Endoscopic Fundoplication Versus Proton Pump Inhibitors for GERD Treatment (TvP)

The recruitment status of this study is unknown because the information has not been verified recently.
Verified April 2009 by University of Pittsburgh.
Recruitment status was  Recruiting
Sponsor:
Collaborators:
EndoGastric Solutions
Sandhill Scientific Inc.
Crospon
Information provided by:
University of Pittsburgh
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00857597
First received: March 4, 2009
Last updated: April 17, 2009
Last verified: April 2009

March 4, 2009
April 17, 2009
March 2009
March 2010   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
GERD symptoms [ Time Frame: at 0, 6 and 12 month follow- up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
GERD symptoms; a ≥ 50% improvement will represent a clinically significant improvement. Treatment success will be defined by a significantly (p < 0.05) higher number of patients with ≥ 50% improvement in the TIF group vs. PPI group. [ Time Frame: at 0, 6 and 12 month follow- up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00857597 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • PPI usage [ Time Frame: at 0, 6 and 12 month follow- up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Lower esophageal acid exposure [ Time Frame: at 0, 6 and 12 month follow- up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Healed reflux esophagitis [ Time Frame: at 0, 6 and 12 month follow- up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Rate of adverse events [ Time Frame: at 0, 6 and 12 month follow- up ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • PPI usage; Treatment success will be defined by PPI discontinuation or a significantly higher number of patients (p<0,05) that has a reduction from "daily" to "none" or "occasional". [ Time Frame: at 0, 6 and 12 month follow- up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Normalized acid exposure; Treatment success will be defined by a significantly (p < 0.05) higher number of patients with normalized acid exposure in the TIF group (OFF PPI) vs. PPI group (ON PPI). [ Time Frame: at 0, 6 and 12 month follow- up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Healed reflux esophagitis; Healing of esophagitis will represent a clinically significant improvement. Treatment success will be defined by a significantly (p < 0.05) higher number of patients with healed esophagitis in the TIF group vs. PPI group. [ Time Frame: at 0, 6 and 12 month follow- up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Rate of (serious)adverse event (AE & SAE), gastro intestinal symptoms. Equivalence in safety will be defined by not statistically different (p > 0.05) scores and AE and SAE occurrence rate between the TIF group vs. PPI group. [ Time Frame: at 0, 6 and 12 month follow- up ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Endoscopic Fundoplication Versus Proton Pump Inhibitors for GERD Treatment
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication (TIF) Versus Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs) for Treatment of GERD: The TIF vs. PPIs Study

The study objective is to evaluate the relative merits, safety and effectiveness of Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication (TIF) in GERD patients currently treated with daily Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs).

Not Provided
Interventional
Phase 3
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)
  • Procedure: Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication
    The TIF procedure using the EsophyX system with SerosaFuse fasteners was designed to create full-thickness serosa-to-serosa plications and construct valves of 3-5 cm in length and 200-300° in circumference.
    Other Names:
    • TIF procedure
    • ELF procedure
    • Endoluminal fundoplication
    • Endoscopic fundoplication
  • Drug: Proton Pump Inhibitors; active control
    Proton Pump Inhibitors; active control
    Other Names:
    • Esomeprazole
    • Lansomeprazole
    • Omeprazole
    • Pantoprazole
    • Rabeprazole
    • Nexium
    • Prevacid
    • Dakar
    • Lanso
    • Lanzor
    • Prezal
    • Lanzol
    • Prilosec
    • Losec
    • Logastric
    • Protonix
    • Zurcal
    • Pantozol
    • Zurcale
    • Aciphex
    • Pariet
  • Experimental: EsophyX
    Intervention: Procedure: Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication
  • Active Comparator: Proton Pump Inhibitors
    Intervention: Drug: Proton Pump Inhibitors; active control
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Recruiting
120
March 2011
March 2010   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-75 years
  • Proven gastroesophageal reflux (pH < 4 for > 4.3% time while off PPIs for 7-14 days)
  • On daily PPIs for > 1 year
  • Recurrence of GERD symptoms (GERD-HRQL score difference of > 10 between on and off PPIs)
  • Normal or hypotonic LES resting pressure (5-40 mmHg)
  • Patient willingness to cooperate with random group assignment, attend 4-5 office visits and comply with all tests in this protocol
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • BMI > 35
  • Hiatal hernia > 2 cm
  • Esophagitis grade D
  • Barrett's esophagus
  • Esophageal stricture
  • Esophageal ulcer
  • Esophageal motility disorder
  • Gastric motility disorder
  • Prior splenectomy
  • Gastric paralysis
  • Pregnancy (in females)
  • Immunosuppression
  • ASA > 2
  • Portal hypertension
  • Coagulation disorders
  • Previous antireflux procedure
  • Any other health condition, which the investigator believes would prevent the patient from completing the study
  • Lack of fluency in English
Both
18 Years to 75 Years
No
Not Provided
United States,   Netherlands
 
NCT00857597
D00668-01C
Yes
Blair A Jobe, MD, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
University of Pittsburgh
  • EndoGastric Solutions
  • Sandhill Scientific Inc.
  • Crospon
Principal Investigator: Blair A Jobe, MD University of Pittsburgh
Principal Investigator: Nicole D Bouvy, MD, PhD University Hospital Maastricht, The Netherlands
University of Pittsburgh
April 2009

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP