PGL4001 Versus GnRH-agonist in Uterine Myomas (PEARLII)

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
PregLem SA
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00740831
First received: August 22, 2008
Last updated: December 13, 2012
Last verified: December 2012

August 22, 2008
December 13, 2012
August 2008
January 2010   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
  • Percentage of Subjects With Reduction of Uterine Bleeding at Week 13 Visit Defined as Pictorial Blood-loss Assessment Chart (PBAC) Score < 75 at End-of-treatment Visit (Week 13 Visit) [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

    Uterine bleeding was assessed with the use of the PBAC, a validated self-reporting method to estimate menstrual blood loss.

    Patients recorded daily the number of tampons and towels used and the degree to which individual items were soiled with blood (plus small or large clots). Monthly scores range from 0 (amenorrhea) to more than 500, with higher numbers indicating more bleeding.

    A slightly stained tampon/towel scores 1, a partially stained tampon/towel scores 5, a completely saturated tampon scores 10 and a completely saturated towel scores 20. Small clots/flooding (2cm) score 1. Large clots/flooding (3cm) score 5.

    Menorrhagia is defined as a PBAC > 100 during one menstrual period which approximates to a blood loss of > 80 mL. A PBAC of 400 corresponds to a blood loss of around 300 mL or approximately 80 tampons/towels used.

    The week 13 PBAC score was calculated using the last 28 days of treatment.

  • Co-primary Safety Endpoint: Serum Estradiol Levels at End of Treatment Visit (Week 13 Visit) for PGL4001 Compared With GnRHagonist [ Time Frame: Week 13 visit ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
    Measured by log 10 (log pg/ml) transformed values for estradiol (E2) in blood samples
  • Co-primary Safety Endpoint: % of Subjects Reporting Moderate or Severe Hot Flushes as Adverse Events Throughout the Treatment Period for PGL4001 Compared With GnRH-agonist [ Time Frame: Up to week 17 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]

    Difference in percentage of subjects reporting moderate or severe hot flushes:

    Frequency and severity of this adverse event(as spontaneously reported by patients or elicited by nonleading questions) were recorded on standard forms at every visit up to week 17.

Primary efficacy objective of this study is to compare efficacy of PGL4001 versus GnRH-agonist to reduce excessive uterine bleeding. [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00740831 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
Change in the Total Volume of the Three Largest Myomas From Baseline to Week 13 [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Assessment of PGL4001 capacity to decrease volume of the three largest myomas was performed at each center by means of ultrasonography at baseline and at week 13.

The total volume of the three largest myomas assessed at screening and at end-of-treatment visit (Week 13) was analysed on a logarithm transformed scale (to base 10).

Secondary efficacy objectives are to demonstrate improvement over baseline in myoma-related symptoms such as impaired QoL and pain and to assess PGL4001 capacity to decrease uterine and myoma volume. [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
PGL4001 Versus GnRH-agonist in Uterine Myomas
A Phase III, Randomised, Parallel Group, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Active Comparator-controlled, Multicenter Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of PGL4001 vs GnRH-agonist for Pre-operative Ttt of Symptomatic Uterine Myomas

This trial will assess the efficacy and safety of PGL4001 versus GnRH agonist, over a 3-month period for the pre-operative treatment of pre-menopausal women suffering from excessive uterine bleeding due to uterine myoma.

Not Provided
Interventional
Phase 3
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Uterine Myomas
  • Drug: PGL4001
    tablets
    Other Name: Ulipristal acetate
  • Drug: leuprorelin
    solution for injection
    Other Name: GnRH-agonist
  • Experimental: A (PGL4001 5 mg)
    Drug: PGL4001 5mg (oral tablets) and leuproreline matching placebo (intramuscular injection)
    Intervention: Drug: PGL4001
  • Experimental: B (PGL4001 10mg)
    Drug: PGL4001 10 mg (oral tablets) and leuproreline matching placebo (intramuscular injection)
    Intervention: Drug: PGL4001
  • Active Comparator: C (GnRH-agonist)
    PGL4001 matching placebo (oral tablets) and leuprorelin 3.75 mg (intramuscular injection)
    Intervention: Drug: leuprorelin
Donnez J, Tomaszewski J, Vázquez F, Bouchard P, Lemieszczuk B, Baró F, Nouri K, Selvaggi L, Sodowski K, Bestel E, Terrill P, Osterloh I, Loumaye E; PEARL II Study Group. Ulipristal acetate versus leuprolide acetate for uterine fibroids. N Engl J Med. 2012 Feb 2;366(5):421-32.

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
301
June 2010
January 2010   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be a pre-menopausal woman between 18 and 50 years inclusive.
  • Have excessive uterine bleeding due to myoma
  • Have a myomatous uterus with at least one myoma of ≥ 3 cm diameter in size
  • Be eligible for one surgical procedure: e.g. hysterectomy, myomectomy or others.
  • If of childbearing potential the subject must be practicing a non-hormonal method of contraception.
  • Have a Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 18 and ≤ 40.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has a history of or current uterine, cervical, ovarian or breast cancer.
  • Has a history of or current endometrium atypical hyperplasia or adenocarcinoma.
  • Has a known severe coagulation disorder.
  • Has a history of or current treatment for myoma with a Selective Progesterone Receptor Modulator (SPRM) or a GnRH-agonist.
  • Has a history of or known current osteoporosis.
  • Has abnormal hepatic function at study entry.
  • Has a positive pregnancy test at baseline or is nursing or planning a pregnancy during the course of the study.
  • Has a current (within twelve months) problem with alcohol or drug abuse.
  • Is currently enrolled in an investigational drug or device study or has participated in such a study within the last 30 days.
Female
18 Years to 50 Years
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Austria,   Belgium,   France,   Germany,   Israel,   Italy,   Netherlands,   Poland,   Spain
 
NCT00740831
PGL07-022
Yes
PregLem SA
PregLem SA
Not Provided
Study Director: Dr Elke Bestel PregLem SA
PregLem SA
December 2012

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP