Pilot Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Lidoderm Patch in the Treatment of Low Back Pain

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by:
Endo Pharmaceuticals
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00904475
First received: May 15, 2009
Last updated: February 12, 2010
Last verified: February 2010

May 15, 2009
February 12, 2010
April 2003
April 2003   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Mean change in average daily pain intensity (BPI Question 5) from baseline week to the final week of treatment (primary endpoint) [ Time Frame: Visit - V2 (Day 0), V3 (Day 7), V4 (Day 14), V5 (Day 28), V6/EOS (Day 42) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00904475 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Mean change from baseline to Week 2 and Week6/EOS in average daily pain intensity (BPI Question 5) [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Pain relief (BPI Question 8) [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Mean change from baseline to Week 2 and Week 6 in Pain Quality Assessment Scale (PQAS) [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Patient and Investigator Global Impression of Pain Relief at Week 6 [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • QoL: Change from baseline to Week 6 in pain interference with QoL (BPI Question 9) and Profile of Mood States (POMS) [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Safety assessments included AEs, discontinuations as a result of AEs, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, physical examination, plasma lidocaine levels, dermal assessments and sking sensory testing [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Pilot Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Lidoderm Patch in the Treatment of Low Back Pain
A Prospective, Prospective, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Pilot Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Lidoderm Patch in the Treatment of Low Back Pain

Patients with moderate to severe chronic Low Back Pain (LBP) despite current analgesic treatment participated in a Phase IV clinical trial to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of the lidocaine patch 5% compared to placebo in treating moderate to severe chronic LBP.

Not Provided
Interventional
Phase 4
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Chronic Low Back Pain
Drug: Lidoderm®
Eligible patients were randomized equally to one of two groups: lidocaine patch 5% or matching placebo patch. During the 6-week treatment period, patients used up to three patches daily applied q24h.
Other Name: Lidocaine patch 5%
  • Experimental: 1- Lidoderm®
    Lidoderm (lidocaine patch 5%), up to three patches applied topically once daily (q24h) to the area of maximal peripheral pain
    Intervention: Drug: Lidoderm®
  • Placebo Comparator: 2-Placebo
    Matching placebo, up to three patches applied topically once daily (q24h) to the area of maximal peripheral pain
    Intervention: Drug: Lidoderm®
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
102
Not Provided
April 2003   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Were currently experiencing moderate/severe pain despite current analgesic treatment
  2. Had daily moderate-to-severe LBP for at least 3 months duration
  3. Had a mean daily pain intensity score of >6 on a 0 to 10 scale, with 0 being no pain and 10 being pain as bad as the patients have ever imagined (Question 5 of BPI) during the baseline week; patients had to complete daily diary assessments at least 5 of 7 days during the baseline week

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Had a history of greater than one back surgery, or one back surgery within 3 months of study entry
  2. Had severe spinal stenosis
  3. Had chronic back pain of >12 months duration with an undefined spinal diagnosis
  4. Had radicular symptoms with radiation into the thigh or below (i.e., knee, calf, foot, etc.)
  5. Had received an epidural steroid/local anesthetic injection within 2 weeks prior to study entry
  6. Had received trigger point injections within 2 weeks prior to study entry
  7. Had received Botulinum Toxin Injections for LBP within 3 months prior to study entry
  8. Were taking a lidocaine-containing product that could not be discontinued while receiving study medication
  9. Were taking class 1 anti-arrhythmic drugs (e.g., mexiletine, tocainide)
  10. Had received Lidoderm for LBP in the past
Both
18 Years and older
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United States
 
NCT00904475
EN3220-011
Not Provided
Sr. Director, Clinical R&D, Endo Pharmaceuticals
Endo Pharmaceuticals
Not Provided
Study Director: Sr. Director Endo Pharmaceuticals
Endo Pharmaceuticals
February 2010

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP