Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Treatment w/ TriLuma® Cream & Intense Pulsed Light vs a Mild Inactive Control Cream & Intense Pulsed Light in Melasma
This study has been terminated.
( Enrollment closed )
Study NCT00669071   Information provided by Galderma Laboratories, L.P.
First Received: April 24, 2008   Last Updated: November 6, 2008   History of Changes

April 24, 2008
November 6, 2008
December 2007
October 2008   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Melasma severity at Week 10 as evaluated using the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) of melasma (IPL/Tri- Luma® Cream side vs. IPL/Inactive Control Cream side) [ Time Frame: 10 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00669071 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Melasma severity at Week 6 as evaluated using the Investigator's Global Assessment of melasma (IPL/Tri-Luma® Cream side vs. IPL/Inactive Control Cream side) [ Time Frame: 6 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Degree of pigmentation using a Mexameter at Weeks 6 and 10 (IPL/Tri-Luma® Cream side vs. IPL/Inactive Control Cream side) [ Time Frame: 6 and 10 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Improvement in melasma at Weeks 6 and 10 as evaluated using the Investigator's and Subject's evaluation of improvement (IPL/Tri-Luma® Cream side vs. IPL/Inactive Control Cream side) [ Time Frame: 6 and 10 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Tolerability assessments and incidence of adverse events [ Time Frame: 10 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
Same as current
 
Treatment w/ TriLuma® Cream & Intense Pulsed Light vs a Mild Inactive Control Cream & Intense Pulsed Light in Melasma
Split-Face, Randomized, Open-Label Study of Sequential Treatment With Tri-Luma® Cream With Intense Pulsed Light vs. a Mild Inactive Control Cream With Intense Pulsed Light in Subjects With Melasma

This study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Tri-Luma® Cream (fluocinolone acetonide 0.01%, hydroquinone 4%, tretinoin 0.05%); TLC) when used sequentially with a series of intense pulsed light (IPL) treatments in Subjects diagnosed with moderate to severe melasma during a 10 week treatment period.

Same as above.

Phase IV
Interventional
Treatment, Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor), Uncontrolled, Single Group Assignment, Efficacy Study
Melasma
  • Drug: Fluocinolone acetonide .01%, hydroquinone 4%, tretinoin .05%
  • Drug: Inactive Control Cream
Other: Single arm study
 

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline.
 
Terminated
56
October 2008
October 2008   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects diagnosed with moderate to severe melasma on both sides of the face (IGA at baseline must be 3 or 4.)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with a diagnosis of skin cancer (BCE, SCC, Melanoma) in the areas to be treated
  • Subjects with prior facial IPL, resurfacing, deep or chemical peels within 6 months of the date of study entry
  • Subject has initiated treatment with hormones including estrogen, progesterone and/or oral contraceptives within 3 months of study entry, or who intend to discontinue hormonal therapy during the study
Both
18 Years to 74 Years
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United States
 
NCT00669071
Ronald W. Gottschalk, MD / Medical Director, Galderma Laboratories, L.P.
US10081
Galderma Laboratories, L.P.
 
Study Director: Ron W Gottschalk, MD Galderma Laboratories, L.P.
Galderma Laboratories, L.P.
November 2008

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP