A Clinical Trial of Phacoemulsification Versus Phacoemulsification & the iStent Implantation in POAG Patients

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by:
University of Turin, Italy
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00847158
First received: February 18, 2009
Last updated: NA
Last verified: February 2009
History: No changes posted

February 18, 2009
February 18, 2009
December 2006
March 2008   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Primary outcomes included IOP and reduction in medication use. [ Time Frame: 15 month ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
Same as current
No Changes Posted
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
A Clinical Trial of Phacoemulsification Versus Phacoemulsification & the iStent Implantation in POAG Patients
A Randomized, Double-Masked Clinical Trial of Phacoemulsification Compared With Phacoemulsification and Micro-Bypass Stent Implantation in Patients With POAG

This was a prospective, double-masked, 15-month clinical trial comparing efficacy of phacoemulsification alone to combined phacoemulsification and implantation of the iStent® trabecular micro-bypass stent in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma.

This was a prospective, randomized open-label study of 36 patients with POAG scheduled to undergo phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation ("cataract surgery"). Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive either cataract surgery alone (control group) or cataract surgery and iStent implantation (combined surgery group).

Implantation of the study stent occurred after cataract extraction and IOL insertion using the same small, temporal, clear-corneal incision (approximately 3 mm) used to perform phacoemulsification and IOL placement. The study stent was guided into Schlemm's canal using ab-interno gonioscopy (using a Swan-Jacobs gonioscope). (Figure 1) If no complications occurred during phacoemulsification, acetylcholine was injected in the anterior chamber after the IOL implantation to constrict the pupil. The anterior chamber was then filled with a viscoelastic agent to reform the anterior chamber and provide more clearance in the angle.

The anterior chamber was traversed with the applicator (the implant was on the tip of applicator) and the trabecular meshwork located. The leading edge of the device was gently slid through the trabecular meshwork and into Schlemm's canal at the nasal position (3 to 4 o'clock for the right eye; 9 to 8 o'clock for the left eye) with the tip of the implant directed inferiorly. If difficulty was encountered with the insertion at the primary location, we tried inserting about 0.5 clock hour inferiorly; and continued to move inferiorly as needed for subsequent attempts. Next, the device was released by pushing the button on the applicator, position of the stent was verified and the applicator was withdrawn.

The patients were instructed to discontinue all glaucoma medications after surgery. Standard post cataract extraction antibiotic and anti-inflammatory drug regimen was prescribed. Target pressure for each patient was determined prior to study entry. Following the assigned procedure, any patient with an IOP (as measured between 8 and 10 AM) that was greater than 2 mm Hg over their target was instructed to return twice in the following three days for re-measurement of their IOP. If the patient's IOP was > 2 mm Hg over their target pressure, ocular hypotensive agents were added. The medications were added in a pre-set schedule, with beta-blockers first, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors second, and prostaglandins third. If, however, on the third consecutive visit the patient's IOP was within 2 mm Hg of target, patient re-entered the normal visit schedule. Investigators were masked to treatment assignment both when measuring IOP and when determining when or if to add medications.

Interventional
Not Provided
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Primary Open Angle Glaucoma and Cataracts
  • Procedure: phacoemulsification alone
    phacoemulsification alone
    Other Names:
    • cataract surgery
    • Phaco
  • Device: iStent Trabecular Micro-Bypass Stent
    phacoemulsification and implantation of the iStent® trabecular micro-bypass stent
    Other Name: iStent, Trabecular micro-bypass stent, GTS100L, GTS100R
  • Active Comparator: 1
    phacoemulsification alone
    Intervention: Procedure: phacoemulsification alone
  • Active Comparator: 2
    phacoemulsification and implantation of the iStent® trabecular micro-bypass stent
    Intervention: Device: iStent Trabecular Micro-Bypass Stent
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
36
March 2008
March 2008   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • a previous diagnosis of POAG
  • an IOP of > 18 mm Hg at three separate visits if on one medication, or subjects on at least two medications with uncontrolled IOP on three separate visits.
  • all patients were deemed likely to follow surgeon instructions and were able to give informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • any glaucoma diagnosis other than POAG
  • the presence of peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS)
  • a cloudy cornea likely to inhibit gonioscopic view of the angle
  • any previous ocular surgery
  • history of trauma or ocular surface disease
  • the presence of peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS)
  • a cloudy cornea likely to inhibit gonioscopic view of the angle
Both
18 Years and older
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Not Provided
 
NCT00847158
iStent Washout study
Yes
Antonio Fea, University of Turin, Italy
University of Turin, Italy
Not Provided
Principal Investigator: Antonio Fea, MD University of Torino
University of Turin, Italy
February 2009

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP