (MITT) population [ Time Frame: 7-14 days after the last dose of study drug ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

    Successful responses included:

    eradication: the baseline causative organisms have a response of eradication. presumed eradication: all baseline causative organism(s) have a response of presumed eradication combined eradication/presumed eradication: in cases where baseline causative organisms were from a blood and an ABSSI culture

  • By-patient microbiological success at test of cure (TOC) for the microbiologically evaluable (ME) population [ Time Frame: 7-14 days after the last dose of study drug ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

    Successful responses included:

    eradication: the baseline causative organisms have a response of eradication. presumed eradication: all baseline causative organism(s) have a response of presumed eradication combined eradication/presumed eradication: in cases where baseline causative organisms were from a blood and an ABSSI culture

  • Clinical Response in the Microbiological ITT (MITT), CE, and Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) populations at end of treatment (EOT) [ Time Frame: 16 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Clinical Response in the MITT and ME populations at TOC [ Time Frame: 16 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • By patient and by pathogen Microbiological Response in the MITT and ME populations at EOT and TOC [ Time Frame: 16 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Safety and Efficacy of CEM-102 Compared to Linezolid in Acute Bacterial Skin Infections
A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of CEM-102 Compared to Linezolid in the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin Structure Infections

The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of CEM-102 compared to Linezolid in the treatment of acute bacterial skin structure infections (ABSSIs).

ABSSIs are common and affect all age groups. In recent years, ABSSIs caused by multi-drug resistant pathogens, especially methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) have become more common. There is an urgent need for additional antibacterial drugs with modes of action different from those currently available. CEM-102 is one such agent with excellent activity against S. aureus, including MRSA.

Interventional
Phase 2
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Skin Diseases, Bacterial
  • Drug: CEM-102
    600 mg BID oral tablets for 10-14 days
    Other Name: fusidic acid
  • Drug: Linezolid
    600 mg BID oral tablets
    Other Name: Zyvox
  • Drug: CEM-102
    1500 mg BID oral tablets on Day 1 followed by 600 mg BID oral tablets for a total of 10-14 days
    Other Name: fusidic acid
  • Active Comparator: Linezolid
    600 mg BID
    Intervention: Drug: Linezolid
  • Experimental: CEM-102 Regimen A
    Intervention: Drug: CEM-102
  • Experimental: CEM-102 Regimen B
    Intervention: Drug: CEM-102
Craft JC, Moriarty SR, Clark K, Scott D, Degenhardt TP, Still JG, Corey GR, Das A, Fernandes P. A randomized, double-blind phase 2 study comparing the efficacy and safety of an oral fusidic acid loading-dose regimen to oral linezolid for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Jun;52 Suppl 7:S520-6.

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
198
March 2010
March 2010   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of acute bacterial skin-structure infection (ABSSI) of no more than 7 days duration which was suspected or proven to be caused, at least in part, by a gram-positive pathogen.
  • Eligible infections included cellulitis measuring at least 10 cm length and width or 100 cm squared, with or without a focal abscess, and surgical or traumatic wound infections
  • Infection which in the opinion of the investigator will require 10-14 days of antibacterial therapy.
  • Have at least 3 of the following local and/or systemic symptoms and/or signs of infection: purulent or seropurulent drainage/discharge, erythema, fluctuance, heat/localized warmth, pain/tenderness to palpation, swelling/induration, regional lymph node swelling or tenderness, temperature >=100.4 degree F, increased white blood cell count, or bandemia.
  • Must not have received treatment with another systemic antibiotic for the current ABSSI.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Superficial skin structure infections such as folliculitis, carbuncles, furunculosis, cutaneous abscesses, and simple cellulitis.
  • Infections involving burns, human or animal bites, or chronic diabetic foot ulcers.
  • Suspected polymicrobial infection involving Pseudomonas aeruginosa
  • Anticipated need for >14 days of antibiotic therapy.
  • Infections complicated by the presence of prosthetic materials that will not be removed, such as permanent cardiac pacemaker battery packs, mesh, or joint replacement prosthesis.
  • Known significant renal, hepatic, or hematologic impairment.
  • Received prior potentially effective antimicrobial therapy for the acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection, unless they were failing therapy after 48 hours or had a gram-positive pathogen non-susceptible to prior therapy identified as a causative pathogen.
Both
18 Years and older
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United States
 
NCT00948142
CE06-300
No
Cempra Pharmaceuticals
Cempra Pharmaceuticals
Not Provided
Not Provided
Cempra Pharmaceuticals
September 2011

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP