Evaluation of VA's Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Clinical Reminder and Comprehensive TBI Evaluation (CTBIE)
| Tracking Information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Received Date ICMJE | February 25, 2009 | ||||
| Last Updated Date | April 18, 2013 | ||||
| Start Date ICMJE | July 2010 | ||||
| Primary Completion Date | September 2011 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
VA TBI Clinical Reminder [ Time Frame: All OEF/OIF Veterans to receive upon enrollment in VA ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] The mandatory 4-items screen addresses events that may increase the risk of TBI, immediate symptoms following the event, new or worsening symptoms following the event and current symptoms. |
||||
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
VA TBI Clincial Reminder [ Time Frame: All OEF/OIF Veterans to recieve upon enrollment in VA ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] | ||||
| Change History | Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00852527 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site | ||||
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
VA TBI Second Level Evaluation [ Time Frame: within 30-days of a positive screen on the TBI Clinical Reminder ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] | ||||
| Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Descriptive Information | |||||
| Brief Title ICMJE | Evaluation of VA's Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Clinical Reminder and Comprehensive TBI Evaluation (CTBIE) | ||||
| Official Title ICMJE | Evaluation of VA's TBI Clinical Reminder And Secondary Level Evaluation | ||||
| Brief Summary | The purpose of the proposed study is to determine the clinical validity and reliability of the VA's Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Clinical Reminder and the Comprehensive TBI Evaluation used to screen for mild traumatic brain injury. Examining the reliability of the two screens will determine whether they are dependable. Verifying the clinical validity is important because valid screening and evaluation of mild TBI leads to accurate diagnosis and timely treatment. Accurate screening also improves clinical efficiency and ensures that resources are provided to those who need them most. The project findings are expected to advance the science of screening and diagnosis of a mild TBI event. |
||||
| Detailed Description | A. Anticipated Impacts on Veterans' Healthcare: Determining the clinical validity of the VA's TBI Clinical Reminder and Comprehensive TBI Evaluation is critical because valid screening and evaluation of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) leads to accurate diagnosis and timely treatment. Accurate screening improves clinical efficiency and ensures that resources are provided to those who need them most. The project findings are expected to advance the science of screening and diagnosis by clarifying whether symptoms are consistent with post-concussion syndrome due to an mTBI event. Findings are also expected to inform the development of the next generation of VA screening instruments for mild TBI. B. Project Background/Rationale: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading injury among military personnel serving in the Operation Enduring Freedom/ Operation Iraqi Freedom (OEF/OIF) combat theaters due largely to improvised explosive devices. While TBI severities range from mild to severe, mTBI is particularly difficult to identify, diagnose and treat. The VA modified a version of the Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center (DVBIC) tool, which is used to screen returning OEF/OIF service members. The VA's modified screen, the TBI Clinical Reminder, is used to screen a slightly different population. Therefore, results of the validity study for the DVBIC tool are not directly applicable. As a result, the General Accountability Office (GAO) recommended the VA expeditiously evaluate the clinical validity and reliability of its TBI screening tool. C. Primary Study Objectives are: (1) Develop the Experts' Diagnostic Assessment Battery for use as a proxy gold standard, and (2) Evaluate and compare the performance characteristics of the TBI Clinical Reminder and the Comprehensive TBI Evaluation using the Experts' Diagnostic Assessment Battery. These objectives will be realized via: (a) An examination the performance characteristics (diagnostic validity) of the TBI Clinical Reminder and the Comprehensive TBI Evaluation relative to the Experts' Diagnostic Assessment Battery to determine sensitivity and specificity, (b) Determining whether false positives and/or false negatives are related to Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and how the performance characteristics of the tests differ for PTSD, (c) Ascertaining the concordance among measures of functional impairment, the TBI Clinical Reminder and the Comprehensive TBI Evaluation, (d) Establishing the concurrent validity between the diagnosis of presence or absence of post-concussion syndrome due to mTBI and measures of functional impairment, (e) Verifying the test/retest reliability for the TBI Clinical Reminder and the Comprehensive TBI Evaluation and (f) Identifying whether clusters of symptoms or subjects reporting similar patterns of symptoms correspond with clinical sub-groups (e.g., mTBI with PTSD, PTSD alone). D. Project Methods: An online Delphi process and will be conducted with mTBI experts to inform the development of the Experts' Diagnostic Assessment Battery. A sample of 720 OEF/OIF veterans will be recruited over 12-months at three VA Polytrauma Network Sites. The OEF/OIF veterans will have symptoms consistent with either a mild TBI event (True Positive) or symptoms inconsistent with such an event (True Negative). All subjects will be assessed by research clinicians using the TBI Clinical Reminder, the Comprehensive TBI Evaluation and the Experts' Diagnostic Assessment Battery. Analysis will determine the sensitivity and specificity as well as the test/retest reliability of the TBI Clinical Reminder and the Comprehensive TBI Evaluation. The performance characteristics for the Experts' Diagnostic Assessment Battery will be ascertained and used to further our understanding of how best to distinguish mTBI symptoms from related and/or comorbid conditions (e.g., PTSD, anxiety, and depression). |
||||
| Study Type ICMJE | Observational | ||||
| Study Design ICMJE | Observational Model: Cohort Time Perspective: Prospective |
||||
| Target Follow-Up Duration | Not Provided | ||||
| Biospecimen | Not Provided | ||||
| Sampling Method | Non-Probability Sample | ||||
| Study Population | Operation Enduring Freedom/ Operation Iraqi Freedom (OEF/OIF) Veterans |
||||
| Condition ICMJE | Mild Traumatic Brain Injury | ||||
| Intervention ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Study Group/Cohort (s) | Group 1 | ||||
| Publications * | Not Provided | ||||
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||
| Recruitment Information | |||||
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Completed | ||||
| Enrollment ICMJE | 456 | ||||
| Completion Date | December 2011 | ||||
| Primary Completion Date | September 2011 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria: Patients included are those service members or Veterans who have been deployed in the OEF/OIF conflict and have screened positive or negative on the TBI Clinical Reminder. Exclusion Criteria: Exclusion criteria include those service members or Veterans diagnosed with a moderate to severe TBI or a psychiatric disorder unrelated to TBI. |
||||
| Gender | Both | ||||
| Ages | 18 Years and older | ||||
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers | Yes | ||||
| Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||||
| Location Countries ICMJE | United States | ||||
| Administrative Information | |||||
| NCT Number ICMJE | NCT00852527 | ||||
| Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | SDR 08-377 | ||||
| Has Data Monitoring Committee | No | ||||
| Responsible Party | Department of Veterans Affairs | ||||
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | Department of Veterans Affairs | ||||
| Collaborators ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||
| Information Provided By | Department of Veterans Affairs | ||||
| Verification Date | March 2012 | ||||
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|||||