Ventricular Tachycardia (VT) Ablation Versus Enhanced Drug Therapy (VANISH)
| Tracking Information | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Received Date ICMJE | May 20, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Updated Date | February 20, 2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Start Date ICMJE | May 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Estimated Primary Completion Date | May 2014 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Appropriate ICD shocks,VT storm and death [ Time Frame: 5 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Appropriate ICD shocks and death [ Time Frame: 5 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Change History | Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00905853 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
All cause mortality [ Time Frame: 5 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Descriptive Information | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Brief Title ICMJE | Ventricular Tachycardia (VT) Ablation Versus Enhanced Drug Therapy | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Official Title ICMJE | Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation vs. Enhanced Drug Therapy in Structural Heart Disease | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Brief Summary | This study will compare aggressive antiarrhythmic therapy to catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia in patients who have suffered prior myocardial infarction. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the optimal management of patients presenting with recurrent VT and receiving ICD therapy in spite of first-line antiarrhythmic drug therapy. The hypothesis is catheter ablation is superior to aggressive antiarrhythmic drug therapy for recurrent VT. |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Detailed Description | This is a multicentre, parallel group, two arm, unblinded, randomized clinical trial to compare two management strategies for patients with ischemic heart disease and recurrent ICD therapy despite at least one antiarrhythmic drug. The primary endpoint will be a composite of appropriate ICD shocks or death. |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Study Type ICMJE | Observational | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Study Design ICMJE | Observational Model: Cohort Time Perspective: Prospective |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Target Follow-Up Duration | Not Provided | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Biospecimen | Not Provided | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Sampling Method | Probability Sample | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Study Population | Patients with ischemic heart disease presenting with appropriate ICD therapy for ventricular tachycardia in spite of first-line antiarrhythmic drug therapy. |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Condition ICMJE | Recurrent Ventricular Tachycardia | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Intervention ICMJE |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Study Group/Cohort (s) | Ischemic Heart Disease, Recurrent VT, ICD
Patients with prior myocardial infarction who have experienced recurrent appropriate ICD therapy for ventricular tachycardia in spite of first-line antiarrhythmic drug therapy.
Interventions:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Publications * | Not Provided | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Recruitment Information | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Recruiting | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Estimated Enrollment ICMJE | 260 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Estimated Completion Date | December 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Estimated Primary Completion Date | May 2014 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Gender | Both | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Ages | 18 Years and older | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Contacts ICMJE |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Location Countries ICMJE | Canada | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Administrative Information | |||||||||||||||||||||
| NCT Number ICMJE | NCT00905853 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | Sapp001 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Has Data Monitoring Committee | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Responsible Party | John Sapp, Capital District Health Authority, Canada | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | John Sapp | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Collaborators ICMJE |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Information Provided By | Capital District Health Authority, Canada | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Verification Date | February 2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|||||||||||||||||||||