Study Comparing Total Extraperitoneal Patch "TEP" Versus Lichtenstein According Chronic Pain (TEP-LICH)

This study is currently recruiting participants.
Verified December 2008 by Skane University Hospital
Sponsor:
Collaborator:
Region Skane
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Agneta Montgomery, Skane University Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00803985
First received: December 5, 2008
Last updated: May 4, 2012
Last verified: December 2008

December 5, 2008
May 4, 2012
April 2008
October 2012   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Worst pain last week one year postoperative (IPQ-questionaire) [ Time Frame: One year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00803985 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
SF36 (physical, mental health and pain), IPQ ( Inguinal Pain Questionaire), specific clinical examination according inguinal nerves symptoms, sexual dysfunction preoperatively, one and tree years after operation. [ Time Frame: three years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Study Comparing Total Extraperitoneal Patch "TEP" Versus Lichtenstein According Chronic Pain
Prospective Randomised Study Comparing TEP vs Lichtenstein in Primary Unilateral Inguinal Hernias According Chronic Pain

The purpose of this study is to se if there is a difference regarding chronic pain and sexual dysfunction one and tree years after laparoscopic un fixated preperitoneal mesh versus gold standard open fixated on lay mesh in inguinal hernia surgery.

Prospective randomized study comparing total extraperitoneal patch TEP versus open onlay mesh according to Lichtenstein in primary unilateral inguinal hernias in men between 30 to 75 years of age. Non fixated polypropylene mesh is used in the TEP operation and fixated light weight polypropylene mesh is used in the Lichtenstein procedure. The aim is to study chronical pain and sexual dysfunction. Clinical examination according nerve function, hernia status and genital findings are performed together with a questionnaire including SF36, Inguinal Pain Questionnaire(IPQ), sexual function are registered preoperatively, one and tree years postoperatively.

Interventional
Not Provided
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Chronic Pain
  • Sexual Dysfunction
Procedure: Retro-muscular versus on lay mesh
Operation for primary inguinal hernias i men
Other Names:
  • Open hernia operation
  • Total extraperitoneal patch
  • Laparoscopic hernia operation
  • Hernia mesh operation
  • Active Comparator: Lichtenstein
    Open operation with onlay light weight polypropylene mesh
    Intervention: Procedure: Retro-muscular versus on lay mesh
  • Active Comparator: TEP
    Laparoscopic operation with preperitoneal nonfixated mesh
    Intervention: Procedure: Retro-muscular versus on lay mesh
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Recruiting
400
December 2013
October 2012   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • men between 30-75 years of age
  • ASA class I-II
  • primary unilateral inguinal hernia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • lower midline incision below linea arcuate
  • large scrotal hernia
  • previously or current abuse,mental disease
  • obesity BMI > 35
  • another simultaneous operation
  • nonreducible hernia
  • severe pain in the groin without nonrelated to hernia
  • contraindications to general anesthesia
  • need of language translator
  • liver cirrhosis or ascites
  • spread cancer disease
  • previously irradiation in the area
  • lack of operations indication
Male
30 Years to 75 Years
No
Contact: Agneta Montgomery, MD, PhD +4640336562 agneta.montgomery@skane.se
Sweden
 
NCT00803985
596/2007
No
Agneta Montgomery, Skane University Hospital
Skane University Hospital
Region Skane
Principal Investigator: Agneta Montgomery, MD, PhD University of Lund
Skane University Hospital
December 2008

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP