Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Comparison of the Laparoscopy-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy and Open Distal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer
This study is currently recruiting participants.
Study NCT00741676   Information provided by The Catholic University of Korea
First Received: August 25, 2008   Last Updated: December 30, 2008   History of Changes

August 25, 2008
December 30, 2008
August 2008
July 2013   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
2 year survival [ Time Frame: two year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00741676 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
efficacy and clinical out come [ Time Frame: two year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Same as current
 
Comparison of the Laparoscopy-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy and Open Distal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer
Comparison of the Laparoscopy-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy(LADG) and Open Distal Gastrectomy (ODG) for Advanced Gastric Cancer (Stage Ib and II).

Among surgical methods for gastric cancer, incision about 15 ~20 cm length is prepared for open gastric cancer surgery while 0.5 ~ 1.2 cm is for laparoscopy gastric cancer surgery. Complications such as pain, abdominal adhesion, and problems associated with delayed recovery are common in open surgery because of large incision; however, those complications are less common in laparoscopy surgery because small sized incision is prepared. Range of surgery for curative dissection depends on the level of progress of a cancer, i.e., depends on whether gastric wall invasion, lymph node metastasis, or invasion to adjacent organs presented. Since recurrence in the lymph nodes after the operation is very common, the most important step in the gastric surgery is to dissect lymph node completely. According to the gastric cancer surgery manual published by Japan Gastric Cancer Association, more than D2 lymph node dissection is essential for improving survival rate in advanced gastric cancer. More than D2 lymph node dissection is relatively safely conducted by open surgery, whereas it is controversial in laparoscopy surgery because it is very hard to maintain surgical field under laparoscopic condition. Recently, widened rage of lymph node dissection by using laparoscopy is possible as laparoscopic surgical techniques are accumulated and new surgical devices are introduced. According to the case reports, D2 lymph node dissection by laparoscopy surgery shows similar results to the one by open surgery in aspects of recurrence rate and the number of dissected lymph node. Also, according to Hur and el., in case of upper gastric cancer, laparoscopy surgery is more useful to dissect #10 and #11 lymph node.In our prospective case study, the investigators would like to compare effectiveness, complications, patterns of recurrence, and survival rate between the two surgical approaches, laparoscopy distal gastrectomy and open distal gastrectomy. The investigators randomly operate the advanced gastric cancer patients, who need distal gastrectomy and D2 lymph node dissection. Surgical methods are selected randomly whether open surgery or laparoscopy surgery. Finally, the investigators wish our case report to contribute to the establishment of the safety and the effectiveness of laparoscopy surgery conducted for advanced gastric cancers. Consequently, our case report will contribute to establish the ideal surgical method for the advanced gastric cancer patients.

In both arms,subtotal gastrectomy (dissect more than 2/3 of stomach and total omentectomy) and D2 lymph node dissection (around common hepatic artery, celiac artery, proximal part of splenic artery (4d, 4sb), hepatoduodenal ligament, superior mesenteric vein) wiil be performed basically. As a general rule, Billroth II method will be used for gastric reconstruction for all cases.Billroth II gastrectomy is to link the gastric pouch to the jejunum 10~15 cm distal to the ligament of Treitz. An antecolic or retrocolic gastrojejunostomy connects the jejunum to the stomach in one continuous segment. For anastomosis, absorbable suture is used. Anastomotic diameter is 5~6 cm length. Drainage tube is inserted through the right flank area and additional drainage tubes can be inserted as needed.

Phase I
Interventional
Treatment, Randomized, Single Blind (Subject), Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
Stomach Neoplasm
  • Procedure: laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy
  • Procedure: open distal gastrectomy
 

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline.
 
Recruiting
124
July 2013
July 2013   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pathologic finding by gastric endoscopy: confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma
  • Age: older than 20 year old, younger than 80 year old
  • Cancer core: located at the middle or lower part of stomach
  • Preoperative cancer stage (CT, GFS stage): cT2N0M0, cT2aN1M0, cT2bN1M0, cT3N0M0
  • ASA score: ≤ 3
  • Informed consent patients (explanation about our clinical trials is provided to the patients or patrons, if patient is not available)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Concurrent cancer patients or patient who was treated due to other types of cancer before the patient was diagnosed as a gastric cancer patient
  • Patient who was treated by other types of treatment methods, such as chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or radiotherapy
  • Patient who was received upper abdominal surgery (except, laparoscopic cholecystectomy)
  • Patient who was treated because of systemic inflammatory disease
  • Pregnant patient
  • Patient who suffer from bleeding tendency disease, such as hemophilia or patient taking anti-coagulant medication due to deep vein thrombosis
Both
20 Years to 80 Years
Yes
Contact: Wook Kim, professor 82-32-340-7022 kimwook@catholic.ac.kr
Contact: Wook Kim, Professor 82-32-340-7022 kimwook@catholic.ac.kr
Korea, Republic of
 
NCT00741676
Institutional review board of Holy Family Hospital.The Catholic University of Korea, Department of Surgery.Holy Family Hospital.
HFHGS01
The Catholic University of Korea
 
Study Chair: Wook Kim, Professor Department of Surgery, Holy Family Hospital. The Catholic University of Korea
The Catholic University of Korea
August 2008

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP