Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
A Comparison of Hydrochlorothiazide and Metolazone in Combination With Furosemide in Congestive Heart Failure Patients
This study is currently recruiting participants.
Study NCT00690521   Information provided by University of New Mexico
First Received: June 2, 2008   Last Updated: June 3, 2008   History of Changes

June 2, 2008
June 3, 2008
January 2003
January 2009   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
The primary endpoint will be change in urinary output. [ Time Frame: 4 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00690521 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
Secondary endpoints will be changes in weight, neurohormones (angiotensin II, catecholamines, brain natriuretic peptide, aldosterone), and electrocardiographic parameters of ventricular instability. [ Time Frame: 4 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
Same as current
 
A Comparison of Hydrochlorothiazide and Metolazone in Combination With Furosemide in Congestive Heart Failure Patients
A Comparison of Hydrochlorothiazide and Metolazone in Combination With Furosemide in Congestive Heart Failure Patients

The purpose of this research study is to compare the effectiveness of hydrochlorothiazide or metolazone in combination with furosemide. Patients with heart failure suffer from swelling because of too much fluid in the body. Furosemide, hydrochlorothiazide, and metolazone are all water pills used to treat the swelling. For most patients, taking furosemide alone is successful. However, sometimes patients need to add another water pill. Doctors usually add either metolazone or hydrochlorothiazide. It is not clear which water pill is better when added to furosemide. The purpose of this study is to determine which water pill when added to furosemide is the best at reducing excess fluid in the body.

Objective: To establish which combination of diuretics is the most effective in promoting diuresis in congestive heart failure patients. Secondary Objectives: To determine the duration of action of furosemide as monotherapy and in combination with either hydrochlorothiazide or metolazone. To determine the effect of diuretic combination therapy on neurohormonal activation. Background: Diuretic resistance occurs when a potent diuretic drug, such as furosemide, is given in therapeutic doses and fails to reduce extracellular fluid volume to the desired level in an edematous patient. Studies have shown that metolazone and hydrochlorothiazide have demonstrated a synergistic response when used in combination with furosemide in congestive heart failure patients. The current guidelines for treating diuretic resistance in congestive heart failure patients recommend the metolazone-furosemide combination. However, there is no evidence to conclude that this combination is superior to hydrochlorothiazide-furosemide in increasing diuresis. Methods: Randomized, double-blind, crossover study to compare the efficacy of hydrochlorothiazide and metolazone in combination with stable doses of furosemide in 13 patients with congestive heart failure. The primary endpoint will be change in urinary output. Secondary endpoints will be changes in weight, neurohormones (angiotensin II, catecholamines, brain natriuretic peptide, aldosterone), and electrocardiographic parameters of ventricular instability. Study procedures will be performed at the UNM General Clinical Research Center. Patients will be hospitalized for 2 separate 4-day admissions, separated by a 1-week washout period. At each admission each patient will receive furosemide in combination with either metolazone or hydrochlorothiazide (metolazone for one admission and hydrochlorothiazide for the other). Following administration of combination therapy, blood and urine samples will be collected throughout the day to chart the onset and magnitude of effect of each treatment regimen. Various hemodynamic, renal, endocrine, and neurohormonal parameters will be assesed as will the effect of each combination treatment on ventricular instability using 12-lead electrocardiography. Data will be analyzed using ANOVA to compare changes from baseline and the Student t-test to analyze intertreatment differences.

All statistical analysis will be performed using SAS v6.12.

Phase IV
Interventional
Treatment, Randomized, Double Blind (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Crossover Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
Congestive Heart Failure
Drug: metolazone or hydrochlorothiazide
Active Comparator: Patients will be randomized to receive either metolazone or HCTZ in a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled crossover trial. The patients will receive the alternative medication if The specific dose of hydrochlorothiazide will be determined by the individual's creatinine clearance. A creatinine clearance of 30-50 mL/min will indicate a dose of 50 mg per day. A creatinine clearance of > 50 mL/min will indicate a dose of 25 mg per day.5 If metolazone is added to their regimen, the specific dose will be determined using the equivalence ratio of 5 mg metolazone to 50 mg hydrochlorothiazide.
 

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline.
 
Recruiting
13
January 2009
January 2009   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >18 years
  • Diagnosis of chronic congestive heart failure with an ejection fraction ≤45%
  • Currently on a stable regimen of furosemide consisting of a daily dose of at least 80 mg for at least two weeks.
  • Patients receiving ACE-inhibitors and/or beta-blockers must be taking these medications for at least two weeks in stable doses.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Renal dysfunction (serum creatinine >2 mg/dl or creatinine clearance of <30 ml/min as calculated by the Cockroft and Gault equation)
  • Hepatic dysfunction (AST and ALT >3 times the upper limit of the normal)
  • Hypokalemia (<4.0 mg/dl)
  • Concomitant treatment with any diuretic other than furosemide (with the exception of spironolactone).
Both
18 Years and older
No
Contact: Joe R. Anderson, PharmD 505-272-3664 janderson@salud.unm.edu
Contact: James J Nawarskas, PharmD 505-272-0584 jnawarskas@salud.unm.edu
United States
 
NCT00690521
Joe R. Anderson, PharmD, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center College of Pharmacy
HRRC 03-477
University of New Mexico
 
 
University of New Mexico
June 2008

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP