A Trial Comparing a Paclitaxel Eluting Stent With Biodegradable Polymer Versus a Bare Metal Stent (EUCATAX)

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Collaborator:
Eucatech AG
Information provided by:
Centro de estudios en Cardiologia Intervencionista
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00825279
First received: January 20, 2009
Last updated: May 27, 2010
Last verified: May 2010

January 20, 2009
May 27, 2010
August 2007
August 2009   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Target Vessel Failure [ Time Frame: six months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00825279 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Stent thrombosis [ Time Frame: one year ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • Paclitaxel allergy [ Time Frame: six months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • Cost-effectiveness [ Time Frame: one year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Quantitative Coronary Angiography [ Time Frame: six months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
A Trial Comparing a Paclitaxel Eluting Stent With Biodegradable Polymer Versus a Bare Metal Stent
Comparison Among a Paclitaxel Eluting Stent With Biodegradable Polymer Versus an Uncoated Bare Metal Stent. A Prospective, Multicentric and Randomized Study.(EUCATAX Trial)

The success of stent implantation has led to the increasingly widespread use of them in the treatment of coronary artery disease (Sigwart, Serruys, Fischman)and although stent restenosis is still a limit for this therapeutic mode (Serruys, Rodriguez) the new generation of stents with improved coating materials and the development of polymers that release different kinds of drugs that prevent the activation and/or proliferation of smooth muscle cells (ultimate cause of restenosis) (Grube, Rodriguez). shows major improvements on this matter. The new generation of stents with biodegradable polymers and short time of drug release gives new advantages to this therapeutic, multiple studies and registries challenge this new devices (Taxus I and II, RAVEL, SIRIUS, ERACI II and III).

For this reason the present study aims to compare a stainless steel stent with a drug eluting stent with coated of biodegradable polymer matrix hemoparin and paclitaxel.

Patients with de novo lesions treated in different Institutions in Buenos Aires Argentina were randomized to treat with a stainless steel stent ("euca STS Flex") or a drug-eluting stent (" euca STS Flex DE") with a coating of a biodegradable polymer matrix of hemoparin and paclitaxel.

Interventional
Phase 4
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single Blind (Investigator)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Coronary Artery Disease
  • Device: Bare Metal Stent
    Stainless steel stent
    Other Name: Euca STS Flex
  • Device: Drug Eluting Stent
    stent coated with the biodegradable polymer matrix hemoparin and paclitaxel
    Other Name: Euca STS Flex DE
  • Active Comparator: 1-BMS
    Bare Metal Stent (Euca STS Flex)
    Intervention: Device: Bare Metal Stent
  • Experimental: 2-DES
    Drug Eluting Stent (Euca STS Flex DE), Paclitaxel Eluting stent with biodegradable polymer
    Intervention: Device: Drug Eluting Stent

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
300
August 2009
August 2009   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient signing informed consent after receiving extensive written and oral information about the trial,
  • Older than 18 years,
  • Agreement to have a control examination done after six months,
  • Patients with angina pectoris symptoms (CCS stages i-IV, unstable angina pectoris Braunwald B and C) and patients with documented silent ischemia;
  • Patients with one or more de novo lesions which all are to be dilated in the same session;
  • Target vessel diameter of 2.5 to 4.0 mm

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Female patients of child bearing age with pregnancy suspicion(a pregnancy test will be done in this cases)
  • Acute myocardial infarction (Q wave or non Q wave ) with documented CK levels more than 2 fold higher than the normal values in the preceding 72 hours ,
  • Substantially calcified lesion precluding successful pre dilatation,
  • Ejection Fraction less than 35%,
  • Patient with previous PCI with one DES,
  • Target lesion < 2.5 mm
  • Coagulopathy or clotting disorders, leucopenia anemia or thrombocytopenia,
  • Allergy, hypersensitivity or adverse reaction to paclitaxel,
  • Intolerance to the clopidogrel, Ticlopidine or Aspirin or unable to receive clopidogrel for one year,
  • Active duodenal or gastric ulcer,
  • Life Expectancy less than 1 year,
  • Patient with LM disease (>50%)
Both
18 Years to 85 Years
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Argentina
 
NCT00825279
02-CECI, 02-CECI, IMA 01
Yes
Alfredo E Rodriguez, MD, PHD, FACC, FSCAI, Centro de Estudios en Cardiologia Intervencionista
Centro de estudios en Cardiologia Intervencionista
Eucatech AG
Study Chair: Alfredo E Rodriguez, MD, PHD Centro de estudios en Cardiologia Intervencionista
Study Director: Carlos Fernandez-Pereira, MD Centro de estudios en Cardiologia Intervencionista
Principal Investigator: Alfredo E Rodriguez, MD, PHD Centro de Estudios en Cardiologia Internvencionista
Centro de estudios en Cardiologia Intervencionista
May 2010

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP