A Study Comparing Eribulin Mesylate and Ixabepilone in Causing or Exacerbating Neuropathy in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer

This study is ongoing, but not recruiting participants.
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Eisai Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00879086
First received: April 8, 2009
Last updated: June 5, 2013
Last verified: June 2013

April 8, 2009
June 5, 2013
March 2009
April 2013   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Percent of subjects with neuropathy adverse events (AEs) graded according to NCI CTCAE (version 3.0) and coded according to the current version of Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). [ Time Frame: Neuropathy assessments are performed at the start of Cycles 2-6 and subsequently at every third cycle, end-of-treatment visit, and post-treatment follow-up. ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
Neuropathy adverse events (AEs) graded according to NCI CTCAE (version 3.0) and coded according to the current version of Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). [ Time Frame: Neuropathy assessments are performed at the start of Cycles 2-6 and subsequently at every third cycle, end-of-treatment visit, and posttreatment follow-up. ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00879086 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Neuropathy assessed by patient neurotoxicity questionnaire and vibration sensibility. [ Time Frame: Assessments are performed at the start of Cycles 2-6 and every third cycle, end-of-treatment visit, and post-treatment follow-up. ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • Incidence of myalgia/arthralgia AEs. [ Time Frame: From the time subject is consented to when she completes the either 21 day or 42 day post-treatment follow-up visit. ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • General safety assessed by monitoring all AEs and serious AEs, laboratory measurements, vital signs, and physical exams. [ Time Frame: Safety is assessed from the time subject is consented to when she completes the either 21 day or 42 day post-treatment follow-up visit. ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • Objective response rate, clinical benefit rate and progression-free survival based on investigator assessments according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). [ Time Frame: At Baseline, at the end of Cycles 2, 4 and 6, subsequently at the end of every third cycle, at the end-of-treatment, and at the post-treatment follow-up. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Neuropathy assessed by patient neurotoxicity questionnaire and vibration sensibility. [ Time Frame: Assessments are performed at the start of Cycles 2-6 and every third cycle, end-of-treatment visit, and posttreatment follow-up. ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • Incidence of myalgia/arthralgia AEs. [ Time Frame: From the time subject is consented to when she completes the either 21 day or 42 day posttreatment follow up visit. ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • General Safety assessed by monitoring all AEs and serious AEs, laboratory measurements, vital signs, and physical exams. [ Time Frame: Safety is assessed from the time subject is consented to when she completes the either 21 day or 42 day post treatment follow up visit. ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • Response rate, clinical benefit rate and progression-free survival based on investigator assessments according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). [ Time Frame: At Baseline, at the end of Cycles 2, 4 and 6, subsequently at the end of every third cycle, at the end-of-treatment, and at the posttreatment follow-up. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
A Study Comparing Eribulin Mesylate and Ixabepilone in Causing or Exacerbating Neuropathy in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer
A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Study Comparing Eribulin Mesylate and Ixabepilone in Causing or Exacerbating Neuropathy in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer

The purpose of this study in patients with advanced breast cancer is to compare the incidence and severity of neuropathy adverse events for the two treatment groups (eribulin versus ixabepilone) using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE version 3.0) grading.

Not Provided
Interventional
Phase 2
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Breast Cancer
  • Drug: eribulin mesylate

    E7389 (eribulin mesylate) given at a dose of 1.4 mg/m^2 as a 2 - 5 minute intravenous (IV) bolus on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle.

    The Treatment Phase will include six cycles. Patients may enter the Extension Phase for additional cycles following the sixth cycle of treatment.

    Other Name: E7389
  • Drug: ixabepilone

    Ixabepilone given at a starting dose of 32 or 40 mg/m^2 (as per approved labeling) as a 3-hour IV infusion on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle.

    The Treatment Phase will include six cycles. Patients may enter the Extension Phase for additional cycles following the sixth cycle of treatment.

  • Active Comparator: 1
    Intervention: Drug: eribulin mesylate
  • Active Comparator: 2
    Intervention: Drug: ixabepilone
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Active, not recruiting
98
Not Provided
April 2013   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion criteria:

1. Female subjects with confirmed locally recurrent or metastatic carcinoma of the breast who have received prior taxane therapy and at least one prior cytotoxic chemotherapy regimen for advanced disease.

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Subjects who have received prior ixabepilone therapy.
  2. Subjects with prior participation in an eribulin clinical study, even if not assigned to eribulin treatment.
  3. Subjects with pre-existing neuropathy Grade greater than or equal to 2.
  4. Subjects with a history of diabetes mellitus Type 1 or 2.
  5. Subjects with bilateral mastectomy which included bilateral axillary lymph node dissection.
  6. Subjects with missing digits required for vibration assessment.
  7. Subjects with any other concurrent diseases or conditions that would be expected to interfere with neuropathy assessments, which may include vitamin deficiency, sequelae of cerebrovascular disease, thyroid insufficiency, lumbar or cervical radiculopathy, or alcoholic or inflammatory neuropathy.
Female
18 Years and older
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United States
 
NCT00879086
E7389-G000-209
Not Provided
Eisai Inc.
Eisai Inc.
Not Provided
Not Provided
Eisai Inc.
June 2013

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP