Treatment Of Radiation Retinopathy Trial (TORR)

The recruitment status of this study is unknown because the information has not been verified recently.
Verified June 2009 by Leiden University Medical Center.
Recruitment status was  Not yet recruiting
Sponsor:
Collaborator:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Information provided by:
Leiden University Medical Center
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00811200
First received: December 17, 2008
Last updated: June 30, 2009
Last verified: June 2009

December 17, 2008
June 30, 2009
September 2009
January 2012   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
To demonstrate a statistically significant superiority of intravitreal ranibizumab (0.5mg) or triamcinolone acetonide (4.0mg) to no treatment, in the mean change from baseline in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) [ Time Frame: one year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00811200 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • To evaluate the time course of BCVA changes on ranibizumab (0.5 mg) and triamcinolone acetonide (4.0mg) relative to no treatment. [ Time Frame: one year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • To evaluate the effects of ranibizumab (0.5 mg) and triamcinolone acetonide (4.0mg) on central retinal thickness, severity of retinopathy and other anatomical changes relative to no treatment [ Time Frame: one year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • To demonstrate a possible relation between decreasing levels of angiogenic factors (such as VEGF) in the anterior chamber fluid and a good response to treatment with ranibizumab or triamcinolone acetonide, and radiation retinopathy [ Time Frame: 4 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Treatment Of Radiation Retinopathy Trial
Treatment Of Radiation Retinopathy Trial Subtitle: Treatment of Radiation Retinopathy; Influence of Lucentis® and Kenalog® on Radiation Retinopathy After Irradiation of Choroidal Melanoma.

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate a statistically significant improvement of visual acuity after treatment using either Lucentis® or Triamcinolone® compared to no treatment, in patients with radiation retinopathy.

Approximately 30-40% of patients develop a deterioration of visual acuity within 5 years after treatment of uveal melanoma using radiation therapy and TTT due to radiation retinopathy (Shields 2002, Bartlema 2003). By administration of either Lucentis® or Triamcinolone® we hope to treat complications of radiation therapy, by demonstrating a statistically significant improvement in visual acuity and a reduced amount of macular edema and vascular leakage. Additionally, we hope to obtain a better understanding of the pathophysiologic processes involved, by demonstrating a possible relation between high levels of angiogenic factors (VEGF) in the anterior chamber fluid, and radiation retinopathy. In conclusion, we hope to provide evidence for a new therapy in patients with retinopathy, due to radiation in uveal melanoma. There is no scientifically proven treatment available at this time.

Interventional
Phase 2
Phase 3
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single Blind (Subject)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Uveal Melanoma
  • Drug: ranibizumab
    three initial monthly intra vitreal injections with 0.5 mg ranibizumab
  • Drug: triamcinolone acetonide
    at baseline one intra vitreal injection with 4.0 mg triamcinolone acetonide
  • Other: sham
    at baseline one sham-injection
  • Active Comparator: 1: Lucentis
    Intervention: Drug: ranibizumab
  • Active Comparator: 2: Kenalog
    Intervention: Drug: triamcinolone acetonide
  • Sham Comparator: 3: No treatment
    Intervention: Other: sham
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Not yet recruiting
220
Not Provided
January 2012   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The eye was previously irradiated for treatment of a uveal melanoma;
  • Decrease of visual acuity after irradiation therapy by more than 10 letters (ETDRS) and is now 20/40 or less;
  • Vision decrease is considered to be due to central radiation retinopathy with significant macular edema or optic disc edema;
  • Age 18 years or older;
  • The patient is fully competent;
  • Written informed consent to participate in the trial is given.
  • Patient is not pregnant (or not fertile) and is willing to use contraceptives for the duration of the trial (one year)
  • Patient is willing and able to return for follow-up.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Vision decrease is considered to be due to ischemic radiation retinopathy without macular edema or optic disc edema;
  • Other, approved therapy indicated for treatment of condition;
  • Presence of metastasis;
  • Evidence of any other significant clinical disorder or laboratory finding that makes it undesirable for the patient to participate in the trial;
  • Pre-existing retinopathy due to other disorders;
Both
18 Years and older
No
Contact: Martine J Jager, MD, PhD +31715263097 m.j.jager@lumc.nl
Not Provided
 
NCT00811200
P09.
Yes
M.J. Jager, MD, Phd, Leiden University Medical Center
Leiden University Medical Center
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Principal Investigator: Martine J Jager, MD, PhD Leiden University Medical Center
Leiden University Medical Center
June 2009

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP