| August 12, 2008 |
| October 20, 2009 |
| July 2008 |
| January 2011 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| To determine whether anti-myeloma efficacy can be preserved or even enhanced in L-TT3 v S-TT3, due to anticipated enhanced treatment compliance and synergy between MEL and VTD. [ Time Frame: 3 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ] |
| Same as current |
| Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00734877 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site |
| To relate the anticipated improvement in the therapeutic index in L-TT3 to MEL pharmacokinetics using 50mg/m2/day for 4 successive days in L-TT3 (plus VTD) versus single short infusion of 200mg/m2 in S-TT3 [ Time Frame: 3 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ] |
| Same as current |
| |
| UARK 2008-01, Total Therapy 4 - A Phase III Trial for Low Risk Myeloma |
| UARK 2008-01, Total Therapy 4 - A Phase III Trial for Low Risk Myeloma: A Randomized Trial Comparing Standard Total Therapy 3 (S-TT3) With TT3-LITE (L-TT3) |
Toward improving the therapeutic index of standard TT3 (S-TT3), the investigators will employ a randomized Phase III trial design to determine whether S-TT3 treatment-related toxicities can be reduced by 50% in TT3-Lite (L-TT3). |
The major treatment-related toxicities in TT3 pertained to the high-dose melphalan 200mg/m2 (MEL200)-based tandem transplant approach, consisting of mucosal and other toxicities.
For the TT4 trial, we are proposing to compare standard TT3 (S-TT3) to TT3-Lite (L-TT3). L-TT3 will employ various strategies aimed at improving the therapeutic Index of S-TT3 by reducing toxicities while maintaining the superior results reported for S-TT3 in terms of frequency and duration of CR, EFS, and. The following strategies will be utilized in L-TT3:
- Applying only 1 instead of 2 cycles of induction and consolidation therapy prior to and after tandem transplant. This is supported by the well known association between prior exposure to mucotoxic therapies4, 5 and worse post-transplant mucositis, particularly when etoposide is used in the mobilizing regimen6 such as in VDTPACE.
|
| Phase III |
| Interventional |
| Treatment, Randomized, Open Label, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study |
| Multiple Myeloma |
- Drug: M-VTD-PACE
- Drug: TT3-LITE Regimen (L-TT3)
|
- Active Comparator: The standard TT3 Regimen (S-TT3) will consist of 2 cycles of induction therapy with M-VTD-PACE and PBSC collection after the 1st cycle. MEL-based tandem transplant will be administered 6 weeks to 3 months apart, applying single dose MEL 200 mg/m2 with adjustments for age and renal function. Consolidation will consist of 2 cycles of dose-reduced VTD-PACE. Maintenance treatment will employ VRD for 3 years.
- Experimental: The TT3-LITE Regimen (L-TT3) will employ only 1 cycle of induction therapy with MVTD- PACE
|
| |
| |
| Recruiting |
| 350 |
| January 2012 |
| January 2011 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
| Both |
| 18 Years to 75 Years |
| No |
|
|
| United States |
| |
| NCT00734877 |
| Elias Anaissie, MD, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences |
| UARK 2008-01 |
| University of Arkansas |
| Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
| Principal Investigator: |
Elias Anaissie, MD |
UAMS |
|
| Study Director: |
Bart Barlogie, MD, PhD |
UAMS |
|
| Study Director: |
Abbas Ali, MD |
UAMS |
|
|
| University of Arkansas |
| October 2009 |